Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A New Framework for Spatio-temporal Climate Change Impact Assessment for Terrestrial Wildlife

  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe a first step framework for climate change species’ impact assessments that produces spatially and temporally heterogeneous models of climate impacts. Case study results are provided for great gray owl (Strix nebulosa) in Idaho as an example of framework application. This framework applies species-specific sensitivity weights to spatial and seasonal models of climate exposure to produce spatial and seasonal models of climate impact. We also evaluated three methods of calculating sensitivity by comparing spatial models of combined exposure and sensitivity. We found the methods used to calculated sensitivity showed little difference, except where sensitivity was directional (i.e., more sensitive to an increase in temperature than a decrease). This approach may assist in the development of State Wildlife Action Plans and other wildlife management plans in the face of potential future climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagne KE, Friggens MM, Finch DM (2011) A system for assessing vulnerability of species (SAVS) to climate change. Gen Tech Rep RMRS-GTR-257, USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, Colorado

  • Bull EL, Duncan JR (1993) Great gray owl (Strix nebulosa), the birds of North America Online. Cornell Lab of Ornithology. http://bna.birds.cornell.edu/bna/species/041. Accessed 10 Mar 2014

  • Calosi P, Bilton DT, Spicer JI (2008) Thermal tolerance, acclamatory capacity and vulnerability to global climate change. Biol Lett 4:99–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen I-C, Hill JK, Ohlemuller R, Roy DB, Thomas CD (2011) Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333:1024–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Climate Change Sensitivity Database [CCSD] (2014) Climate change sensitivity database homepage. http://climatechangesensitivity.org/. Accessed 25 Feb 2014

  • Creeden EP, Hicke JA, Buotte PC (2014) Climate, weather, and recent mountain pine beetle outbreaks in the western United States. For Ecol Manag 312:239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson A, Aycrigg J, Grossman E, Kagan J, Lennartz S, McDonough S, Miewald T, Ohmann J, Sajwaj T, Tolbaske C (2013) Chapter 2: land cover classification and mapping. In: Aycrigg JL, Andersen M, Beauvais G, Croft M, Davidson A, Duarte L, Kagan J, Keinath D, Lennartz S, Lonneker J, Miewald T, Ohmann J (eds) Ecoregional gap analysis of the northwestern United States: northwest gap analysis project draft report. U.S. Geological Survey Gap Analysis Program, Corvalis, Oregon, pp 31–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison JE, Coe S, Finch D, Rowland E, Friggens M, Graumlich LJ (2012) Bringing indices of species vulnerability to climate change into geographic space: an assessment across the Coronado national forest. Biodiv Conserv 21:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan JR, Hayward PH (1994) Review of technical knowledge: great gray owls. In: Hayward GD, Verner J (eds) Flammulated, boreal, and great gray owls in the United States: a technical conservation assessment. Gen Tech Rep RM-253. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado, pp 159–175

  • ESRI (2010) ArcMap 10.0. ESRI, Redlands

  • Fowler JH, Blenkinsop S, Tebaldi C (2007) Linking climate change modelling to impacts studies: recent advances in downscaling techniques for hydrological modelling. Natl J Climatol 27:1547–1578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin AB (1988) Breeding biology of the great gray owl in southeastern Idaho and northwestern Wyoming. Humboldt State University, Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardali T, Seavy NE, DiGaudio RT, Comrack LA (2012) A climate change vulnerability assessment of California’s at-risk birds. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal/pone/0029507

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick P, Stein BA, Edelson NA (eds) (2011) Scanning the conservation horizon: a guide to climate change vulnerability assessment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. part b: regional aspects. In: Barros VR, Field CB, Dokken DJ, Mastrandrea MD, Mach KJ, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Maxtrandrea PR, White LL (eds) Contribution of working group II to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunkel KE, Stevens LE, Stevens SE, Sun L, Janssen E, Wuebbles D, Redmond KT, Dobson JG (2013) Regional climate trends and scenarios for the US National Climate Assessments, Part 6. Climate of the Northwest U.S. NOAA Technical Report NESDIS 152-6, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce, Washington DC

  • Lankford AJ, Svancara LK, Lawler JJ, Vierling K (2014) Comparison of climate change vulnerability assessments for wildlife. Wildl Soc Bull 32:386–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNulty SG, Aber JD (2001) US national climate change assessment on forest ecosystems: an introduction. Bioscience 51:720–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mote PW, Salathé EP (2010) Future climate in the Pacific Northwest. Clim Chang 102:29–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mote PW, Hamlet AF, Clark MP, Lettenmajer DP (2005) Declining mountain snowpack in Western North America. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 86:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DA (2004) Quantification of modeling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nolin AW, Daly C (2006) Mapping “at risk” snow in the Pacific Northwest. J Hydrometeorol 7:1164–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C (2006) Ecological and evolutionary responses to recent climate change. Annu Rev Ecol Evol S 37:637–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root TL, MacMynowski DP, Mastrandrea MD, Schneider SJ (2005) Human-modified temperatures induce species changes: joint attribution. PNAS 102:7465–7469

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rupp DE, Abatzoglou JT, Hegewisch KC, Mote PW (2013) Evaluation of CMIP4 20th century climate simulations for the Pacific Northwest USA. J Geophys Res 118:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Salathé EP, Mote PW, Wiley MW (2007) Review of scenario selection and downscaling methods for the assessment of climate change impacts on hydrology in the United States pacific northwest. Int J Climatol 27:1611–1621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JM, Peterson CR, Karl JW, Strand E, Svancara LK, Wright NM (2002) A gap analysis of Idaho: final report. Idaho Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafer S (2013) US Geoglogical survey, written communication

  • Small-Lorenz SL, Culp LA, Ryder B, Will TC, Marra PP (2013) A blind spot in climate change vulnerability assessments. Nat Clim Chang 3:91–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabor K, Williams JW (2010) Globally downscaled climate projections for assessing the conservation impacts of climate change. Ecol Appl 20:554–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuiller W, Albert C, Araújo MB, Berry PM, Cabeza M, Guison A, Hickler T, Midgley GF, Paterson J, Schurr FM, Sykes MT, Zimmermann NE (2008) Predicting global change impacts on plant species’ distributions: future challenges. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 9:137–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weed AS, Ayres MP, Hicke JA (2013) Consequences of climate change for biotic disturbances in North American forests. Ecol Monogr 83:441–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Charles SP, Zorita E, Timbal B, Whetton P, Mearns LO (2004) Guidelines for use of climate scenarios developed from statistical downscaling methods. Supporting material of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, available from the DDC of IPCC TGCIA

  • Willams JW, Jackson ST (2007) Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Paleoecology 5:475–482

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams SE, Shoo LP, Isaac JL, Joffmann AA, Langham G (2008) Towards an integrated framework for assessing the vulnerability of species to climate change. PLoS Biol. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060325

    Google Scholar 

  • Young B, Byers E, Gravuer K, Hall K, Hammerson G, Reder A (2011) Guidelines for using the NatureServe climate change vulnerability index. Release 2.1. NatureServe, Arlington

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Fish and Wildlife Ecology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID, 83843, USA

    Amber J. Lankford-Bingle & Kerri Vierling

  2. Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Moscow, ID, 83843, USA

    Leona K. Svancara

Authors
  1. Amber J. Lankford-Bingle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Leona K. Svancara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kerri Vierling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amber J. Lankford-Bingle.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lankford-Bingle, A.J., Svancara, L.K. & Vierling, K. A New Framework for Spatio-temporal Climate Change Impact Assessment for Terrestrial Wildlife. Environmental Management 56, 1514–1527 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0583-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0583-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation