Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging of complications associated with port access of abdominal laparoscopic surgery

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Abdominal Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advanced techniques and equipment in laparoscopic surgery offer advantages over open surgery, expanding the application of this minimally invasive procedure to a wide range of abdominal operations that used to be performed as an open procedure. Laparoscopic surgery is performed in the closed abdominal cavity in which the space is limited. To create a working space in the abdominal cavity, an artificial pneumoperitoneum is established and multiple ports are placed for the introduction of various laparoscopic instruments. Unlike open surgery in which the incision is made just above the target organ, laparoscopic access is made away from the area of dissection, with the instruments triangulated around the target organ within the abdomen. This fundamental difference in approach between the open and laparoscopic procedures may lead to peculiar postoperative complications after laparoscopic surgery, which may be present away from the target organ or in the abdominal wall, and be easily missed on postoperative imaging studies. These complications include port-related direct organ injuries, such as abdominal organ or vascular injury; abdominal wall complications related to laparoscopic port insertion such as vascular injury, infection, and hernia; abdominal wall complications related to specimen removal, such as port site tumor seeding and endometriosis; and complications related to gas insufflation. The radiologist plays an important role in the diagnosis of complications after laparoscopic surgery, and therefore should be familiar with the features of such complications on imaging scans in the era of laparoscopic surgeries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thurley PD, Dhingsa R (2008) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: postoperative imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:794–801. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.3485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (2007) Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 29:433–465

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bonjer HJ, Hop WC, Nelson H, et al. (2007) Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 142:298–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, et al. (2005) Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg 241:232–237

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Daneshmand M, Mutafyan G (2008) Laparoscopic instrumentation and basic techniques. In: Pappas T, Pryor A, Harnisch M (eds) Atlas of laparoscopic surgery, 3rd edn. Philadelphia: Springer, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bishoff JT (2007) Basic techniques in laparoscopic surgery. In: Bishoff JT, Kavoussi LR (eds) Atlas of laparoscopic urologic surgery, 1st edn. Philadelphia: Elsevier, pp 1–23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jackson T, Einarsson J (2010) Single-port gynecologic surgery. Rev Obstet Gynecol 3:133–139

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Malik M, McCormack K, Krukowski ZH, et al. (2012) Single port/incision laparoscopic surgery compared with standard three-port laparoscopic surgery for appendicectomy—a randomised controlled trial. Trials 13:201. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-201

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katkhouda N (2010) General concepts. In: Katkhouda N (ed) Advanced laparoscopic surgery: techniques and tips, 2nd edn. New York: Springer, pp 1–20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Owens M, Barry M, Janjua AZ, Winter DC (2011) A systematic review of laparoscopic port site hernias in gastrointestinal surgery. Surgeon 9:218–224. doi:10.1016/j.surge.2011.01.003

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Martel G, Boushey RP, Marcello PW (2008) Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery: an evidence-based review. Minerva Chir 63:373–383

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Meijer DW, Bannenberg JJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2000) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 14:891–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmad G, O’Flynn H, Duffy JM, Phillips K, Watson A (2012) Laparoscopic entry techniques. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2:CD006583. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006583.pub3

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Munro MG (2002) Laparoscopic access: complications, technologies, and techniques. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 14:365–374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lam A, Kaufman Y, Khong SY, et al. (2009) Dealing with complications in laparoscopy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 23:631–646. doi:10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2009.03.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bishoff JT, Allaf ME, Kirkels W, et al. (1999) Laparoscopic bowel injury: incidence and clinical presentation. J Urol 161:887–890

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Zissin R, Osadchy A, Gayer G (2009) Abdominal CT findings in small bowel perforation. Br J Radiol 82:162–171. doi:10.1259/bjr/78772574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K (1997) Needle and trocar injury during laparoscopic surgery in Japan. Surg Endosc 11:1198–1201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Champault G, Cazacu F, Taffinder N (1996) Serious trocar accidents in laparoscopic surgery: a French survey of 103,852 operations. Surg Laparosc Endosc 6:367–370

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Varkarakis IM, Allaf ME, Bhayani SB, et al. (2004) Pancreatic injuries during laparoscopic urologic surgery. Urology 64:1089–1093

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sandadi S, Johannigman JA, Wong VL, et al. (2010) Recognition and management of major vessel injury during laparoscopy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 17:692–702. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Karamoshos K, Mykoniou G, Evagelou J, Skaragas G, Christodoulou A (2003) Sizable pseudoaneurysm of the abdominal aorta after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a report of a serious complication. Surg Endosc 17:661

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Moore RD, Tittley JG (1999) Laparoscopic aortic injury leading to delayed aortoenteric fistula: an alternative technique for repair. Ann Vasc Surg 13:586–588

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Stasi C, Pedicelli A, Manfredi R, Sallustio G (2001) Renocaval arteriovenous fistula as a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:261–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Oh JY, Cho JH, Kang MJ, et al. (2011) Omental infarction caused by laparoscopy-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer: CT findings. Clin Radiol 66:966–973. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2011.05.006

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Magrina JF (2002) Complications of laparoscopic surgery. Clin Obstet Gynecol 45:469–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Fernández EM, Malagón AM, Arteaga I, Díaz H, Carrillo A (2005) Conservative treatment of a huge abdominal wall hematoma after laparoscopic appendectomy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 15:634–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bluebond-Langner R, Pinto PA, Kim FJ, Hsu T, Jarrett TW (2002) Recurrent bleeding from intercostal arterial pseudoaneurysm after retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. Urology 60:1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chen LF, Anderson DJ, Hartwig MG, Kaye KS, Sexton DJ (2008) Surgical site infections after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomies in community hospitals. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 29:92–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Huddy J, Wadhwani SS, Soon Y (2008) Enterocutaneous fistula as a complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg 4:51–53

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. McAllister JD, D’Altorio RA, Rao V (1993) CT findings after uncomplicated and complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 14:356–367

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tan LG, See JY, Wong KS (2007) Necrotizing fasciitis after laparoscopic colonic surgery: case report and review of the literature. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 17:551–553

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Kusunoki M (2004) Trocar site hernia. Arch Surg 139:1248–1256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Aguirre DA, Santosa AC, Casola G, Sirlin CB (2005) Abdominal wall hernias: imaging features, complications, and diagnostic pitfalls at multi-detector row CT. Radiographics 25:1501–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Curet MJ (2004) Port site metastases. Am J Surg 187:705–712

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Viala J, Morice P, Pautier P, Castaigne D, Vanel D (2002) CT findings in two cases of port-site metastasis after laparoscopy for ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 23:293–294

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gregor H, Sam CE, Reinthaller A, Joura EA (2001) Port site metastases after laparoscopic lymph node staging of cervical carcinoma. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 8:591–593

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Paolucci V, Schaeff B, Schneider M, Gutt C (1999) Tumor seeding following laparoscopy: international survey. World J Surg 23:989–995

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Goshen E, Davidson T, Aderka D, Zwas ST (2006) PET/CT detects abdominal wall and port site metastases of colorectal carcinoma. Br J Radiol 79:572–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Silecchia G, Perrotta N, Giraudo G, et al. (2002) Abdominal wall recurrences after colorectal resection for cancer: results of the Italian registry of laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1172–1177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Barbaros U, Iyibozkurt AC, Gulluoglu M, et al. (2005) Endometriotic umbilical port site metastasis after laparoscopy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1761–1763

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ideyi SC, Schein M, Niazi M, Gerst PH (2003) Spontaneous endometriosis of the abdominal wall. Dig Surg 20:246–248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Horton JD, Dezee KJ, Ahnfeldt EP, Wagner M (2008) Abdominal wall endometriosis: a surgeon’s perspective and review of 445 cases. Am J Surg 196:207–212. doi:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.07.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hensen JH, Van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB (2006) Abdominal wall endometriosis: clinical presentation and imaging features with emphasis on sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:616–620

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Coley BD, Casola G (1993) Incisional endometrioma involving the rectus abdominis muscle and subcutaneous tissues: CT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 160:549–550

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Gidwaney R, Badler RL, Yam BL, et al. (2012) Endometriosis of abdominal and pelvic wall scars: multimodality imaging findings, pathologic correlation, and radiologic mimics. Radiographics 32:2031–2043. doi:10.1148/rg.327125024

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Novellas S, Chassang M, Bouaziz J, et al. (2010) Anterior pelvic endometriosis: MRI features. Abdom Imaging 35:742–749. doi:10.1007/s00261-010-9600-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Millitz K, Moote DJ, Sparrow RK, et al. (1994) Pneumoperitoneum after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: frequency and duration as seen on upright chest radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:837–839

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Santana A, Crausman RS, Dubin HG (1999) Late onset of subcutaneous emphysema and hypercarbia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Chest 115:1468–1471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. McAllister JD, D’Altorio RA, Snyder A (1991) CT findings after uncomplicated percutaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Comput Assist Tomogr 15:770–772

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Kalhan SB, Reaney JA, Collins RL (1990) Pneumomediastinum and subcutaneous emphysema during laparoscopy. Cleve Clin J Med 57:639–642

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gayer G, Jonas T, Apter S, et al. (2000) Postoperative pneumoperitoneum as detected by CT: prevalence, duration, and relevant factors affecting its possible significance. Abdom Imaging 25:301–305

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by a Korea University Grant (K1325621).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Deuk Jae Sung.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, N.Y., Sung, D.J., Park, B.J. et al. Imaging of complications associated with port access of abdominal laparoscopic surgery. Abdom Imaging 39, 398–410 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0060-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-013-0060-2

Keywords

Navigation