Abstract
Aesthetic surgery is one pillar of plastic surgery. Thus, not surprisingly, journals exist that focus predominantly on advances within this subspecialty. However, rarely has the process of systematic reviewing that identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) been conducted within this subspecialty. All original articles published in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were analyzed to identify all RCTs and CCTs. The proportion of RCTs and CCTs in all original articles was determined, and the quality of reporting was assessed on the basis of established quality items. Additional parameters were investigated including reporting of statistically significant differences, type of institution, and country affiliation of the first author. Of the 1,048 original articles analyzed, 11 (1%) and 24 (2.3%) articles met the inclusion criteria for RCTs and CCTs, respectively. Only two studies were single blinded, whereas only one study reported on successful double blinding and appropriate allocation concealment. Notably, these trials were RCTs. Participant dropout was reported in one study. Statistically significant differences were reported in 18 trials, 6 of which were RCTs. The annual publication of RCTs has increased over the past 5 years. North America and Europe contributed a total of 28 controlled trials (80%). Controlled trials are being conducted in aesthetic surgery at a strikingly low rate. However, a recent increase in published RCTs reflects the recognition that performing outcome studies is pivotal in moving practice toward a foundation based on assessment by outcome. The quality of reporting, however, needs improvement.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman DG (1996) Better reporting of randomized controlled trials: The CONSORT statement. BMJ 313:570–571
Chalmers TC, Levin H, Sacks HS, Reitman D, Berrier J, Nagalingam R (1987) Meta-analysis of clinical trials as a scientific discipline: I. Control of bias and comparison with large cooperative trials. Stat Med 6:315–328
Galandi D, Schwarzer G, Antes G (2006) The demise of the randomized controlled trial: Bibliometric study of the German language health care literature, 1948 to 2004. BMC Med Res Methodol 6:30
Harbour R, Miller J (2001) A new system for grading recommendations in evidence-based guidelines. BMJ 323:334–336
Huemer GM, Bauer T, Gurunluoglu R, Sakho C, Oehlbauer M, Dunst KM (2004) Analysis of publications in three plastic surgery journals for the year 2002. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:1147–1154
Love JW (1975) Drugs and operations: Some important differences. JAMA 232:37–38
Maggard MA, O’Connell JB, Liu JH, Etzioni DA, Ko CY (2003) Sample size calculations in surgery: Are they done correctly? Surgery 134:275–279
Maran AG, Molony NC, Armstrong MW, Ah-See K (1997) Is there an evidence base for the practice of ENT surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 22:152–157
Momeni A, Becker A, Antes G, Diener M, Blümle A, Stark GB (2007) Evidence-based plastic surgery: Controlled trials in three plastic surgery journals (1990–2005). Anal Plast Surg (accepted)
Moss RL, Henry MC, Dimmitt RA, Rangel S, Geraghty N Skarsgard ED (2001) The role of prospective randomized clinical trials in pediatric surgery: state of the art? J Pediatr Surg 36:1182–1186
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72
Schulz KF, Grimes DA, Altman DG, Hayes RJ (1996) Blinding and exclusions after allocation in randomised controlled trials: Survey of published parallel group trials in obstetrics and gynaecology. BMJ 312:742–744
Sibbald B, Roland M (1998) Understanding controlled trials: Why are randomised controlled trials important? BMJ 316:201
Solomon MJ, McLeod RS (1995) Should we be performing more randomized controlled trials evaluating surgical operations? Surgery 118:459–467
Training manual for handsearchers. Prepared by: U.S. Cochrane Center, December 13, (2002)
van der Linden W (1980) Pitfalls in randomized surgical trials. Surgery 87:258–262
Van der Wijden CL, Overbeke JA (1995) Audit of reports of randomised clinical trials published in one journal over 45 years. BMJ 311:918
Veiga Filho J, Castro AA, Veiga DF, Juliano Y, Castilho HT, Rocha JL, Ferreira LM (2005) Quality of reports of randomized clinical trials in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 115:320–323
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Becker, A., Blümle, A., Antes, G. et al. Controlled Trials in Aesthetic Plastic Surgery: A 16-Year Analysis. Aesth Plast Surg 32, 359–362 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9075-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00266-007-9075-9