Abstract
Rationale
Considerable research indicates that “ecstasy” users perceive their memory for future intentions (prospective memory) to be impaired. However, only one empirical study to date has directly tested how this capacity is affected by ecstasy use, and this study provided relatively limited information regarding the extent, scope, or implications of problems experienced.
Objectives
The present study assessed prospective performance on a laboratory measure of prospective memory that closely represents the types of prospective memory tasks that actually occur in everyday life and provides an opportunity to investigate the different sorts of prospective memory failures that occur (“Virtual Week”).
Method
Ecstasy user group (27 current users and 34 nonusers) was between participants, and prospective memory task (regular, irregular, time-check) was within participants. A measure sensitive to specific aspects of psychopathology was also administered.
Results
Ecstasy users were significantly impaired on Virtual Week, and these deficits were of a comparable magnitude irrespective of the specific prospective memory task demands. The pattern of results was unchanged after controlling for marijuana use, level of psychopathology, and sleep quality. Further, prospective memory was shown to be significantly impaired for both relatively infrequent and relatively frequent ecstasy users, although for the latter group the magnitude of this deficit was greater.
Conclusions
Prospective memory performance is sensitive to regular and even moderate ecstasy use. Importantly, ecstasy users experience generalized difficulties with prospective memory, suggesting that these deficits are likely to have important implications for day-to-day functioning.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolla KI, McCann UD, Ricaurte GA (1998) Memory impairment in abstinent MDMA (“Ecstasy”) users. Neurology 51:1532–1537
Buaumann MH, Wang X, Rothman RB (2007) 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) neurotoxicity in rats: a reappraisal of past and present findings. Psychopharmacology 189:407–424
Burdick KE, Endick CJ, Goldberg JF (2005) Assessing cognitive deficits in bipolar disorder: are self-reports valid? Psychiatry Res 136:43–50
Cohen AL, West R, Craik FIM (2001) Modulation of the prospective and retrospective components of memory for intentions in younger and older adults. Aging Neuropsychol Cognit 8:1–13
Cook S, Marsiske M (2006) Subjective memory beliefs and cognitive performance in normal and mildly impaired older adults. Aging Ment Health 10:413–423
Craik FIM (1986) A functional account of age differences in memory. In: Klix F, Hagendorf H (eds) Human memory and cognitive capabilities: mechanisms and performances. Elsevier-North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 409–422
Dafters RI, Hoshi R, Talbot AC (2004) Contribution of cannabis and MDMA (“ecstasy”) to cognitive changes in long-term polydrug users. Psychopharmacology 173:405–410
Derogatis LR (1994) SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual, 3rd edn. NCS Pearson, Minneapolis
Grut M, Jorm AF, Fratiglioni L, Forsell Y, Vitanen M, Winblad B (1993) Memory complaints of elderly people in a population survey-variation according to dementia stage and depression. J Am Geriatr Soc 41:1295–1300
Hatzidimitriou G, McCann UD, Ricaurte GA (1999) Altered serotonin innervation patterns in the forebrain of monkeys treated with (+/−) 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine seven years previously: factors influencing abnormal recovery. J Neurosci 19:5096–5107
Heffernan TM, Jarvis H, Rodgers J, Scholey AB, Ling J (2001a) Prospective memory, everyday cognitive failure and central executive function in recreational users of Ecstasy. Hum Psychopharmacol 16:607–612
Heffernan TM, Ling J, Scholey AB (2001b) Subjective ratings of prospective memory deficits in MDMA (‘ecstasy’) users. Hum Psychopharmacol 16:339–344
Henry JD, Macleod MS, Phillips LH, Crawford JR (2004) A meta-analytic review of prospective memory and aging. Psychol Aging 19:27–39
Henry JD, Rendell PG, Kliegel M, Altgassen M (2007) Prospective memory in schizophrenia: primary or secondary impairment? Schizophr Res (in press)
Huitema B (1980) Analysis of covariance and alternatives. Wiley, New York
Kalechstein AD, De La Garza R, Mahoney JJ, Fantegrossi WE, Newton TF (2007) MDMA use and neurocognition: a meta-analytic review. Psychopharmacology 189:531–537
Kliegel M, McDaniel, MA Einstein, GO (Eds) (2007) Prospective memory: cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives. Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ (in press)
Maylor EA (1996) Age-related impairment in an event based prospective-memory task. Psychol Aging 11:74–78
McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (1992) Aging and prospective memory: basic findings and practical applications. Adv Learn Behav Disabil 7:87–105
McDaniel MA, Einstein GO (2000) Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: a multiprocess framework. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:S127–S144
Miller GA, Chapman JP (2001) Misunderstanding analysis of covariance. J Abnorm Psychol 110:40–48
Montgomery C, Fisk JE, Newcombe R (2005) The nature of ecstasy-group related deficits in associative learning. Psychopharmacology 180:141–149
Montoya AG, Sorrentino R, Lukas SE, Price BH (2002) Long-term neuropsychiatric consequences of “ecstasy” (MDMA): a review. Harv Rev Psychiatry 10:212–220
Morgan MJ (1999) Memory deficits associated with recreational use of “ecstasy” (MDMA). Psychopharmacology 141:30–36
Morgan MJ (2000) Ecstasy (MDMA): a review of its possible persistent psychological effects. Psychopharmacology 152:230–248
Pearman A, Storandt M (2005) Self-discipline and self-consciousness predict subjective memory in older adults. J Geront Ser B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 60B:153–157
Quednow BB, Kuhn K-U, Hoppe C, Westheide J, Maier W, Daum I, Wagner M (2007) Elevated impulsivity and impaired decision-making cognition in heavy users of MDMA (“Ecstasy”). Psychopharmacology 189:517–530
Raven JC, Court JH, Raven J (1988) The Mill Hill vocabulary Scale: 1988 Revision. H. K. Lewis, London
Rendell PG, Craik FIM (2000) Virtual week and actual week: age-related differences in prospective memory. Appl Cogn Psychol 14:S43–S62
Rendell PG, Jensen F, Henry JD (2007) Prospective memory in multiple sclerosis. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 13:410–416
Rodgers J, Buchanan T, Scholey AB, Heffernan TM, Ling J, Parrott A (2001) Differential effects of Ecstasy and cannabis on self-reports of memory ability: a web-based study. Hum Psychopharmacol 16:619–625
Rodgers J, Buchanan T, Scholey AB, Heffernan TM, Ling J, Parrott AC (2003) Patterns of drug use and the influence of gender on self-reports of memory ability in ecstasy users: a web-based study. J Psychopharmacol 17:389–396
Roiser JP, Rogers RD, Sahakian BJ (2007) Neuropsychological function in ecstasy users: a study controlling for polydrug use. Psychopharmacology 189:505–516
Roth RS, Geisser ME, Thyeisen-Goodvich M, Dixon PJ (2005) Cognitive complaints are associated with depression, fatigue, female sex, and pain catastrophizing in patients with chronic pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1147–1154
Scheffel U, Szabo Z, Mathews WB, Finley PA, Dannals RF, Ravert HT, Szabo K, Yuan J, Ricaurte GA (1998) In vivo detection of short- and long-term MDMA neurotoxicity—a positron emission tomography study in the living baboon brain. Synapse 29:183–192
Verbaten MN (2003) Specific memory deficits in ecstasy users? The results of a meta-analysis. Hum Psychopharmacol Clin Exp 18:281–290
Vermuelen J, Aldenkamp AP, Alpherts WCJ (1993) Memory complaints in epilepsy-correlations with cognitive performance and neuroticism. Epilepsy Res 15:157–170
Wareing M, Murphy PN, Fisk JE (2004) Visuospatial memory impairments in users of MDMA (‘ecstasy’). Psychopharmacology 173:391–397
Wechsler D (1981) WAIS-R manual. The Psychological Corporation, New York
Yip JTH, Lee TMC (2005) Effect of ecstasy use on neuropsychological function: a study in Hong Kong. Psychopharmacology 179:620–628
Zakzanis KK, Young DA, Campbell Z (2003) Prospective memory impairment in abstinent MDMA (“Ecstasy”) users. Cognit Neuropsychiatry 8:141–153
Acknowledgments
We hereby declare we have no conflicts with this research and did not receive funds from a commercial sponsor. We also declare the experiments comply with the current laws of Australia, the country in which they were performed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rendell, P.G., Gray, T.J., Henry, J.D. et al. Prospective memory impairment in “ecstasy” (MDMA) users. Psychopharmacology 194, 497–504 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0859-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-007-0859-z