Skip to main content
Log in

White tail plumage and brood sex ratio in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis thurberi)

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Theory, empirical examples, and recently, proximate mechanisms point to the possibility of adaptive sex ratio adjustment in various organisms. General predictions state that a female should adjust her offspring sex ratio to maximize the benefits or minimize the costs of reproduction given her physical condition or current social and environmental conditions. I tested for an influence of male attractiveness on brood sex ratio in a population of dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis thurberi) by manipulating a male’s white outer tail feathers (“tail white”). Experimentally increasing male tail white did not significantly affect sex ratio, nor was premanipulated male tail white significantly related to brood sex ratio. However, the amount of white on the female’s outer tail feathers, independently of female condition, was positively related to the number of sons in a brood. Determining how a female’s potential genetic contribution to her sons’ attractiveness influences offspring sex ratio should be a priority for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abroe B, Garvin JC, Pedersen MC, Whittingham LA, Dunn PO (2007) Brood sex ratios are related to male size but not to attractiveness in common yellowthroats (Geothlypis trichas). Auk 124:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balph MH, Balph DF, Romesburg C (1979) Social status signaling in winter flocking birds: an examination of current hypotheses. Auk 96:78–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown ME (1996) Assessing body condition in birds. Curr Ornithol 13:67–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1986) Sex-ratio manipulation in color-banded populations of zebra finches. Evolution 40:1191–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burley N (1988) The differential allocation hypothesis: an experimental test. Am Nat 132:611–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassey P, Ewen JG, Møller AP (2006) Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:3129–3130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A, Legge S, Double MC (2002) Sex ratios in birds and mammals: can the hypotheses be disentangled? In: Hardy I (ed) Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 266–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawley MJ (1993) GLIM for ecologists. Blackwell, Boston, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Delhey K, Peters A, Johnsen A, Kempenaers B (2007) Brood sex ratio and male UV ornamentation in blue tits (Cyanistes caeruleus): correlational evidence and an experimental test. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61: 853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling DK, Mulder RA (2006) Combined influence of maternal and paternal quality on sex allocation in red-capped robins. J Evol Biol 19:440–449

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dreiss A, Richard M, Moyen F, White J, Moller AP, Danchin E (2006) Sex ratio and male sexual characters in a population of blue tits, Parus caeruleus. Behav Ecol 17:13–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enstrom DA, Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr (1997) Testosterone and mate choice in the dark-eyed junco. Anim Behav 54:1135–1146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen JG, Cassey P, King RAR (2003) Assessment of the randomization test for binomial sex-ratio distribution in birds. Auk 120:62–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewen JG, Cassey P, Møller AP (2004) Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds. Proc R Soc Lond B 271:1277–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A (2007) G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Meth, (in press)

  • Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Green AJ (2001) Mass/length residuals: measures of body condition or generators of spurious results? Ecology 82:1473–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths R, Double MC, Orr K, Dawson RJG (1998) A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol 7:1071–1075

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Grindstaff JL, Buerkle CA, Casto JM, Nolan V Jr, Ketterison ED (2001) Offspring sex ratio is unrelated to male attractiveness in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:312–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill JA, Enstrom DA, Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr, Ziegenfus C (1999) Mate choice based on static versus dynamic secondary sexual traits in the dark-eyed junco. Behav Ecol 10:91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holberton RL, Able KP, Wingfield JC (1989) Status signaling in dark-eyed juncos, Junco hyemalis: plumage manipulations and hormonal correlates of dominance. Anim Behav 37:681–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA (1995) Sexual selection, honest advertisement and the handicap principle: reviewing the evidence. Biol Rev 70:1–65

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karino K, Kobayashi M, Orita K (2006) Adaptive offspring sex ratio depends on male tail length in the guppy. Ethology 112:1050–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson ED (1979) Aggressive behavior in wintering dark-eyed juncos: determinants of dominance and their possible relation to geographic variation in sex ratio. Wilson Bull 91:371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketterson ED, Parker PG, Raouf SA, Nolan V Jr, Ziegnefus C, Chandler CR (1997) Relative importance of extra-pair fertilizations to male and female reproductive success in Dark-eyed Juncos. In: Parker PG, Burley NT (eds) Avian reproductive tactics: female and male perspectives. Ornithol Monogr 49, pp 81–101

  • Kölliker M, Heeb P, Werner I, Mateman AC, Lessells CM, Richner H (1999) Offspring sex ratio is related to male body size in the great tits (Parus major). Behav Ecol 10:68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsten P, Lessells CM, Mateman AC, van der Velde M, Komdeur J (2006) Primary sex ratio adjustment to experimentally reduced male UV attractiveness in blue tits. Behav Ecol 17:539–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech DI, Hartley IR, Stewart IRK, Griffith SC, Burke T (2001) No effect of parental quality or extrapair paternity on brood sex ratio in the blue tit (Parus caeruleus). Behav Ecol 12:674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Love OP, Chin EH, Wynne-Edwards KE, Williams TD (2005) Stress hormones: a link between maternal condition and sex-biased reproductive investment. Am Nat 166:751–766

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mazuc J, Chastel O, Sorci G (2003) No evidence for differential maternal allocation to offspring in the house sparrow (Passer domesticus). Behav Ecol 14:340–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGlothlin JW, Parker PG, Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED (2005) Correlational selection leads to genetic integration of body size and an attractive plumage trait in dark-eyed juncos. Evolution 59:658–671

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller A (1941) Speciation in the avian genus junco. Univ Calif Publ Zool 44:173–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Møller AP, Pomiankowski A (1993) Why have birds got multiple sexual ornaments? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 32:167–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Nager RG, Monaghan P, Griffiths R, Houston DC, Dawson R (1999) Experimental demonstration that offspring sex ratio varies with maternal condition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:570–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED, Cristol DA, Rogers CM, Clotfelter ED, Titus RC, Schoech SJ, Snajdr E (2002) Dark-eyed junco (Junco hyemalis). No. 716. In: Poole A, Gill F (eds) The birds of North America. Birds of North America, Philadelphia, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Oddie KR, Reim C (2002) Egg sex ratio and paternal traits: using within-individual comparisons. Behav Ecol 13:503–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pike TW, Petrie M (2006) Experimental evidence that corticosterone affects offspring sex ratios in quail. Proc R Soc Lond B 273:1093–1098

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raouf SA, Parker PG, Ketterson ED, Nolan V Jr, Ziegenfus C (1997) Testosterone affects reproductive success by influencing extra-pair fertilizations in male dark-eyed juncos (Aves: Junco hyemalis). Proc R Soc Lond B 264:1599–1603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rathburn MK, Montgomerie R (2004) Offspring sex ratios correlate with pair-male condition in a cooperatively breeding fairy-wren. Behav Ecol 16:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutstein AN, Gorman HE, Arnold KE, Gilbert L, Orr KJ, Adam A, Nager R, Graves JA (2005) Sex allocation in response to paternal attractiveness in the zebra finch. Behav Ecol 16:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saino N, Ellegren H, Moller AP (1999) No evidence for adjustment of sex-allocation in relation to parental ornamentation and paternity in barn swallows. Mol Ecol 11:1533–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulte-Hostedde AI, Zinner B, Millar JS, Hickling GJ (2005) Restitution of mass-size residuals: validating body condition indices. Ecology 86:155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC (2000) Differential allocation: tests, mechanisms and implications. Trends Ecol Evol 15:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon BC, Andersson S, Griffith SC, Ornborg J, Sendecka J (1999) Ultraviolet colour variation influences blue tit sex ratios. Nature 402:874–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC (1989) Trade-offs in life-history evolution. Funct Ecol 3:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres R, Velando A (2003) A dynamic trait affects continuous pair assessment in the blue-footed booby, Sula nebouxii. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 55:65–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers RI, Willard DE (1973) Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science 179:90–92

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • West SA, Sheldon BC (2002) Constraints in the evolution of sex ratio adjustment. Science 295:1685–1688

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Westerdahl H, Benshc S, Hansson B, Hasselquist D, Von Schantz T (1997) Sex ratio variation among broods of great reed warblers Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Mol Ecol 6:543–548

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westneat DF, Stewart IR, Woeste EH, Gipson J, Adulkadir L, Poston JP (2002) Patterns of sex ratio variation in House Sparrows. Condor 104:598–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K, Hardy ICW (2002) Statistical analysis of sex ratios an introduction. In: Hardy I (ed) Sex ratios: concepts and research methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 48–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf WL, Casto JM, Nolan V Jr, Ketterson ED (2004) Female ornamentation and male mate choice in dark-eyed juncos. Anim Behav 67:93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi N, Kawano KK (2001) Effect of body size on the resource holding potential in male Varied Tit (Parus varius). Jpn J Ornithol 50:65–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamaguchi N, Kawano KK, Kazuhiro E, Yahara T (2004) Facultative sex ratio adjustment in response to male tarsus length in the Varied Tit (Parus varius). Ibis 146:108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh PJ (2004) Rapid evolution of a plumage pattern following population establishment in a novel habitat. Evolution 58:166–174

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Laura Chiavola-Larson, Teresa Gonzalez, Aaron Johnson, Justin Mehlhaff, and Emily Sievers for the assistance in the field and Patrick Ferree for his advice on molecular work. For helpful comments, I acknowledge Alexis Chaine, Janis Dickinson, Dai Shizuka, Bruce Lyon, and the anonymous reviewers. This work was performed at the University of California Natural Reserve System (UCNRS) Sagehen Creek Field Station and supported by a Mildred E. Mathias UCNRS Graduate Student Research Grant, The American Museum of Natural History Chapman Memorial Fund, and the Achievement Reward for Collegiate Scientists Northern California chapter. Experiments were performed with appropriate federal, state, and university permits in compliance with current animal use regulations.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elise D. Ferree.

Additional information

Communicated by A. Cockburn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ferree, E.D. White tail plumage and brood sex ratio in dark-eyed juncos (Junco hyemalis thurberi). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62, 109–117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0443-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0443-x

Keywords

Navigation