Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Emergency Department Versus the Computer: Which Is the Better Electrocardiographer?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) are frequently ordered in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Pediatric cardiologists are generally not asked to interpret every ECG; thus, ED patient management is often guided by the ED physicians’ ECG interpretation. The objective of this study was to analyze the accuracy of ECG interpretation by ED physicians and a computer-generated interpretation and compare the two. A 12-month prospective study was performed in a pediatric ED. All patients (<22 years) who had an ECG in the ED were included. The ED physicians and the computer interpretation were compared to a reference standard. Each electrocardiographic diagnosis, as well as the ECG as a whole, was assigned to one of the following predetermined classes: I, normal sinus rhythm; II, minimal clinical significance; III, indeterminate clinical significance; IV, those of definite clinical significance. Both groups correctly interpreted all normal (class I) ECGs. The computer correctly interpreted approximately 75% of the class II and class III ECGs, whereas the ED physicians correctly interpreted 36% of both groups. For the class IV ECGs, both the computer and the ED physicians performed poorly, correctly interpreting just 14% and 28%, respectively. The computer proved to be more accurate than the ED physicians in interpreting ECGs of less than critical significance (classes II and III), but neither group was able to correctly interpret even a simple majority of the most significant abnormalities (class IV). We speculate that distributing the computer-generated interpretation to the ED physicians and formal review of all ED ECGs by a skilled interpreter may decrease the number of missed diagnoses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MR Bell RJ Kozak (1996) ArticleTitleSeizures and the long-QT syndrome. Ann Emergency Med 28 556–560 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiD28rnvFw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. T Bradley J Dixon R Easthope (1999) ArticleTitleUnexplained fainting, near drowning and unusual seizures in childhood: screening for long QT syndrome in New Zealand families. NZ Med J 112 299–302 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1MvitFWksA%3D%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. AM Davis JL Wilkinson (1998) ArticleTitleThe long QT syndrome and seizures in childhood. J Paediatr Child Health 34 410–411 Occurrence Handle10.1046/j.1440-1754.1998.00274.x Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1cvktVWnsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9767499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. J Fouron R Chicoine (1971) ArticleTitleECG changes in fetal imipramine (Tofranil) intoxication. Pediatrics 48 777–781 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CS2D2cngsVM%3D Occurrence Handle5121238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. EM Harris JF Knapp V Sharma (1992) ArticleTitleThe Romano–Ward syndrome: a case presenting as near drowning with a clinical review. Pediatr Emergency Care 8 272–275 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyD38jmtlE%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. LA Horton S Mosee J Brenner (1994) ArticleTitleUse of the electrocardiogram in a pediatric emergency department. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 148 184–188 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuC28zjtFI%3D Occurrence Handle8118538

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. A Ludomirsky H Klein E Kaplinsky (1982) ArticleTitleQT prolongation and polymorphous ventricular arrhythmias associated with organophorous insecticide poisoning. Am J Cardiol 49 1654–1658 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:Bi2B3czhtVE%3D Occurrence Handle7081053

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. VR Pilapil DG Watson (1970) ArticleTitleThe electrocardiogram in hyperthyroid children. Am J Dis Child 119 245–248 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CS%2BC3MzisFM%3D Occurrence Handle5414814

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. ER Snoey B Housset P Guyon et al. (1994) ArticleTitleAnalysis of emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms. J Accidental Emergency Med 11 149–153 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC3czgtVY%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. B Surawicz (1967) ArticleTitleRelationship between the electrocardiogram and electrolytes. Am Heart J 73 814–825 Occurrence Handle1:CAS:528:DyaF2sXksFWku7w%3D Occurrence Handle5338052

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. K Todd J Hoffman M Morgan (1996) ArticleTitleEffect of cardiologist ECG review on emergency department practice. Ann Emergency Med 27 16–21 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymC2c3htFw%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. D Woolley M Henck J Luck (1992) ArticleTitleComparison of electrocardiogram interpretations by family physicians, a computer, and a cardiology service. J Family Practice 34 428–432 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2B3M7jtVU%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin, MC2-2800, Houston TX 77030, USA

    C. S. Snyder, A. L. Fenrich, R. A. Friedman, K. O’Reilly & N. J. Kertesz

  2. Division of Emergency Medicine, Texas Children’s Hospital, Baylor College of Medicine, 6621 Fannin, MC2-2800, Houston, TX 77030, USA

    C. Macias

Authors
  1. C. S. Snyder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. L. Fenrich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. A. Friedman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. C. Macias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. K. O’Reilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. N. J. Kertesz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snyder, C., Fenrich, A., Friedman, R. et al. The Emergency Department Versus the Computer: Which Is the Better Electrocardiographer? . Pediatr Cardiol 24, 364–368 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-002-0332-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-002-0332-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation