Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the survivorship of revision TKA and determine the reasons and predictors for failure. Between January 1999 to December 2005, 499 total knee arthroplasty revisions were performed on 474 patients. There were 292 (61.6%) women and 182 (38.4%) men. The average age at the time of index revision was 63.9 years. Revision was defined as surgery in which at least one component (tibial, patellar, femoral, or polyethylene) required exchange. At an average follow-up of 64.8 months (range, 24.1–111.6), and considering reoperation or re-revision as failure, there were 102 failures (18.3%). Infection was the major cause of failure (44.1%) followed by stiffness (22.6%), patellar or extensor mechanism problems (12.8%), periprosthetic fracture (5.9%), loosening (4.9%), haematoma formation (3.9%), malalignment (2.9%), and instability (2.9%). A total of 83% of failures were early (less than two years). Infection was the most common mechanism of failure of revision TKA. The majority of TKA revision failures tend to occur in the first two years after revision. The mode of failure of revision TKA appears to differ from the failure of primary TKA to some extent. Better understanding of current modes by which TKA revisions fail may enable surgeons to prevent these problems and improve outcomes for revision TKA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weir DJ, Moran CG, Pinder IM (1996) Kinematic condylar total knee arthroplasty. 14-year survivorship analysis of 208 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:907–911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Emmerson KP, Moran CG, Pinder IM (1996) Survivorship analysis of the kinematic stabilizer total knee replacement: a 10- to 14-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:441–445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Font-Rodriguez DE, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1997) Survivorship of cemented total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:79–86

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robertsson O, Knutson K, Lewold S, Lidgren L (2001) The Swedish knee arthroplasty register 1975–1997: an update with special emphasis on 41,223 knees operated on in 1988–1997. Acta Orthop Scand 72:503–513. doi:10.1080/000164701753532853

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ritter MA, Herbst SA, Keating EM, Faris PM, Meding JB (1994) Long-term survival analysis of a posterior cruciate-retaining total condylar total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 309:136–145

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stern SH, Insall JN (1992) Posterior stabilized prosthesis. Results after follow-up of nine to twelve years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:980–986

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kane RL, Saleh KJ, Wilt TJ, Bershadsky B, Cross WW 3rd, MacDonald RM, Rutks I (2003) Total knee replacement. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ) 86:1–8

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saleh KJ, Dykes DC, Tweedie RL, Mohamed K, Ravichandran A, Saleh RM, Gioe TJ, Heck DA (2002) Functional outcome after total knee arthroplasty revision: a meta-analysis. J Arthroplasty 17:967–977. doi:10.1054/arth.2002.35823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saleh KJ, Rand JA, McQueen DA (2003) Current status of revision total knee arthroplasty: how do we assess results? J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 1):S18–S20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mulhall KJ, Ghomrawi HM, Scully S, Callaghan JJ, Saleh KJ (2006) Current etiologies and modes of failure in total knee arthroplasty revision. Clin Orthop Relat Res 446:45–50. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000214421.21712.62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:780–785. doi:10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rorabeck CH, Murray P (1997) Cost effectiveness of revision total knee replacement. Instr Course Lect 46:237–240

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Healy WL, Finn D (1994) The hospital cost and the cost of the implant for total knee arthroplasty. A comparison between 1983 and 1991 for one hospital. J Bone Joint Surg Am 76:801–806

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lavernia CJ, Guzman JF, Gachupin-Garcia A (1997) Cost effectiveness and quality of life in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:134–139

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Rothman RH, Shastri S, Jacoby SM (2002) Insall Award paper. Why are total knee arthroplasties failing today? Clin Orthop Relat Res 404:7–13

    Google Scholar 

  16. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 40:373–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Friedman RJ, Hirst P, Poss R, Kelley K, Sledge CB (1990) Results of revision total knee arthroplasty performed for aseptic loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 255:235–241

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goldberg VM, Figgie MP, Figgie HE 3rd, Sobel M (1988) The results of revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:86–92

    Google Scholar 

  19. Peters CL, Hennessey R, Barden RM, Galante JO, Rosenberg AG (1997) Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 12:896–903

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rand JA, Bryan RS (1988) Results of revision total knee arthroplasties using condylar prostheses. A review of fifty knees. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70:738–745

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sheng PY, Konttinen L, Lehto M, Ogino D, Jamsen E, Nevalainen J, Pajamaki J, Halonen P, Konttinen YT (2006) Revision total knee arthroplasty: 1990 through 2002. A review of the Finnish arthroplasty registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1425–1430. doi:10.2106/JBJS.E.00737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sierra RJ, Cooney WPt, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Rand JA (2004) Reoperations after 3200 revision TKAs: rates, etiology, and lessons learned. Clin Orthop Relat Res 425:200–206

  23. Stuart MJ, Larson JE, Morrey BF (1993) Reoperation after condylar revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 286:168–173

    Google Scholar 

  24. Suarez J, Griffin W, Springer B, Fehring T, Mason JB, Odum S (2008) Why do revision knee arthroplasties fail? J Arthroplasty 23:99–103. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hartman MB, Fehring TK, Jordan L, Norton HJ (1991) Periprosthetic knee sepsis. The role of irrigation and debridement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 273:113–118

    Google Scholar 

  26. Schoifet SD, Morrey BF (1990) Treatment of infection after total knee arthroplasty by debridement with retention of the components. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1383–1390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Tattevin P, Cremieux AC, Pottier P, Huten D, Carbon C (1999) Prosthetic joint infection: when can prosthesis salvage be considered? Clin Infect Dis 29:292–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Zywiel MG, Johnson AJ, Stroh DA, Martin J, Marker DR, Mont MA (2010) Prophylactic oral antibiotics reduce reinfection rates following two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-010-0992-x

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bengtson S, Knutson K (1991) The infected knee arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up of 357 cases. Acta Orthop Scand 62:301–311

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Booth RE Jr., Lotke PA (1989) The results of spacer block technique in revision of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:57–60

    Google Scholar 

  31. Goldman RT, Scuderi GR, Insall JN (1996) 2-stage reimplantation for infected total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 331:118–124

    Google Scholar 

  32. Haleem AA, Berry DJ, Hanssen AD (2004) Mid-term to long-term followup of two-stage reimplantation for infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 428:35–39

    Google Scholar 

  33. Insall JN, Thompson FM, Brause BD (1983) Two-stage reimplantation for the salvage of infected total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1087–1098

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Segawa H, Tsukayama DT, Kyle RF, Becker DA, Gustilo RB (1999) Infection after total knee arthroplasty. A retrospective study of the treatment of eighty-one infections. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81:1434–1445

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Park SJ, Song EK, Seon JK, Yoon TR, Park GH (2009) Comparison of static and mobile antibiotic-impregnated cement spacers for the treatment of infected total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0907-x

    Google Scholar 

  36. Jacobs MA, Hungerford DS, Krackow KA, Lennox DW (1988) Revision total knee arthroplasty for aseptic failure. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:78–85

    Google Scholar 

  37. Grogan TJ, Dorey F, Rollins J, Amstutz HC (1986) Deep sepsis following total knee arthroplasty. Ten-year experience at the University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68:226–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson DP, Bannister GC (1986) The outcome of infected arthroplasty of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 68:289–291

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Rand JA, Bryan RS, Morrey BF, Westholm F (1986) Management of infected total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:75–85

    Google Scholar 

  40. Windsor RE (1991) Management of total knee arthroplasty infection. Orthop Clin North Am 22:531–538

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Nickinson RS, Board TN, Gambhir AK, Porter ML, Kay PR (2010) The microbiology of the infected knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 34:505–510. doi:10.1007/s00264-009-0797-y

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hanssen AD, Rand JA (1999) Evaluation and treatment of infection at the site of a total hip or knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 48:111–122

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Garvin KL, Cordero GX (2008) Infected total knee arthroplasty: diagnosis and treatment. Instr Course Lect 57:305–315

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest with regard to this research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Rothman Institute of Orthopedics, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, 925 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA

    S. M. Javad Mortazavi, Jeremy Molligan, Matthew S. Austin, James J. Purtill, William J. Hozack & Javad Parvizi

Authors
  1. S. M. Javad Mortazavi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jeremy Molligan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matthew S. Austin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. James J. Purtill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William J. Hozack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Javad Parvizi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Javad Parvizi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortazavi, S.M.J., Molligan, J., Austin, M.S. et al. Failure following revision total knee arthroplasty: infection is the major cause. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 35, 1157–1164 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1134-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1134-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation