Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effector-dependent and response location learning of probabilistic sequences in serial reaction time tasks

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Experimental Brain Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the contributions of the sequences of effectors and response locations to probabilistic sequence learning in the serial reaction time task by means of bimanual transfer. Participants, trained with the dominant hand, were either required to maintain responding with the dominant hand after transfer or to switch to the nondominant hand. For both groups, half of the participants were transferred to the originally trained sequence, whereas the other half was transferred to a mirror-ordered sequence. This way, the sequence of effectors varied independently of the sequence of response locations. Sequence learning was assessed with probabilistic sequences, composed of either first-order or second-order probabilities. Transfer of sequence knowledge to the nondominant hand was equally good for the originally trained sequence as for the mirrored sequence. This suggests that probabilistic sequence learning can be based on either the sequence of effectors or response locations. However, when participants responded with the dominant hand to a mirrored sequence, transfer performance was disturbed. This indicates that changing both the sequences of effectors and response locations has a disruptive effect on the learning performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bapi RS, Doya K, Harner A (1998) Evidence for effector independent and dependent representations and their differential time course of acquisition during motor sequence learning. Exp Brain Res 132:147–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleeremans A, Jimenez L (1998) Implicit sequence learning: the truth is in details. In: Stadler MA, Frensch PA (eds) Handbook of implicit learning. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 323–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleeremans A, McClelland JL (1991) Learning the structure of event sequences. J Exp Psychol Gen 120:235–253

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cleeremans A, Destrebecqz A, Boyer M (1998) Implicit learning: news from the front. Trends Cogn Sci 2:406–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clegg BA, DiGirolamo GJ, Keele SW (1998) Sequence learning. Trends Cogn Sci 2:275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Ivry RI, Keele SW (1990) Attention and structure in sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16:17–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curran T, Keele SW (1993) Attentional and nonattentional forms of sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 19:189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deroost N, Soetens E (2005a) Perceptual or motor learning in SRT tasks with complex sequence structures. Psychol Res (in press). DOI 10.1007/s00426-004-0196-3

  • Deroost N, Soetens E (2005b) Spatial processing and perceptual sequence learning in SRT tasks. Exp Psychol (in press)

  • Destrebecqz A, Cleeremans A (2001) Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychon Bull Rev 8:343–350

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch PA (1998) One concept, multiple meanings. On how to define the concept of implicit learning. In: Stadler MA, Frensch PA (eds) Handbook of implicit learning. Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 47–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Frensch PA, Miner CS (1994) Effect of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Mem Cogn 22:95–110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch PA, Buchner A, Lin J (1994) Implicit learning of unique and ambiguous serial transitions in the presence and absence of a distractor task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20:567–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frensch PA, Lin J, Buchner A (1998) Learning versus behavioral expression of the learned: the effects of a secondary tone-counting task on implicit learning in the serial reaction time task. Psychol Res 61:83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grafton ST, Hazeltine E, Ivry R (2002) Motor sequence learning with the nondominant left hand. Exp Brain Res 146:369–378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazeltine E (2002) The representational nature of sequence learning. In: Prinz W, Hommel B (eds) Attention and performance XIX: common mechanisms in perception and action. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 673–689

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuer H, Schmidtke V (1996) Secondary-task effects on sequence learning. Psychol Res 59:119–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hikosaka O, Nakahara H, Rand MK, Sakai K, Lu X, Nakamura K, Miyachi S, Doya K (1999) Parallel neural networks for learning sequential procedures. Trends Neurosci 22:465–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Japikse KC, Negash S, Howard JH Jr, Howard DV (2003) Intermanual transfer of procedural learning after extended practice of probabilistic sequences. Exp Brain Res 148:38–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez L, Mendez C (1999) Which attention is needed for implicit sequence learning? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 25:236–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez L, Mendez C, Cleeremans A (1996) Comparing direct and indirect measures of sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:948–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keele SW, Jennings P, Jones S, Caulton D, Cohen A (1995) On the modularity of sequence representation. J Mot Behav 27:17–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly SW, Burton AM (2001) Learning complex sequences: no role for observation. Psychol Res 65:15–23

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr U (1996) Spatial attention and implicit sequence learning: evidence for independent learning of spatial and nonspatial sequences. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22:350–364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nattkemper D, Prinz W (1997) Stimulus and response anticipation in a serial reaction task. Psychol Res 60:98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen MJ, Bullemer P (1987) Attentional requirements of learning: evidence from performance measures. Cogn Psychol 19:1–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JH, Shea CH (2005) Sequence learning: response structure and effector transfer. Q J Exp Psychol A 58:387–419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reed J, Johnson P (1994) Assessing implicit learning with indirect tests: determining what is learned about sequence structure. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 20:585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remillard G (2003) Pure perceptual-based sequence learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 29:518–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Remillard G, Clark JM (2001) Implicit learning of first-, second-, and third-order transition probabilities. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:483–498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rüsseler J, Rösler F (2000) Implicit and explicit learning of event sequences: evidence for distinct coding of perceptual and motor responses. Acta Psychol (Amst) 104:45–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider W, Eschman A, Zuccolotto A (2002) E-prime, Version 1.1. Psychology Software Tools, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Schvaneveldt R, Gomez RL (1998) Attention and probabilistic sequence learning. Psychol Res 61:175–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seger CA (1994) Implicit learning. Psychol Bull 115:163–196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soetens E, Melis A, Notebaert W (2004) Sequence learning and sequential effects. Psychol Res 69:124–137

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham DB, Nissen M, Bullemer P (1989) On the development of procedural knowledge. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15:1047–1060

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Willingham DB, Wells LA, Farrell JM, Stemwedel ME (2000) Implicit motor sequence learning is represented in response locations. Mem Cogn 28:366–375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziessler M (1998) Response-effect learning as a major component of implicit serial learning. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 24:962–978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziessler M, Nattkemper D (2001) Learning of event sequences is based on response-effect learning: further evidence from a serial reaction time task. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 27:595–613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author, Natacha Deroost, is Research Assistant of the Research Foundation—Flanders, FWOTM247.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Pleinlaan 2, 1050, Brussels, Belgium

    Natacha Deroost, Inge Zeeuws & Eric Soetens

Authors
  1. Natacha Deroost
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Inge Zeeuws
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eric Soetens
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natacha Deroost.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Deroost, N., Zeeuws, I. & Soetens, E. Effector-dependent and response location learning of probabilistic sequences in serial reaction time tasks. Exp Brain Res 171, 469–480 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0294-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0294-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation