Skip to main content
Log in

The ability to identify the intraparotid facial nerve for locating parotid gland lesions in comparison to other indirect landmark methods: evaluation by 3.0 T MR imaging with surface coils

  • Head and Neck Radiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

It is important to know whether a parotid gland lesion is in the superficial or deep lobe for preoperative planning. We aimed to investigate the ability of 3.0 T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with surface coils to identify the intraparotid facial nerve and locate parotid gland lesions, in comparison to other indirect landmark methods.

Methods

We retrospectively evaluated 50 consecutive patients with primary parotid gland lesions. The position of the facial nerve was determined by tracing the nerve in the stylomastoid foramen and then following it on sequential MR sections through the parotid gland. The retromandibular vein and the facial nerve line (FN line) were also identified. For each radiologist and each method, we determined the diagnostic ability for deep lobe lesions and superficial lobe lesions, as well as accuracy. These abilities were compared among the three methods using the Chi-square test with Yates' correction.

Results

Mean diagnostic ability for deep lobe lesions, the diagnostic ability for superficial lobe lesions, and accuracy were 92%, 86%, 87%, respectively, for the direct identification method; 67%, 89%, 86%, respectively, for the retromandibular vein method; and 25%, 99%, 90% , respectively, for the FN line method. The direct identification method had significantly higher diagnostic ability for deep lesions than the FN line method (P < 0.01), but significantly lower diagnostic ability for superficial lobe lesions than the FN line method (P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Direct identification of the intraparotid facial nerve enables parotid gland lesions to be correctly located, particularly those in the deep lobes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gaillard C, Perie S, Susini B, St Guily JL (2005) Facial nerve dysfunction after parotidectomy: the role of local factors. Laryngoscope 115:287–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Teresi LM, Kolin E, Lufkin RB, Hanafee WN (1987) MR imaging of the intraparotid facial nerve: normal anatomy and pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol 148:995–1000

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Thibault F, Halimi P, Bely N, Chevallier JM, Bonfils P, Lellouch-Tubiana A, Frija G (1983) Internal architecture of the parotid gland at MR imaging: facial nerve or ductal system? Radiology 188:701–704, discussion 705

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eracleous E, Kallis S, Tziakouri C, Blease S, Gourtsoyiannis N (1997) Sonography, CT, CT sialography, MRI and MRI sialography in investigation of the facial nerve and the differentiation between deep and superficial parotid lesions. Neuroradiology 39:506–511

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ariyoshi Y, Shimahara M (1998) Determining whether a parotid tumor is in the superficial or deep lobe using magnetic resonance imaging. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 56:23–26, discussion 26–27

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. de Ru JA, van Benthem PP, Hordijk GJ (2002) The location of parotid gland tumors in relation to the facial nerve on magnetic resonance images and computed tomography scans. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:992–994, discussion 995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ragbir M, Dunaway DJ, Chippindale AJ, Latimer J, Mohammed F, McLean NR (2002) Prediction of the position of the intraparotid portion of the facial nerve on MRI and CT. Br J Plast Surg 55:376–379

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Divi V, Fatt MA, Teknos TN, Mukherji SK (2005) Use of cross-sectional imaging in predicting surgical location of parotid neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr 29:315–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dailiana T, Chakeres D, Schmalbrock P, Williams P, Aletras A (1997) High-resolution MR of the intraparotid facial nerve and parotid duct. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:165–172

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi N, Okamoto K, Ohkubo M, Kawana M (2005) High-resolution magnetic resonance of the extracranial facial nerve and parotid duct: demonstration of the branches of the intraparotid facial nerve and its relation to parotid tumours by MRI with a surface coil. Clin Radiol 60:349–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koktzoglou I, Chung YC, Mani V, Carroll TJ, Morasch MD, Mizsei G, Simonetti OP, Fayad ZA, Li D (2006) Multislice dark-blood carotid artery wall imaging: a 1.5 T and 3.0 T comparison. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:699–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lemke AJ, Alai-Omid M, Hengst SA, Hengst SA, Kazi I, Felix R (2006) Eye imaging with a 3.0-T MRI using a surface coil—a study on volunteers and initial patients with uveal melanoma. Eur Radiol 16:1084–1089

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yarnykh VL, Terashima M, Hayes CE, Shimakawa A, Takaya N, Nguyen PK, Brittain JH, McConnell MV, Yuan C (2006) Multicontrast black-blood MRI of carotid arteries: comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths. J Magn Reson Imaging 23:691–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mehle ME, Kraus DH, Wood BG, Benninger MS, Aliachar I, Levine HL, Tucker HM, Levertu P (1993) Facial nerve morbidity following parotid surgery for benign disease: the Cleveland Clinic Foundation experience. Laryngoscope 103:386–388

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bron LP, O'Brien CJ (1997) Facial nerve function after parotidectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:1091–1096

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nouraei SA, Ismail Y, Ferguson MS, McLean NR, Milner RH, Thomson PJ, Welch AR (2008) Analysis of complications following surgical treatment of benign parotid disease. ANZ J Surg 278:134–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marchesi M, Biffoni M, Trinchi S, Turriziani V, Campana FP (2006) Facial nerve function after parotidectomy for neoplasms with deep localization. Surg Today 36:308–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Aygun N, Zinreich SJ (2006) Head and neck imaging at 3T. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 14:89–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Laing MR, McKerrow WS (1998) Intraparotid anatomy of the facial nerve and retromandibular vein. Br J Surg 75:310–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kopuz C, Ilgi S, Yavuz S, Onderoglu S (1995) Morphology of the retromandibular vein in relation to the facial nerve in the parotid gland. Acta Anat (Basel) 152:66–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to Eijiro Yamashita, B.S., Takuro Tanaka, B.S., Naoki Iwata, B.S., and Shota Sakimoto, B.S., for technical support in obtaining the high-quality MR images used in this study.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mana Ishibashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ishibashi, M., Fujii, S., Kawamoto, K. et al. The ability to identify the intraparotid facial nerve for locating parotid gland lesions in comparison to other indirect landmark methods: evaluation by 3.0 T MR imaging with surface coils. Neuroradiology 52, 1037–1045 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0718-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-010-0718-1

Keywords

Navigation