Abstract
A Fitts’ task was used to investigate how tools are incorporated into the internal representations that underlie pointing movements, and whether such knowledge can be generalized across tasks. We measured the speed-accuracy trade-offs that occurred as target width was varied for both real and imagined movements. The dynamics of the pointing tool used in the task were manipulated—regular pen, top-heavy tool, and bottom-heavy tool—to test the fidelity of internal representations of movements involving the use of novel tools. To test if such representations can be generalized, the orientation of the pointing task was also manipulated (horizontal vs. vertical). In all conditions, both real and imagined performances conformed to the speed-accuracy relationship described by Fitts’ law. We found significant differences in imagined MTs for the two weighted tools compared to the regular pen, but not between the weighted tools. By contrast, real movement durations differed between all tools. These results indicate that even relatively brief experience using novel tools is sufficient to influence the internal representation of the dynamics of the tool-limb system. However, in the absence of feedback, these representations do not make explicit differences in performances resulting from the unique dynamics of these weighted tools.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cerritelli B, Maruff P, Wilson P, Currie J (2000) The effect of an external load on the force and timing components of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 108:91–96. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(99)00138-2
Choudhury S, Charman T, Bird V, Blakemore S (2007) Adolescent development of motor imagery in a visually guided pointing task. Conscious Cognit 16:886–896. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2006.11.001
Cramer SC, Orr EL, Cohen MJ, Lacourse MG (2007) Effects of motor imagery training after chronic, complete spinal cord injury. Exp Brain Res 177:233–242. doi:10.1007/s00221-006-0662-9
Danckert J, Ferber S, Doherty T, Steinmetz H, Nicolle D, Goodale M (2002) Selective, non-lateralized impairment of motor imagery following right parietal damage. Neurocase: case studies in neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry, and behavioural neurology 8:194–204. doi:10.1093/neucas/8.3.194
Decety J, Jeannerod M (1996) Mentally simulated movements in virtual reality: does Fitts’s law hold in motor imagery? Behav Brain Res 72:127–134. doi:10.1016/0166-4328(96)00141-6
Decety J, Jeannerod M, Prablanc C (1989) The timing of mentally represented actions. Behav Brain Res 34:35–42. doi:10.1016/S0166-4328(89)80088-9
Driskell J, Copper C, Moran A (1994) Does mental practice enhance performance? J Appl Psychol 79:481–492. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.481
Feltz DL, Landers DM (1983) The effects of mental practice on motor skill learning and performance: a meta-analysis. J Sport Psychol 5:25–57
Fitts PM (1954) The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J Exp Psychol 47:381–391. doi:10.1037/h0055392
Gentili R, Cahouet V, Ballay Y, Papaxanthis C (2004) Inertial properties of the arm are accurately predicted during motor imagery. Behav Brain Res 155:231–239. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2004.04.027
Jackson PL, Lafleur MF, Malouin F, Richards C, Doyon J (2001) Potential role of mental practice using motor imagery in neurologic rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1133–1141. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.24286
Jacobs S, Danielmeier C, Frey SH (2010) Human anterior intraparietal and ventral premotor cortices support representations of grasping with the hand or a novel tool. J Cognit Neurosci 22:2594–2608. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21372
Johnson-Frey SH (2004) Stimulation through simulation? Motor imagery and functional reorganization in hemiplegic stroke patients. Brain Cognit 55:328–331. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2004.02.032
Lotze M, Halsband U (2006) Motor imagery. J Physiol Paris 99:386–395. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2006.03.012
Martin K, Jacobs S, Frey SH (2011) Handedness-dependent and -independent cerebral asymmetries in the anterior intraparietal sulcus and ventral premotor cortex during grasp planning. Neuroimage 57:502–512. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.036
Page SJ, Levine P, Leonard A (2007) Mental practice in chronic stroke: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Stroke 38:1293–1297. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000260205.67348.2b
Papaxanthis C, Schieppati M, Gentili R, Pozzo T (2002) Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Exp Brain Res 143:447–452. doi:10.1007/s00221-002-1012-1
Plamondon R, Alimi AM (1997) Speed/accuracy trade-offs in target-directed movements. Behav Brain Sci 20:249–279. doi:10.1017/S0140525X97001441
Rodriguez M, Llanos C, Gonzalez S, Sabate M (2008) How similar are motor imagery and movement? Behav Neurosci 122:910–916. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.122.4.910
Rodriguez M, Llanos C, Sabate M (2009) The kinematics of motor imagery: comparing the dynamics of real and virtual movements. Neuropsychologia 47:489–496. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.009
Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron JC (2006) Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke 37:1941–1952. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000226902.43357.fc
Sirigu A, Cohen L, Duhamel JR, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y, Pierrot-Deseilligny C (1995) Congruent unilateral impairments for real and imagined hand movements. Neuroreport 6:997–1001. doi:10.1097/00001756-199505090-00012
Sirigu A, Duhamel JR, Cohen L, Pillon B, Dubois B, Agid Y (1996) The mental representation of hand movements after parietal cortex damage. Science 273:1564–1568. doi:10.1126/science.273.5281.1564
Slifkin A (2008) High loads induce differences between actual and imagined movement duration. Exp Brain Res 185:297–307. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-1154-2
Wilson PH, Maruff P, Ives S, Currie J (2001) Abnormalities of motor and praxis imagery in children with DCD. Hum Mov Sci 20:135–159. doi:10.1016/S0167-9457(01)00032-X
Yue G, Cole KJ (1992) Strength increases from the motor program: comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. J Neurophysiol 67:1114–1123
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by grant #NS053962 to S.H.F. from the National Institute of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. Portions of this manuscript appeared in Athan P. Papailiou’s honors thesis. The authors would like to thank research assistants Lindsey Butler, Brittany Dungan, and Elizabeth Erickson for their help with data collection, and Bill Troyer for his assistance with tool design.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Macuga, K.L., Papailiou, A.P. & Frey, S.H. Motor imagery of tool use: relationship to actual use and adherence to Fitts’ law across tasks. Exp Brain Res 218, 169–179 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3004-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3004-0