References
Stein-Wexler R, O’Connor R, Daldrup-Link H et al (2015) Current methods for reducing intussusception: survey results. Pediatr Radiol 45:667–674
Vazquez JL, Ortiz M, Doniz MC et al (2012) External manual reduction of paediatric idiopathic ileocolic intussusception with US assistance: a new, standardised, effective and safe manoeuvre. Pediatr Radiol 42:1197–1204
Vazquez JL, Ortiz M, Doniz MC et al (2012) External manual reduction of paediatric idiopathic ileocolic intussusception with ultrasound assistance. Pediatr Radiol 42:1195–1196
Shiels WE 2nd, Kirks DR, Keller GL et al (1993) John Caffey Award. Colonic perforation by air and liquid enemas: comparison study in young pigs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:931–935
Sargent MA, Wilson BP (1991) Are hydrostatic and pneumatic methods of intussusception reduction comparable? Pediatr Radiol 21:346–349
Daneman A, Alton DJ, Ein S et al (1995) Perforation during attempted intussusception reduction in children — a comparison of perforation with barium and air. Pediatr Radiol 25:81–88
Conflicts of interest
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vazquez, J.L., Adamsbaum, C., Blanco, P. et al. Current methods for reducing intussusception: external manual reduction with US assistance. Pediatr Radiol 45, 1260–1261 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3405-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3405-x