Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Elevated incidence of fractures in women with invasive breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Osteoporosis International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Summary

This study evaluates the incidence of bone fractures in women with BC.We found that women with invasive breast cancer are at an increased risk for bone fractures, with fractures most commonly occurring at lower extremity and vertebral sites. The risk is further increased in women undergoing cancer therapy.

Introduction

Bone loss and fractures in breast cancer have generally been attributed to aromatase inhibitor use. This study assessed the incidence of fractures after invasive breast cancer diagnosis and evaluated bone density and FRAX risk calculation at time of fracture occurrence.

Methods

Retrospective cohort study of women with invasive breast cancer [June 2003–December 2011] who participated in an academic hospital based genetic biobank. Demographic and clinical characteristics were abstracted from the electronic medical record (EMR).

Results

A total of 422 women with invasive breast cancer were assessed; 79 (28 %) sustained fractures during the observation period; fractures occurred at multiple skeletal sites in 27 cases (116 fractures). The incidence of fractures was 40 per 1000 person-years. Women who sustained fractures were mostly white and had a family history of osteoporosis (36.9 %, p = 0.03) or history of a prior fracture (6/79, p = 0.004). Fractures occurred 4.0 years (range 0–12 years) after cancer diagnosis. Fracture cases had femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) of 0.72 + 0.12 g/cm2, T-score of −1.2, that is, within the low bone mass range. Fractures most commonly occurred in lower extremities, vertebral, and wrist sites. Hip fractures accounted for 11 % of fractures, occurring at a median age of 61 years.

Conclusions

Fractures occur shortly after commencing cancer therapy. Rapid bone loss associated with cancer therapy may precipitate fractures. Fractures occur at relatively higher BMD in BC. Occurrence of fractures in invasive breast cancer raises the possibility of cancer-induced impairment in bone quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lasser KE, Allen PD, Woolhandler SJ, Himmelstein DU, Wolfe SM, Bor DH (2002) Timing of new black box warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications. Jama 287(17):2215–2220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T et al (2004) Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 54:8–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shapiro CL, Manola J, Leboff M (2001) Ovarian failure after adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with rapid bone loss in women with early-stage breast cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 19(14):3306–3311

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Saarto T, Blomqvist C, Valimaki M, Makela P, Sarna S, Elomaa I (1997) Chemical castration induced by adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy causes rapid bone loss that is reduced by clodronate: a randomized study in premenopausal breast cancer patients. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 15(4):1341–1347

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ding H, Field TS (2007) Bone health in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer: how protective is tamoxifen? Cancer Treat Rev 33(6):506–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cooke AL, Metge C, Lix L, Prior HJ, Leslie WD (2008) Tamoxifen use and osteoporotic fracture risk: a population-based analysis. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 26(32):5227–5232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guise TA (2006) Bone loss and fracture risk associated with cancer therapy. Oncologist 11(10):1121–1131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller WR (1996) Aromatase inhibitors—where are we now? Br J Cancer 73(4):415–417

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McCloskey EV (2006) Effects of third-generation aromatase inhibitors on bone. Eur J Cancer 42:1044–1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baum M, Buzdar A, Cuzick J et al (2003) Anastrozole alone or in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone for adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with early-stage breast cancer: results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial efficacy and safety update analyses. Cancer 98(9):1802–1810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Thurlimann B, Hess D, Koberle D et al (2004) Anastrozole ('Arimidex') versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of the double-blind cross-over SAKK trial 21/95—a sub-study of the TARGET (Tamoxifen or ‘Arimidex’ Randomized Group Efficacy and Tolerability) trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 85(3):247–254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thurlimann B, Keshaviah A, Coates AS et al (2005) Breast International Group (BIG) 1–98 Collaborative Group. A comparison of letrozole and tamoxifen in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:2747–2757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards BJ, Raisch DW, Shankaran V et al (2011) Cancer therapy associated bone loss: implications for hip fractures in mid-life women with breast cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 17(3):560–568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Delmas PD, Balena R, Confravreux E, Hardouin C, Hardy P, Bremond A (1997) Bisphosphonate risedronate prevents bone loss in women with artificial menopause due to chemotherapy of breast cancer: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 15(3):955–962

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Brufsky A (2011) Adjuvant bisphosphonates for early-stage breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 12(7):610–611

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brufsky A, Harker WG, Beck JT et al (2007) Zoledronic acid inhibits adjuvant letrozole-induced bone loss in postmenopausal women with early breast cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 25(7):829–836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Coleman R (2007) Potential use of bisphosphonates in the prevention of metastases in early-stage breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer 7(Suppl 1):S29–S35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hershman DL, McMahon DJ, Crew KD et al (2008) Zoledronic acid prevents bone loss in premenopausal women undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage breast cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 26(29):4739–4745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lester JE, Dodwell D, Purohit OP et al (2008) Prevention of anastrozole-induced bone loss with monthly oral ibandronate during adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 14(19):6336–6342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ellis GK, Bone HG, Chlebowski R et al (2008) Randomized trial of denosumab in patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for nonmetastatic breast cancer. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 26(30):4875–4882

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lipton A, Steger GG, Figueroa J et al (2007) Randomized active-controlled phase II study of denosumab efficacy and safety in patients with breast cancer-related bone metastases. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology 25(28):4431–4437

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gralow JR, Biermann JS, Farooki A et al (2009) NCCN Task Force Report: bone health in cancer care. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7(3):S1–S32, quiz S33-35

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Howell A, Cuzick J, Baum M et al (2005) Results of the ATAC (Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination) trial after completion of 5 years’ adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. Lancet 365(9453):60–62

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE et al (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam study. Bone 34(1):195–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wainwright SA, Marshall LM, Ensrud K et al (2005) Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. J Clin Endocr Metab 90:2787–2793

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Cauley JA, Lucas FL, Kuller LH, Vogt MT, Browner WS, Cummings SR (1996) Bone mineral density and risk of breast cancer in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Jama 276(17):1404–1408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hadji P, Gottschalk M, Ziller V, Kalder M, Jackisch C, Wagner U (2007) Bone mass and the risk of breast cancer: the influence of cumulative exposure to oestrogen and reproductive correlates. Results of the Marburg breast cancer and osteoporosis trial (MABOT). Maturitas 56(3):312–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhang Y, Kiel DP, Kreger BE et al (1997) Bone mass and the risk of breast cancer among postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 336(9):611–617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Boutroy S, Bouxsein ML, Munoz F, Delmas PD (2005) In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 90(12):6508–6515

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Burghardt AJ, Issever AS, Schwartz AV et al (2010) High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomographic imaging of cortical and trabecular bone microarchitecture in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(11):5045–5055

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vestergaard P, Rejnmark L, Mosekilde L (2009) Diabetes and its complications and their relationship with risk of fractures in type 1 and 2 diabetes. Calcif Tissue Int 84(1):45–55

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Oleksik A, Ott SM, Vedi S, Bravenboer N, Compston J, Lips P (2000) Bone structure in patients with low bone mineral density with or without vertebral fractures. Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 15(7):1368–1375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Luengo M, Picado C, Del Rio L, Guanabens N, Montserrat JM, Setoain J (1991) Vertebral fractures in steroid dependent asthma and involutional osteoporosis: a comparative study. Thorax 46(11):803–806

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Guo XE, Kim CH (2002) Mechanical consequence of trabecular bone loss and its treatment: a three-dimensional model simulation. Bone 30(2):404–411

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Cheung AM, Robbins J, Pruthi S, et al. Cortical porosity and estimated bone strength in healthy postmenopausal women treated with exemestane for the primary prevention of breast cancer: Analyses from the nested bone strength substudy of the map.3 trial (MAP3BSS). Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 2012;27.

  36. Hadji P, Kalder M, Kauka A, Bauer M, Ziller M, Hans D (2012) Effects of exemestane and tamoxifen treatments on bone quantity and quality in patient with breast cancer. Osteoporos Int 23:S289–S290

    Google Scholar 

  37. Shao T, Shane ES, McMahon D et al (2012) Effects of high dose of bisphosphonate therapy on bone microarchitecture of the peripheral skeleton in women with early stage breast cancer. Cancer Res 72:6–12, 03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Stein EM, Liu XS, Nickolas TL et al (2011) Abnormal microarchitecture and stiffness in postmenopausal women with ankle fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96(7):2041–2048

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Warriner AH, Patkar NM, Curtis JR et al (2011) Which fractures are most attributable to osteoporosis? J Clin Epidemiol 64(1):46–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Liu-Ambrose T, Eng JJ, Khan KM, Carter ND, McKay HA (2003) Older women with osteoporosis have increased postural sway and weaker quadriceps strength than counterparts with normal bone mass: overlooked determinants of fracture risk? J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58(9):M862–M866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wernle JD, Damron TA, Allen MJ, Mann KA (2010) Local irradiation alters bone morphology and increases bone fragility in a mouse model. J Biomech 43(14):2738–2746

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Cummings SR, Nevitt MC (1994) Non-skeletal determinants of fractures: the potential importance of the mechanics of falls. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA 4(1):67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Body JJ, Bergmann P, Boonen S, et al. Management of cancer treatment-induced bone loss in early breast and prostate cancer—a consensus paper of the Belgian Bone Club Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA. 2007;epub.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Tina Kiguradze for her editorial assistance. All authors of this research paper have directly participated in the planning, execution, or analysis of the study. All authors of this paper have read and approved the final version submitted.

The table below summarizes each author’s role in preparing this manuscript

Authors

Concept/study design

Data collection/interpretation

Drafting manuscript

Critical revision of manuscript

Statistical analysis

Funding

Administrative, technical, or material support

Beatrice J Edwards

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

 

William Gradishar

Yes

  

Yes

  

Yes

Jennifer Pacheco

 

Yes

 

Yes

Yes

  

Maureen Smith

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

  

Yes

Jaime Holbrook

  

Yes

Yes

  

Yes

June McKoy

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

  

Yes

Beatrice Nardone

 

Yes

 

Yes

  

Yes

Stefani Tica

 

Yes

Yes

   

Yes

Victoria Godinez Puig

 

Yes

Yes

   

Yes

Alfred Rademaker

Yes

  

Yes

Yes

  

Irene Helenowski

   

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

Andrew D. Bunta

Yes

 

Yes

Yes

  

Yes

Paula Stern

 

Yes

Yes

Yes

  

Yes

Steven Rosen

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

  

Yes

Dennis West

Yes

Yes

 

Yes

 

Yes

Yes

Theresa Guise

  

Yes

Yes

  

Yes

This work was supported by the National Institute of Health [grants 5R01-CA125077-03 (DPW), 3R01CA125077-03S1 (BJE), and 5K01 CA134554-05 (JMM)]. A portion of this work was presented at the Annual Conference on Cancer and Bone in Chicago, December 9–11, 2011, sponsored by the International Bone and Mineral Society (IBMS), and the ASCO Breast Symposium September 6–7, 2013 San Francisco, California.

Funding sources

This work was supported by: National Institute of Health [grants 5R01-A125077-03 (DPW), 3R01CA125077-03S1 (BJE) and 5 K01 CA134554-05 (JMM)].

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. J. Edwards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Edwards, B.J., Gradishar, W.J., Smith, M.E. et al. Elevated incidence of fractures in women with invasive breast cancer. Osteoporos Int 27, 499–507 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3246-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3246-3

Keywords

Navigation