Skip to main content
Log in

Carotid angioplasty and stenting in the elderly

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

To investigate the technical success rate as well as the procedural and mid-term complication rates of carotid angioplasty and stenting in elderly patients, a group excluded from large randomized endarterectomy trials given their perceived high surgical risk.

Methods

Of 200 consecutive carotid angioplasty and/or stenting procedures performed between March 1996 and March 2005, 21 procedures were performed without cerebral protection devices in 20 patients over the age of 79 years (mean age: 83 years, 12 men, eight women). These patients’ medical records were retrospectively reviewed for vascular imaging reports and available clinical follow-up. Procedural and mid-term complication rates were calculated and compared to a previously published cohort of 133 consecutive patients ≤79 years of age who also underwent endovascular treatment at our institution.

Results

Carotid stenosis was reduced from a mean of 82% to no significant stenosis in all procedures. The procedural stroke rate was zero of 21 procedures. The procedural transient ischemic attack rate (TIA) was one of 21 procedures (4.8%). Mean follow-up was 24.6 months (range: 1.0–79.5 months) with at least a 30-day follow-up for 20 of the 21 procedures (95.2%). There were no new strokes. There was one recurrent ipsilateral TIA at 1.9 months. In five cases with follow-up carotid ultrasonography, no hemodynamically significant restenosis had occurred. There were three myocardial infarctions (MI) occurring at 0.5, 2.1, and 15.2 months, of which the last MI was fatal. The composite 30-day stroke and death rate was zero of 21 procedures (95% confidence interval: 0–14%). No significant difference was found in the 30-day rate of stroke, TIA, MI, or death between the elderly and younger patients.

Conclusion

Carotid angioplasty and stenting in elderly patients can be performed successfully with acceptable procedural and mid-term complication rates comparable to younger patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M et al (1998) Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 339:1415–1425

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis (1995) Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 273:1421–1428

    Google Scholar 

  3. O’Hara PJ, Hertzer NR, Mascha EJ, Beven EG, Krajewski LP, Sullivan TM (1998) Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: early results and late outcome. J Vasc Surg 27:860–869 (discussion, 870–861)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maxwell JG, Taylor AJ, Maxwell BG, Brinker CC, Covington DL, Tinsley E Jr (2000) Carotid endarterectomy in the community hospital in patients age 80 and older. Ann Surg 231:781–788

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schneider JR, Droste JS, Schindler N, Golan JF (2000) Carotid endarterectomy in octogenarians: comparison with patient characteristics and outcomes in younger patients. J Vasc Surg 31:927–935

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mozes G, Sullivan TM, Torres-Russotto DR et al (2004) Carotid endarterectomy in SAPPHIRE-eligible high-risk patients: implications for selecting patients for carotid angioplasty and stenting. J Vasc Surg 39:958–965 (discussion, 965–956)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Perler BA, Dardik A, Burleyson GP, Gordon TA, Williams GM (1998) Influence of age and hospital volume on the results of carotid endarterectomy: a statewide analysis of 9918 cases. J Vasc Surg 27:25–31 (discussion, 31–23)

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fisher ES, Malenka DJ, Solomon NA, Bubolz TA, Whaley FS, Wennberg JE (1989) Risk of carotid endarterectomy in the elderly. Am J Public Health 79:1617–1620

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Winslow CM, Solomon DH, Chassin MR, Kosecoff J, Merrick NJ, Brook RH (1988) The appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy. N Engl J Med 318:721–727

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al (2004) Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 351:1493–1501

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hobson RW 2nd, Howard VJ, Roubin GS et al (2004) Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 40:1106–1111

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kadkhodayan Y, Derdeyn CP, Cross DT 3rd, Moran CJ (2005) Procedure complications of carotid angioplasty and stent placement without cerebral protection devices. Neurosurg Focus 18:e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S et al (2006) Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg 44:258–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B et al (2006) Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 355:1660–1671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Bruckmann H et al (2006) 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet 368:1239–1247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chastain HD 2nd, Gomez CR, Iyer S et al (1999) Influence of age upon complications of carotid artery stenting. UAB Neurovascular Angioplasty Team. J Endovasc Surg 6:217–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Roubin GS, New G, Iyer SS et al (2001) Immediate and late clinical outcomes of carotid artery stenting in patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a 5-year prospective analysis. Circulation 103:532–537

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shawl F, Kadro W, Domanski MJ et al (2000) Safety and efficacy of elective carotid artery stenting in high-risk patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1721–1728

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmadi R, Schillinger M, Lang W, Mlekusch W, Sabeti S, Minar E (2002) Carotid artery stenting in older patients: is age a risk factor for poor outcome? J Endovasc Ther 9:559–565

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanley JA, Lippman-Hand A (1983) If nothing goes wrong, is everything all right? Interpreting zero numerators. JAMA 249:1743–1745

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher J. Moran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kadkhodayan, Y., Cross, D.T., Derdeyn, C.P. et al. Carotid angioplasty and stenting in the elderly. Neuroradiology 49, 933–938 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0278-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-007-0278-1

Keywords

Navigation