Abstract
Background
The goal of the present study was to critically review and identify the strength of available evidence in the literature on the use of laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) in complicated appendicitis (CA).
Methods
The Cochrane Library and Controlled Trials Registry, MEDLINE (Ovid), PubMed, Web of knowledge, and SCOPUS databases were electronically searched, using the keywords “appendectomy,” “laparoscopy,” “appendicitis.” “complicated appendicitis.” “gangrenous appendicitis,” “perforated appendicitis,” with English language as a limit. Backward chaining was also employed. The NHS Public Health Resource Unit Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Tools were used for critical appraisal.
Results
Twelve retrospective case-control studies were included in the review. Overall methodological quality was moderate to poor, with heterogeneity, absence of randomization and blinding, and presence of important methodological flaws. Meta-analysis showed that LA in CA has reduced surgical site infection (SSI) rates compared to open appendectomy (OA), odds ratio (OR) 0.23, 95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.14–0.37 (level 3a evidence), and no difference with regard to intra-abdominal abscess (IAA) complication rates OR: 1.02, 95% CI 0.56–1.86 (level 3a evidence).
Conclusions
When compared to OA, laparoscopic appendectomy is advantageous in CA with regard to SSIs, with no significant additional risk of IAA (level 3a evidence).
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rosenberg W, Donald A (1995) Evidence based medicine: an approach to problem solving. BMJ 310:1122–1126
Williams NMA, Everson NW, Jackson D, Johnstone JM (1998) Is the incidence of acute appendicitis really falling? Ann R Coll Surg Engl 80:122–124
Addiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV (1990) The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol 132:910–925
Livingston E, Woodward W, Sarosi GA, Haley RW (2007) Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis. Implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg 245:886–892
Oliak D, Yamini D, Udani V, Lewis RJ, Vargas H, Arnell T, Stamos M (2007) Can perforated appendicitis be diagnosed pre-operatively based on admission factors? J Gastrointest Surg 4:470–474
Humes DJ, Simpson J (2006) Acute appendicitis. BMJ 333:530–534
Blomqvist PG, Anderson RE, Granath F, Lambe MP, Ekborn AR (2001) Mortality after appendectomy in Sweden, 1987–1996. Ann Surg 233:455–460
McBurney C (1894) The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating. Ann Surg 20:38
Semm K (1983) Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 15:59–64
Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EAM (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy for suspected appendicitis (review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews Issue 3. Art. No CD001546. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001546.pub2
Pedersen AG, Petersen OB, Wara P, Renning H, Qvist N, Laurberg S (2001) Randomised control trial of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Br J Surg 88:200–205
Fukami Y, Hasegawa H, Sakamoto E, Komatsu S, Hiromatsu T (2007) Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 31:93–97
Kirshtein B, Bayme M, Domchik S, Mizrahi S, Lantsberg L (2007) Complicated appendicitis: laparoscopic or conventional surgery? World J Surg 31:744–749
NHS P H R U (2008) Critical Appraisal Skills Programme—10 questions to help you make sense of randomised control trials. Accessed 17 January 2009
NHS P H R U (2008) Critical Appraisal Skills Programme—10 questions to help you make sense of a case control study. Accessed 17 January 2009
Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008] The Cochrane Collaboration. www.cochrane-handbook.org
Centre TNC, Review Manager (RevMan). 2008 The Cochrane Collaboration: Copenhagen
Oxford Centre of Evidence Based Medcine (2009) Levels of evidence. Accessed April 2009
Sileri P, Gentileschi P, Sica GS, Rossi P, Franceschilli L, Perrone F, Gaspari AL (2008) Abstract: laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract 2008 Abstracts T1715:A–883
Cueto J, D’Allemagne B, Vazquez-Frias JA, Gomez S, Delgado F, Trullenque L, Fajardo R, Valencia S, Poggi L, Balli J, Diaz J, Gonzalez R, Mansur JH, Franklin ME (2006) Morbidity of laparoscopic surgery for complicated appendicitis: an international study. Surg Endosc 20:717–720
Kiriakopoulos A, Tsakayiannis D, Linos D (2006) Laparoscopic management of complicated appendicitis. J Soc Lap Surg 10:453–456
Towfigh S, Chen F, Mason R, Katkhouda N, Chan L, Berne T (2006) Laparoscopic appendectomy significantly reduces length of stay for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 20:495–499
Mancini GJ, Mancini ML, Nelson HS (2005) Efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy in appendicitis with peritonitis. Am Surg 71:1–4
Ball CG, Kortbeek JB, Kirkpatrick AW, Mitchell P (2004) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of post-operative factors. Surg Endosc 18:969–973
Johnston AB, Peetz ME (1998) Laparoscopic appendectomy is an acceptable alternative for the treatment of perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 12:940–943
Lachin JM, Matts JP, Wei LJ (1988) Randomisation in clinical trials: conclusions and recommendations. Control Clin Trial 9:365–374
Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002) Blinding in randomised trials: hiding who got what. Lancet 359:696–700
Schulz KF, Grimes DA (2002) Allocation concealment in randomised trials: defending against deciphering. Lancet 359:614–618
Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V (2007) Complicated appendicitis—is the laparoscopic approach appropriate? A comparative study with the open approach: Outcome in a community hospital setting. Am Surg 73:737–741
Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GPC, Li MKW (2007) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 205:60–65
Katsuno G, Nagakari K, Yoshikawa S, Sugiyama K, Fukunaga M (2009) Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy. World J Surg 33:208–214
Piksun G, Kozic D, Rajpal S, Shaftan G, Fogler R (2001) Comparison of laparoscopic, open and converted appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. Surg Endosc 15:660–662
Stoltzing H, Thon K (2000) Perforated appendicitis: is laparoscopic operation adviseable? Digest Surg 17:610–616
Wullstein C, Barkhausen S, Gross E (2001) Results of laparoscopic vs conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis. Dis Colon Rectum 44:1700–1705
Guller U, Hervey S, Purves H, Muhlbaier LH, Peterson ED, Eubanks E, Pietrobon P (2004) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy. Outcomes comparison based on a large administrative database. Ann Surg 239:43–52
So JBY, Chiong E-C, Chiong E, Cheah W-K, Lomanto D, Goh P, Kum C-K (2002) Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 26:1485–1488
Lin H-F, Wu J-M, Tseng L-M, Chen K-H, Huang S-H, Lai I-R (2006) Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for perforated appendicitis. J Gastrointest Surg 10:906–910
Brewer M (2000) Research design and issues of validity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Henry MC, Moss RL (2005) Primary versus delayed wound closure in complicated appendicitis: an international systematic review and meta-analysis. Ped Surg Intern 21:625–630
Greenwood PE, Nikulin MS (1996) A Guide to Chi-Squared Testing. Wiley, New York
Fisher RA (1922) On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. J R Stat Soc 85:87–94
Lachin JM (2000) Statistical considerations in the intent-to-treat principle. Control Clin Trial 21:167–189
Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Khalili TM, Hiatt JR, Savar A, Lau C, Margulies DR (1999) Perforated appendicitis is not a contraindication to laparoscopy. Am Surg 65:965–967
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Markides, G., Subar, D. & Riyad, K. Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy in Adults with Complicated Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World J Surg 34, 2026–2040 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0669-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0669-z