Abstract.
To reduce the variability of the standardized uptake value (SUV) which is widely used to evaluate 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) uptake by neoplasms, net influx constant (Ki) was derived from SUV. The relationship Ki=SUV·kp·V 0, where k p is the plasma clearance rate and V 0 is the initial distribution volume of FDG, was utilized. A total of 71 plasma input functions were measured up to 60 min after intravenous injection of FDG in 55 patients and were analysed to obtain k p and V 0. SUV and V 0 were calculated based on either body weight or body surface area. To validate the Ki estimation, another group of eight patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck was included. Parametric images of the net influx constant were obtained by Patlak graphical analysis of dynamic positron emission tomography (PET) data and measured plasma input function. V 0 based on body weight was 0.1627±0.0329 (ml/g) and showed a weak negative correlation with body weight (y=0.23356–0.00138x, r=0.591). V 0 based on body surface area was 5540±871 (ml/m2) and had no significant correlation with body weight. k p at 50 min post injection was 0.03272±0.00243 (1/min), and had no correlation with the plasma glucose concentration. A highly significant positive correlation was noted between true Ki and estimated Ki based on both body weight (y=0.0033+1.0371x, r 2=0.897), and body surface area (y=0.0033+1.0351x, r 2=0.926). Ki, a better indicator of FDG uptake by tumour than SUV, is derivable non-invasively. Quantification of FDG uptake by Ki will aid standardization of diagnostic criteria of FDG PET oncology.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received 1 December 1997 and in revised form 9 February 1998
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sadato, N., Tsuchida, T., Nakaumra, S. et al. Non-invasive estimation of the net influx constant using the standardized uptake value for quantification of FDG uptake of tumours. Eur J Nucl Med 25, 559–564 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590050256
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002590050256