Skip to main content
Log in

3D nanogap interdigitated electrode array biosensors

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three-dimensional interdigitated electrodes (IDEs) have been investigated as sensing elements for biosensors. Electric field and current density were simulated in the vicinity of these electrodes as a function of the electrode width, gap, and height to determine the optimum geometry. Both the height and the gap between the electrodes were found to have significant effect on the magnitude and distribution of the electric field and current density near the electrode surface, while the width of the electrodes was found to have a smaller effect on field strength and current density. IDEs were fabricated based on these simulations and their performance tested by detecting C-reactive protein (CRP), a stress-related protein and an important biomarker for inflammation, cardiovascular disease risk indicator, and postsurgical recuperation. CRP-specific antibodies were immobilized on the electrode surface and the formation of an immunocomplex (IC) with CRP was monitored. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was employed as the detection technique. EIS data at various concentrations (1 pg/mL to 10 μg/mL) of CRP spiked in buffer or diluted human serum was collected and fitted into an equivalent electrical circuit model. Change in resistance was found to be the parameter most sensitive to change in CRP concentration. The sensor response was linear from 0.1 ng/mL to 1 μg/mL in both buffer and 5% human serum samples. The CRP samples were validated using a commercially available ELISA for CRP detection. Hence, the viability of IDEs and EIS for the detection of serum biomarkers was established without using labeled or probe molecules.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wang J (2006) Electrochemical biosensors: towards point-of-care cancer diagnostics. Biosens Bioelectron 21:1887–1892

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sadik OA, Aluoch AO, Zhou A (2009) Status of biomolecular recognition using electrochemical techniques. Biosens Bioelectron 24:2749–2765

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gizeli E, Lowe CR (1996) Immunosensors. Curr Opin Biotechnol 7:66–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Killard AJ, Sequeira M, Diamond D, Smyth MR (2000) Electroanalysis and Biosensors in Clinical Chemistry. In: Meyers RA (ed) The Encyclopedia of Analytical Chemistry. John Wiley & Sons Ltd., New York, pp 173–207

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yoon HC, Yang H, Byun SY (2004) Ferritin immunosensing on microfabricated electrodes based on the integration of immunoprecipitation and electrochemical signaling reactions. Anal Sci 20:1249–1253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen H, Jiang C, Yu C, Zhang S, Liu B, Kong J (2009) Protein chips and nanomaterials for application in tumor marker immunoassays. Biosens Bioelectron 24:3399–3411

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baldrich E, Campo FJ, Munoz FX (2009) Biosensing at disk microelectrode arrays. Inter-electrode functionalization allows formatting into miniaturized sensing platforms of enhaced sensitivity. Biosens Bioelectron 25:920–926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen X, Wang Y, Zhou J, Yan W, Li X, Zhu JJ (2008) Electrochemical impedance immunosensor based on three-dimensionally ordered macroporous goldfilm. Anal Chem 80:2133–2140

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bothara M, Venkatraman V, Reddy R, Barrett T, Carruthers J, Prasad S (2008) Nanomonitors: electrochemical immunoassays for protein biomarker profiling. Nanomedicine 3:423–436

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Suri CR, Boro R, Nangia Y, Gandhi S, Sharma P, Wangoo N, Rajesh K, Shekhawat GS (2009) Immunoanalytical techniques for analyzing pesticides in the environment. Trends Anal Chem 28:29–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SK, Hesketh PJ, Li C, Thomas JH, Halsall HB, Heineman WR (2004) Fabrication of comb interdigitated electrodes array (IDA) for a microbead-based electrochemical assay system. Biosens Bioelectron 20:887–894

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Albers J, Grunwald T, Nebling E, Piechotta G, Hintsche R (2003) Electrical biochip technology – a tool for microarrays and continuous monitoring. Anal Bioanal Chem 377:521–527

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lisdat F, Schafer D (2008) The use of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy for biosensing. Anal Bioanal Chem 391:1555–1567

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dharuman V, Grunwald T, Nebling E, Albers J, Blohm L, Hintsche R (2005) Label-free impedance detection of oligonucleotide hybridisation on interdigitated ultramicroelectrodes using electrochemical redox probes. Biosens Bioelectron 21:645–654

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valera E, Azcon JR, Rodrıguez A, Castaner LM, Sanchez FJ, Marco MP (2007) Impedimetric immunosensor for atrazine detection using interdigitated μ-electrodes (IDμE’s). Sens Actuators B Chem 125:526–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brewood GP, Rangineni Y, Fish DJ, Bhandiwad AS, Evans DR, Solanki R, Benight AS (2008) Electrical detection of the temperature induced melting transition of a DNA hairpin covalently attached to gold interdigitated microelectrodes. Nucleic Acids Res 36:e98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Montelius L, Tegenfeldt JO, Ling TG (1995) Fabrication and characterization of a nanosensor for admittance spectroscopy of biomolecules. J Vac Sci Technol A 13:1755–1760

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Van Gerwen P, Laureyn W, Laureys W, Huyberechts G, Beeck M, Baert K, Suls J, Sansen W, Jacobs P, Hermans L, Mertens R (1998) Nanoscaled interdigitated electrode arrays for biochemical sensors. Sens Actuators B Chem 49:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Singh KV, Kaur J, Raje M, Varshney GC, Suri CR (2003) An ELISA bsed approach to optimize elution conditions for screening antibodies against hapten. Anal Bioanal Chem 377:220–224

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Finot E, Bourillot E, Prest RM, Lacroute Y, Legay G, Malki MC, Latruffe N, Siri O, Braunstein P, Dereux A (2003) Performance of interdigitated nanoelectrodes for electrochemical DNA biosensor. Ultramicroscopy 97:441–449

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hintsche R, Möller B, Dransfeld I, Wollenberger U, Scheller F, Hoffmann B (1991) biosensors on thin-film metal electrodes. Sens Actuators B Chem 4:287–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hou YX, Helali S, Zhang AD, Renault NJ, Martelet C, Minic J, Gorojankina T, Persuy MA, Augy EP, Salesse R, Bessueille F, Samitier J, Errachid A, Akimov V, Reggiani L, Pennetta C, Alfinito E (2006) Immobilization of rhodopsin on a self-assembled multilayer and its specific detection by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Biosens Bioelectron 21:1393–1402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz E, Willner I (2003) Probing biomolecular interactions at conductive and semiconductive surfaces by impedance spectroscopy: routes to impedimet ric immunosensors, DNA-sensors, and enzyme biosensors. Electroanalysis 15:913–947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Berney H, Alderman J, Lane W, Collins JK (1997) A differential capacitive biosensor using polyethylene glycol to overlay the biolayer. Sens Actuators B Chem 44:578–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Pearson TA, Mensah GA, Alexander RW, Anderson JL, Cannon RO, Criqui M, Fadl YY, Fortmann SP, Hong Y, Myers GL, Rifai N, Smith SC, Taubert K, Tracy RP, Vinicor F (2003) Markers of inflammation and cardiovascular disease: application to clinical and public health practice: a statement for health-care professionals from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association. Circulation 107:499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Black S, Kushner I, Samols D (2004) C-reactive protein. J Biol Chem 279:48487–48490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Azzaroni O, Vela ME, Fonticelli M, Benitez G, Carro P, Blum B, Salvarezza RC (2003) Electrodesorption potentials of self-assembled alkanethiolate monolayers on copper electrodes. An experimental and theoretical study. J Phys Chem B 107:13446–13454

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Castro BR, Fachini E, Hernandez J, Davis MP, Cabrera C (2006) Electrochemical and Surface Characterization of 4-Aminothiophenol Adsorption at Polycrystalline Platinum Electrodes. Langmuir 22:6102–6108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Akinaga Y, Nakajima T, Hirao K (2001) A density functional study on the adsorption of methanethiolate on the (111) surfaces of noble metals. J Chem Phys 114:8555–8564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dent AH, Aslam M (1998) The functional chemistry of Proteins and Proetin coupling. In: Aslam M, Dent AH (eds) Bioconjugation: Protein Coupling Techniques for the Biomedical Sciences. MacMillan Refrences Ltd, London, pp 50–100

    Google Scholar 

  31. Carrigan SD, Scott G, Tabrizian M (2005) Rapid three-dimensional biointerfaces for real-time immunoassay using hIL-18BPa as a model antigen. Biomaterials 26:7514–7523

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Haycock JW (1993) Polyvinylpyrrolidone as a blocking agent in immunochemical studies. Anal Biochem 208:397–399

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanwar Vikas Singh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, K.V., Whited, A.M., Ragineni, Y. et al. 3D nanogap interdigitated electrode array biosensors. Anal Bioanal Chem 397, 1493–1502 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3682-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-3682-z

Keywords

Navigation