Abstract
The concept that epinephrine-based local anesthetics cannot be injected in terminal appendages has been perpetuated for decades. The hypothesis that the vasoconstrictive effect of epinephrine will result in finger necrosis has been accepted as fact, often preventing its use in hand surgery. To scientifically challenge this hypothesis, a systematic review of the literature was performed, and a survey of ASPS members reported to highlight the lack of evidence-based opinions. A systematic literature review performed using Medline, Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases identified all published studies evaluating use of epinephrine/adrenaline in hand, finger or digit surgery. Each study was independently evaluated by three reviewers for inclusion or exclusion from the systematic review. Additionally, a survey (E-survey link) was distributed to all ASPS members and data were collected over a 5-month period through SurveyMonkey®. A total of 568 articles published prior to December 2012 were identified. After elimination of 151 duplicates, 417 articles remained. Fifty-five articles were selected and full examination of the texts was performed. Forty-five studies matched the selection criteria and were included in the analysis. The ASPS member survey demonstrated a 13 % overall questionnaire response rate (5,299 questionnaires/687 responses). Of all respondents, 37.4 % felt it was unsafe to inject local anesthesia mixed with epinephrine into the fingers/thumb, respectively. Critical literature review validated the safety and efficacy of utilizing epinephrine-based local anesthetics. The author’s survey elucidates the pervasive concern of employing epinephrine in hand surgery.
Level of Evidence: Not ratable
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bunnell S (1944) Surgery of the hand. J B Lippincott Co, Philadelphia
Christopher F (1955) Minor surgery, 7th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia
Schwartz SI (1999) Principles of surgery, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Health Professions Division, New York
Campbell WC, Speed JS (1956) Campbell’s operative orthopedics, 3rd edn. Mosby, St. Louis
Green DP, Hotchkiss RN, Pederson WC (1999) Green’s operative hand surgery, 4th edn. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Physicians’ Desk Reference. 28 ed. Medical Economics Company, Montvale, NJ; 1974
Auletta MJ, Grekin RC (1991) Local anesthesia for dermatologic surgery. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Flatt AE (1963) The care of minor hand injuries. Mosby, St. Louis
Green DP (1993) Operative hand surgery. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Kleinert HE (1959) Finger tip injuries and their management. Am Surg 25:41–51
McCarthy JG (1990) Plastic surgery. Saunders, Philadelphia
Raj PP (1985) Handbook of regional anesthesia. Churchill Livingstone, New York
Sandzen SC Jr (1974) Treating acute hand and finger injuries. Am Fam Physician 9:100–17
Scott DB, Jebson PJ, Braid DP, Ortengren B, Frisch P (1972) Factors affecting plasma levels of lignocaine and prilocaine. Br J Anaesth 44:1040–9
Weckesser EC (1974) Treatment of Hand Injuries; Preservation and Restoration of Function. Press of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Distributed by Yearbook Medical Publishers
Thomson CJ, Lalonde DH (2006) Randomized double-blind comparison of duration of anesthesia among three commonly used agents in digital nerve block. Plast Reconstr Surg 118:429–432
Sonmez A, Yaman M, Ersoy B, Numanodlu A (2008) Digital blocks with and without adrenalin: a randomized-controlled study of capillary blood parameters. J Hand Surg Eur 33:515–518
Lalonde DH, Martin AL (2013) Wide-awake flexor tendon repair and early tendon mobilization in zones 1 and 2. Hand Clin 29(2):207–213
Fomon S (1960) Cosmetic surgery: principles and practice. Lippincott, Philadelphia
Rittinghausen RE, Moulds RF (1980) The use of isolated digital arteries to study factors influencing adrenergic-transmitter release in man. Clin Sci (Lond) 58:373–8
Stevens MJ, Moulds RF (1982) Pharmacological comparison of human isolated digital arteries and metacarpal veins. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 9:129–38
Stevens MJ, Moulds RF (1986) Antagonism by nifedipine of alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenoceptor-mediated responses of human digital arteries. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 236:764–9
Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller J, Mancoll JS, Phillips LG (1998) Epinephrine in digital blocks: revisited. Ann Plast Surg 41:410–4
Geddes IC (1954) A review of local anesthetics. Br J Anaesth 26:208–24
DeJong RH (1977) Local anesthetics. Thomas, Springfield
Salo M, Kanto J, Jalonen J, Laurikainen E (1979) Plasma lidocaine concentrations after different methods of releasing the tourniquet during intravenous regional anesthesia. Ann Clin Res 11:164–8
Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller JH et al (2001) Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Plast Reconstr Surg 107:393–7
Burnham PJ (1958) Regional block anesthesia for surgery of the fingers and thumb. Ind Med Surg 27:67–9
Garlock JH (1931) Gangrene of the finger following digital nerve block anesthesia. Ann Surg 94:1103–7
Hixson FP, Shafiroff BB, Werner FW, Palmer AK (1986) Digital tourniquets: a pressure study with clinical relevance. J Hand Surg 11:865–8
Bradfield WJ (1963) Digital block anesthesia and its complications. Br J Surg 50:495–8
Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ (2002) Epinephrine in the finger. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:999, author reply -1000
Lalonde D, Bell M, Benoit P, Sparkes G, Denkler K, Chang P (2005) A multicenter prospective study of 3,110 consecutive cases of elective epinephrine use in the fingers and hand: the Dalhousie Project clinical phase. J Hand Surg 30:1061–7
Covino BG (1987) Pharmacology of local anesthetic agents. Ration Drug Ther 21:1–9
Albert J, Lofstrom B (1965) Effects of epinephrine in solutions of local anesthetic agents. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl 16:71–7
Karev A (1979) A simple finger tourniquet. Br J Plast Surg 32:136
Rougemont J, Carcassonne F (1933) L’anesthesie regionale dans la pratique journaliere des interventions au niveau des doigts. Presse Med 66:218
Moulongeuet P (1928) Sphacele d’un doigt apres anesthesie en bague a la novocaine sans adrenaline. Bull Mem Soc Chir 54:782
Halla F (1928) Gangran nach oberstscherer anesthesie. Med Klin 41:15–22
Johnson HA (1967) Infiltration with epinephrine and local anesthetic mixture in the hand. JAMA: J Am Med Assoc 200:990–1
Sylaidis P, Logan A (1998) Digital blocks with adrenaline. An old dogma refuted. J Hand Surg (Br) 23:17–9
Denkler K (2005) Dupuytren’s fasciectomies in 60 consecutive digits using lidocaine with epinephrine and no tourniquet. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:802–10
Firoz B, Davis N, Goldberg LH (2009) Local anesthesia using buffered 0.5 % lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine for tumors of the digits treated with Mohs micrographic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol 61:639–43
Chowdhry S, Seidenstricker L, Cooney DS, Hazani R, Wilhelmi BJ (2010) Do not use epinephrine in digital blocks: myth or truth? Part II. A retrospective review of 1,111 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 126:2031–4
Altman AJ, Albert DM, Fournier GA (1985) Cocaine’s use in ophthalmology: our 100-year heritage. Surv Ophthal 29:300–6
Barnett A, Pearl RM (1983) Readily available, inexpensive finger tourniquet. Plast Reconstr Surg 71:134–5
Klenerman L, Biswas M, Hulands GH, Rhodes AM (1980) Systemic and local effects of the application of a tourniquet. J Bone Joint Surg Br 62:385–8
Disclosures
The following authors have no commercial associations or financial disclosures that might pose or create a conflict of interest with information presented in this submitted manuscript (such associations include consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interests, patent licensing arrangements, and payments for conducting or publicizing a study described in the manuscript): Shridharani, Manson, Magarakis, Broyles, Whitaker, Rodriguez
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shridharani, S.M., Manson, P.N., Magarakis, M. et al. The safety and efficacy of epinephrine in hand surgery: a systematic review of the literature and international survey. Eur J Plast Surg 37, 183–188 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0925-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00238-013-0925-1