Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparison of Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the United States in the Past Decade

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is national-level comparison of the endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OAR) of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) in the United States from 2001 to 2010.

Methods

The data were obtained from nationwide inpatient sample from the Department of Health and Human Services. Ruptured AAA treated by OAR or EVAR were selected using combination ICD-9 codes.

Results

There were 42,126 cases of ruptured AAA of which 8,140 (19.3 %) were repaired by EVAR. EVAR patients were older (74.1 vs. 72.8 years, p < 0.001) and had higher incidence of comorbidities compared with OAR group. EVAR patients had lower in-hospital mortality (25.9 vs. 39.1 %, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stay (10.4 vs. 13.7 days, p < 0.001). More patients were discharged home following EVAR (36.8 vs. 21.5 %, p < 0.001). There was reduced need for institutional rehabilitation following EVAR (26.3 vs. 29.1 %, p < 0.001). Females had significantly higher mortality compared with males after both EVAR (32.2 vs. 24.1 %, p < 0.001) and OAR (46.2 vs. 36.9 %, p < 0.001). The hospital mortality (41.3–25.8 %, p < 0.001) and mean length of stay (11.8–9.7 days, p < 0.01) of EVAR steadily improved over the study period.

Conclusions

National level comparison of data from the past decade shows that in suitable cases, EVAR for ruptured AAA is associated with reduced hospital mortality, shorter hospital stay, and reduced need for rehabilitation. EVAR outcomes showed consistent improvement with time. Regardless of the type of repair, women had higher mortality compared with men.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albuquerque FC Jr, Tonnessen BH, Noll RE Jr, Cires G, Kim JK, Sternbergh WC 3rd (2010) Paradigm shifts in the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm: trends in 721 patients between 1996 and 2008. J Vasc Surg 51(6):1348–1352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenhalgh RM, Brown LC, Kwong GP, Powell JT, Thompson SG (2004) EVAR trial participants. Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 364:843–848

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Prinssen M, Verhoeven EL, Buth J, Cuypers PW, van Sambeek MR, Balm R, Buskens E, Grobbee DE, Blankensteijn JD (2004) Dutch Randomized Endovascular Aneurysm Management (DREAM)Trial Group. A randomized trial comparing conventional and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. N Engl J Med 351:1607–1618

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yusuf SW, Whitaker SC, Chuter TA, Wenham PW, Hopkinson BR (1994) Emergency endovascular repair of leaking aortic aneurysm. Lancet 344(8937):1645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peppelenbosch N, Yilmaz N, van Marrewijk C, Buth J, Cuypers P, Duijm L, Tielbeek A (2003) Emergency treatment of acute symptomatic or ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. Outcome of a prospective intent-to-treat by EVAR protocol. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 26(3):303–310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore R, Nutley M, Cina CS, Motamedi M, Faris P, Abuznadah W (2007) Improved survival after introduction of an emergency endovascular therapy protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 45(3):443–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Verhoeven EL, Kapma MR, Groen H, Tielliu IF, Zeebregts CJ, Bekkema F, van den Dungen JJ (2008) Mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with open or endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 48(6):1396–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coppi G, Silingardi R, Gennai S, Saitta G, Ciardullo AV (2006) A single-center experience in open and endovascular treatment of hemodynamically unstable and stable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 44:1140–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Steiner C, Elixhauser A, Schnaier J (2002) The healthcare cost and utilization project: an overview. Eff Clin Pract 5:143–151

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. On-line HCUP overview course. Available at http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/overviewcourse.jsp. Accessed 2 Oct 2011

  11. Cuypers PW, Gardien M, Buth J, Peels CH, Charbon JA, Hop WC (2001) Randomized study comparing cardiac response in endovascular and open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 88:1059–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moore R, Nutley M, Cina CS, Motamedi M, Faris P, Abuznadah W (2007) Improved survival after introduction of an emergency endovascular therapy protocol for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 45:443–450

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Verhoeven EL, Kapma MR, Groen H, Tielliu IF, Zeebregts CJ, Bekkema F, van den Dungen JJ (2008) Mortality of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm treated with open or endovascular repair. J Vasc Surg 48:1396–1400

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McPhee J, Eslami MH, Arous EJ, Messina LM, Schanzer A (2009) Endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States (2001–2006): a significant survival benefit over open repair is independently associated with increased institutional volume. J Vasc Surg 49(4):817–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lesperance K, Andersen C, Singh N, Starnes B, Martin MJ (2008) Expanding use of emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: disparities in outcomes from a nationwide perspective. J Vasc Surg 47(6):1165–1170

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hinchliffe RJ, Bruijstens L, MacSweeney ST, Braithwaite BD (2006) A randomised trial of endovascular and open surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: results of a pilot study and lessons learned for future studies. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 32(5):506–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Peppelenbosch N, Geelkerken RH, Soong C, Cao P, Steinmetz OK, Teijink JA, Lepäntalo M, De Letter J, Vermassen FE, DeRose G, Buskens E, Buth J (2006) Endograft treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms using the Talent Aortouniiliac system: an international multicenter study. J Vasc Surg 43(3):1111–1123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coppi G, Silingardi R, Gennai S, Saitta G, Ciardullo AV (2006) A single-center experience in open and endovascular treatment of hemodynamically unstable and stable patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 44:1140–1147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lachat ML, Pfammatter T, Witzke HJ, Bettex D, Künzli A, Wolfensberger U, Turina MI (2002) Endovascular repair with bifurcated stent-grafts under local anaesthesia to improve outcome of ruptured aortoiliac aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 23(6):528–536

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Veith FJ, Ohki T, Lipsitz EC, Suggs WD, Cynamon J (2003) Treatment of ruptured abdominal aneurysms with stent grafts: a new gold standard? Semin Vasc Surg 16(2):171–175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gorham TJ, Taylor J, Raptis S (2004) Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Br J Surg 91:815–827

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mehta M, Taggert J, Darling RC 3rd, Chang BB, Kreienberg PB, Paty PS, Roddy SP, Sternbach Y, Ozsvath KJ, Shah DM (2006) Establishing a protocol for endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: outcomes of a prospective analysis. J Vasc Surg 44(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Veith FJ, Lachat M, Mayer D, Malina M, Holst J, Mehta M, Verhoeven EL, Larzon T, Gennai S, Coppi G, Lipsitz EC, Gargiulo NJ, van der Vliet JA, Blankensteijn J, Buth J, Lee WA, Biasi G, Deleo G, Kasirajan K, Moore R, Soong CV, Cayne NS, Farber MA, Raithel D, Greenberg RK, van Sambeek MR, Brunkwall JS, Rockman CB, Hinchliffe RJ (2009) RAAA investigators. Collected world and single center experience with endovascular treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Surg 250(5):818–824

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharif MA, Lee B, Makar RR, Loan W, Soong CV (2007) Role of the Hardman index in predicting mortality for open and endovascular repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Endovasc Ther 14(4):528–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Anain PM, Anain JM Sr, Tiso M, Nader ND, Dosluoglu HH (2007) Early and mid-term results of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the endovascular era in a community hospital. J Vasc Surg 46(5):898–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2005) Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm: recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 142(3):198–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mehta M, Byrne WJ, Robinson H, Roddy SP, Paty PS, Kreienberg PB, Feustel P, Darling RC 3rd (2012) Women derive less benefit from elective endovascular aneurysm repair than men. J Vasc Surg 55(4):906–913

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abedi NN, Davenport DL, Xenos E, Sorial E, Minion DJ, Endean ED (2009) Gender and 30-day outcome in patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR): an analysis using the ACS NSQIP dataset. J Vasc Surg 50(3):486–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Hertzer NR, O’Hara PJ, Mascha EJ, Krajewski LP, Sullivan TM, Beven EG (1997) Early outcome assessment for 2228 consecutive carotid endarterectomy procedures: the Cleveland Clinic experience from 1989 to 1995. J Vasc Surg 26:1–10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Enzler MA, Ruoss M, Seifert B, Berger M (1996) The influence of gender on the outcome of arterial procedures in the lower extremity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 11:446–452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Franks SC, Sutton AJ, Bown MJ, Sayers RD (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of 12 years of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 33:154–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ricotta JJ 2nd, Malgor RD, Oderich GS (2009) Endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: part I. Ann Vasc Surg 23:799–812

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mehta M, Kreienberg PB, Roddy SP, Paty PS, Taggert JB, Sternbach Y, Hnath J, Ozsvath KJ, Chang BB, Shah DM, Darling RC 3rd (2010) Ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm: endovascular program development and results. Semin Vasc Surg 23(4):206–212

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Prasoon P. Mohan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mohan, P.P., Hamblin, M.H. Comparison of Endovascular and Open Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm in the United States in the Past Decade. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37, 337–342 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0665-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-013-0665-4

Keywords

Navigation