Abstract
The ability to form shared task representations is considered a keystone of social cognition. It remains, however, contentious if, and to what extent, social categorization impacts on shared representations. In the present study, we address the possibility of the modulation of action co-representation by social categorization, such as group membership and social status, as indexed by the social Simon effect. Italian participants were requested to perform a social Simon task, along with either an Italian (high-status in-group) or an Albanian (low-status out-group) participant. Results show that Italian participants co-represented the action of their partner when paired with a high-status in-group participant. Conversely, this effect was absent when they performed the task with a low-status out-group participant. Furthermore, the Albanian participants co-represented the action of their partner when paired with an Italian participant. These results suggest that group membership modulates action co-representation through the varying of the groups’ relative status. The impact of this issue is boundless given the increasing multicultural nature of our society. Indeed, if multiculturalism fails, modern society does likewise.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Costantini M, Ferri F (2013) Action co-representation and social exclusion. Exp Brain Res 227:85–92. doi:10.1007/s00221-013-3487-3
Costantini M, Di Vacri A, Chiarelli AM, Ferri F, Romani GL, Merla A (2013) Studying social cognition using near-infrared spectroscopy: the case of social Simon effect. J Biomed Opt 18:25005. doi:10.1117/1.JBO.18.2.0250051653632
Dolk T, Hommel B, Colzato LS, Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W, Liepelt R (2011) How “social” is the social Simon effect? Front Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00084
Dolk T, Hommel B, Prinz W, Liepelt R (2013) The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 39:1248–1260. doi:10.1037/a00310312013-01526-001
Dolk T, Hommel B, Colzato LS, Schütz-Bosbach S, Prinz W, Liepelt R (2014) The joint Simon effect: a review and theoretical integration. Front Psychol. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00974
Dovidio JF, Kawakami K, Gaertner SL (2002) Implicit and explicit prejudice and interracial interaction. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:62–68. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.1.62
Ellemers N (1993) The Influence of socio-structural variables on identity management strategies. Eur Rev Soc Psychol 4:27–57. doi:10.1080/14792779343000013
Ellemers N, van Knippenberg A, De Vries N, Wilke H (1988) Social identification and permeability of group boundaries. Eur J Soc Psychol 18:497–513. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420180604
Guagnano D, Rusconi E, Umiltà CA (2010) Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task. Cognition 114:348–355. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.10.008
Hommel B (2011) The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychol 136:189–202. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.04.011
Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 24:849–878 discussion 878–937
Hommel B, Colzato LS, van den Wildenberg WPM (2009) How social are task representations? Psychol Sci 20:794–798. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02367.x
Iani C, Anelli F, Nicoletti R, Arcuri L, Rubichi S (2011) The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action. Exp Brain Res 211:439–445. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2651-x
Kornblum S, Hasbroucq T, Osman A (1990) Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility—a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 97:253–270. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253
McClung JS, Jentzsch I, Reicher SD (2013) Group membership affects spontaneous mental representation: failure to represent the out-group in a joint action task. PLoS One 8:e79178. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0079178
Muller BC, Kuhn S, van Baaren RB, Dotsch R, Brass M, Dijksterhuis A (2011) Perspective taking eliminates differences in co-representation of out-group members’ actions. Exp Brain Res 211:423–428. doi:10.1007/s00221-011-2654-7
Pettigrew TF (1998) Reactions toward the new minorities of western Europe. Annu Rev Sociol 24:77–103. doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.77
Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10:70–76
Sebanz N, Rebbechi D, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Frith CD (2007) Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing. Soc Neurosci 2:81–95. doi:10.1080/17470910701237989
Simon J, Rudell A (1967) Auditory S–R compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 51:300–304
Tajfel H, Billig MG, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behaviour. Eur J Soc Psychol 1:149–178. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420010202
Tsai C-C, Kuo W-J, Hung DL, Tzeng OJL (2008) Action co-representation is tuned to other humans. J Cogn Neurosci 20:2015–2024. doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.20144
Vlainic E, Liepelt R, Colzato LS, Prinz W, Hommel B (2010) The virtual co-actor: the social Simon effect does not rely on online feedback from the other. Front Psychol 1:208. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00208
Wenke D, Atmaca S, Holländer A, Liepelt R, Baess P, Prinz W (2011) What is shared in joint action? Issues of co-representation, response conflict, and agent identification. Rev Philos Psychol 2:147–172. doi:10.1007/s13164-011-0057-0
Zick A, Pettigrew TF, Wagner U (2008) Ethnic prejudice and discrimination in Europe. J Soc Issues 64:233–251. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00559.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aquino, A., Paolini, D., Pagliaro, S. et al. Group membership and social status modulate joint actions. Exp Brain Res 233, 2461–2466 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4316-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-015-4316-7