Abstract
Humans show intra- and intersexual variation in second (2D) relative to fourth (4D) finger length, men having smaller 2D:4D ratio, possibly because of differential exposure to sex hormones during fetal life. The relations between 2D:4D and phenotypic traits including fitness components reported by several studies may originate from the organizational effects that sex hormones have on diverse organs and their concomitant effect on 2D:4D. Evolutionary theory posits that sexual preferences are adaptations whereby choosy individuals obtain direct or genetic indirect benefits by choosing a particular mate. Since sex hormones influence both fitness and 2D:4D, hand sexual attractiveness should depend on 2D:4D, a hypothesis tested only in one correlational study so far. We first presented hand computer images to undergraduates and found that opposite-sex hands with long 2D and 4D were considered more sexually attractive. When we experimentally manipulated hand images by increasing or decreasing 2D and/or 4D length, women preferred opposite-sex hands that had been masculinized by elongating 4D, whereas men avoided masculinized opposite-sex right hands with shortened 2D. Hence, consensus exists about which hands are attractive among different opposite-sex judges. Finger length may signal desirable sex hormone-dependent traits or genetic quality of potential mates. Psychological mechanisms mediating hand attractiveness judgments may thus reflect adaptations functioning to provide direct or indirect benefits to choosy individuals. Because the genetic mechanisms that link digit development to sex hormones may be mediated by Hox genes which are conserved in vertebrates, present results have broad implications for sexual selection studies also in nonhuman taxa.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson M (1994) Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton
Bailey AA, Hurd LH (2005) Finger length ratio (2D:4D) correlates with physical aggression in men but not in women. Biol Psychol 68:215–222
Becker JB, Breedlove SM, Crews D (1992) Behavioral endocrinology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Brown WM, Hines M, Fane BA, Breedlove SM (2002) Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Horm Behav 42:380–386
Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics. Longman, London
Fan J, Dai W, Liu F, Wu J (2005) Visual perception of male body attractiveness. Proc R Soc Lond B 272:219–226
Flegr J, Hruskova M, Hodny Z, Novotna M, Hanusova J (2005) Body height, body mass index, waist–hip ratio, fluctuating asymmetry and second to fourth digit ratio in subjects with latent toxoplasmosis. Parasitology 130:621–628
Grossman CJ (1985) Interactions between the gonadal steroids and the immune system. Science 227:257–261
Jamison CS, Meier RJ, Campell BC (1993) Dermatoglyphic asymmetry and testosterone levels in normal males. Am J Phys Anthropol 90:185–198
Koehler N, Simmons LW, Rhodes G (2004) How well does second-to-fourth digit ratio in hands correlate with other indications of masculinity in males? Proc R Soc Lond B 271:S296–S298 (Suppl)
Krumlauf R (1994) Hox genes in vertebrate development. Cell 78:191–201
Leoni B, Canova L, Saino N (2005) Sexual dimorphism in metapodial and phalanges length ratios in the wood mouse. Anat Rec 286A:955–961
Littel RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD (1996) SAS System for Mixed Models. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
Lutchmaya S, Baron-Cohen S, Raggatt P, Knickmeyer R, Manning JT (2004) 2nd to 4th digit ratios, fetal testosterone and estradiol. Early Hum Dev 77:23–28
Manning JT (2002) Digit ratio. Rutgers Univ. Press, New Brunswick, UK
Manning JT, Scutt D, Wilson J, Lewis-Jones DJ (1998) The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: a predictor of sperm number and levels of testosterone, LH and oestrogen. Hum Reprod 13:3000–3004
Manning JT, Barley L, Walton J, Lewis-Jones DI, Trivers RL, Singh D, Thornhill R, Rohde P, Bereczkei T, Henzi P, Soler M, Szwed A (2000) The 2nd:4th digit ratio, sexual dimorphism, population differences, and reproductive success: evidence for sexually antagonistic genes? Evol Hum Behav 21:163–183
Manning JT, Callow M, Bundred PE (2003a) Finger and toes ratios in humans and mice: implications for the aetiology of diseases influenced by HOX genes. Med Hypoth 60:340–343
Manning JT, Bundred PE, Newton DJ, Flanagan BF (2003b) The second to fourth digit ratio and variation in the androgen receptor gene. Evol Hum Behav 21:163–183
Martin JT, Nguyen DH (2004) Anthropometric analysis of homosexuals and heterosexuals: implications for early hormone exposure. Horm Behav 45:31–39
McFadden D, Bracht MS (2003) The relative lengths and weights of metacarpals and metatarsals in baboons (Papio hamadryas). Horm Behav 43:347–355
McFadden D, Shubel E (2002) Relative lengths of finger and toes in human males and females. Horm Behav 42:492–500
Mueller U, Mazur A (2001) Evidence for unconstrained directional selection for male tallness. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:302–311
Neave N, Laing S, Fink B, Manning JT (2003) Second to fourth digit ratio, testosterone, and perceived male dominance. Proc R Soc Lond B 270:2167–2172
Nettle D (2002) Women’s height, reproductive success and the evolution of sexual dimorphism in modern humans. Proc R Soc Lond B 269:1919–1923
Okten A, Kalyoncu M, Yaris N (2002) The ratio of second- and fourth-digit lengths and congenital hyperplasia due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency. Early Hum Dev 70:47–54
Pawlowski B, Dunbar RIM, Lipowicz A (2000) Tall men have more reproductive success. Nature 403:156
Penton-Voak IS, Jacobson A, Trivers R (2004) Populational differences in attractiveness judgments of male and female faces. Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evol Hum Behav 25:355–370
Peters M, Mackenzie K, Bryden P (2002) Finger length and distal finger extent patterns in human. Am J Phys Anthropol 117:209–217
Putz DA, Gaulin SJC, Sporter RJ, McBurney DH (2004) Sex hormones and finger length. What does 2D:4D indicate? Evol Hum Behav 25:182–199
Reis VA, Zaidel DW (2001) Brain and face: communicating signals of health in the left and right sides of the face. Brain Cogn 46:240–244
Romano M, Leoni B, Saino N (2006) Examination marks of male university students positively correlate with finger length ratios (2D:4D). Biol Psychol 71:175–182
Romano M, Rubolini D, Martinelli R, Bonisoli-Alquati A, Saino N (2005) Experimental manipulation of yolk testosterone affects digit length ratio in the ring-necked pheasant (Phasianus colchicus). Horm Behav 48:342–346
Roney JR, Maestripieri D (2004) Relative digit lengths predict men’s behavior and attractiveness during social interactions with women. Hum Nat 15:271–282
Roney JR, Whitham JC, Leoni M, Bellem A, Wielebnowski N, Maestripieri D (2004) Relative digit lengths and testosterone levels in Guinea baboons. Horm Behav 45:285–290
Saino N, Leoni B, Romano M (2006) Human digit ratios depend on birth order and sex of older siblings, and predict maternal fecundity. Behav Ecol Sociobiol (in press)
Sisk CL, Schulz KM, Zehr JL (2003) Steroids and the nervous system. Ann NY Acad Sci 1007:189–198
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ (1995) Biometry. Freeman, New York
van Anders SM, Vernon PA, Wilbur CJ (2006) Finger length ratios show evidence of prenatal hormone transfer between opposite-sex twins. Horm Behav 49:315–319
Zahavi A (1977) The cost of honesty (further remarks on the handicap principle). J Theor Biol 67:603–605
Zar JH (1999) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by T. Czeschlik
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saino, N., Romano, M. & Innocenti, P. Length of index and ring fingers differentially influence sexual attractiveness of men’s and women’s hands. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60, 447–454 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0185-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0185-1