Skip to main content
Log in

Atypical branching of the musculocutaneous and median nerves with associated unusual innervation of muscles in the anterior compartment of the arm: case report and plea for extension of the current classification system

  • Anatomic Variations
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Variations of the peripheral nervous system in the upper limb, especially of the musculocutaneous and median nerves, are common, but closer attention to the knowledge of the variant anatomy should be paid to avoid iatrogenic injury or to understand the unusual clinical signs.

Methods

During a routine dissection course, bilateral variations were observed in a Central European male cadaver.

Results

Variable branching of the musculocutaneous and median nerves associated with atypical innervation of the muscles in the anterior compartment of the arm and other concomitant variations were found bilaterally. In both cases, the musculocutaneous nerve innervated only the coracobrachialis muscle and terminated inside the muscle belly. Branches to the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles arose either directly from the median nerve or its branches. On the right side, two communicating branches between the roots of the median nerve were noted, and a common medial cutaneous trunk originated from the lateral cord. On the left side, a communicating branch extended from the lateral cord to the medial root of the median nerve and a tributary to the axillary vein passed through a window formed by the roots of the median nerve and the communicating branch.

Conclusion

There exist only few cases in the literature describing similar variations, but the present arrangement has not yet been reported to the best of our knowledge. With the proposed extension to the existing classification system, we aim to provide clearer orientation in the variability of the musculocutaneous and median nerves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Budhiraja V, Rastogi R, Asthana AK, Sinha P, Krishna A, Trivedi V (2011) Concurrent variations of median and musculocutaneous nerves and their clinical correlation—a cadaveric study. Ital J Anat Emryol 116(2):67–72

    Google Scholar 

  2. Caetano EB, Viera LA, Cavalheiro CS, Filho MR, Almagro MAP, Caetano MF (2016) Anatomic study of the nervous communication between the median and musculocutaneous nerve. Acta Ortop Bras 24(4):200–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke E, Wysiadecki G, Haladaj R, Skrzat J (2019) Fusion between the median and musculocutaneous nerve: a case study. Folia Med Cracov 59(3):45–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fazan PS, Amadeu AS, Caleffi AL, Filho OAR (2003) Brachial plexus variations in its formation and main branches. Acta Cir Bras 18(5):14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Guerri-Guttenberg RA, Ingolotti M (2009) Classifying musculocutaneous nerve variations. Clin Anat 22(6):671–683

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gümüsburun E, Adigüzel E (2000) A variation of the brachial plexus characterized by the absence of the musculocutaneous nerve: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 22(1):63–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Le Minor JM (1990) A rare variation of the median and musculocutaneous nerve in man. Arch Anat Histol Embryol 73:33–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leng L, Liu H, Wang T, Liu L, Si D (2016) Classifying musculocutaneous nerve variations depending on the origin. J Neurol Disord 4(4):100276

    Google Scholar 

  9. Maeda S, Kawai K, Koizumi M, Ide J, Tokiyoshi A, Mizuta H, Kodama K (2009) Morphological study of the communication between the musculocutaneous and median nerves. Anat Sci Int 84(1):34–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Nakatani T, Mizukami S, Tanaka S (1997) Three cases of the musculocutaneous nerve not perforating the coracobrachialis muscle. Kaibogaku Zasshi 72(3):191–194

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nene AR (2010) Why are medial cord variations seen infrequently? Eur J Anat 14(2):59–65

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pacholzcak R, Klimek-Piotrowska W, Walocha JA (2011) Absence of the musculocutaneous nerve associated with a supernumerary head of biceps brachii: a case report. Surg Radiol Anat 33(6):551–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Parchand MP, Patil ST (2013) Absence of musculocutaneous nerve with variations in course and distribution of the median nerve. Anat Sci Int 88(1):58–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Patil DA, Jadhav AS, Bhingardeve CV, Katti AS (2016) Variation in the formation, communication and distribution of median nerve: a cadaveric study. Asian Pac J Health Sci 3(4):17–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prasada Rao PVV, Chaudhary SC (2001) Absence of musculocutaneous nerve: two case reports. Clin Anat 14(1):31–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ranjan P, Bhuiyan PS (2020) A study of variation in median nerve formation in cadavers. Int J Anat Res 8(1.3):7395–7398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Raza K, Singh S, Rani N, Mishra R, Mehta K, Kaler S (2017) Anomalous innervation of the median nerve in the arm in the absence of the musculocutaneous nerve. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 17(1):e106-108

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors sincerely thank those who donated their bodies to science, so that anatomical research could be performed. Results from such research can potentially increase mankind's overall knowledge that can then improve patient care. Therefore, these donors and their families deserve our highest gratitude. Namely, the authors thank Kamila Bartošková for leading the student dissection of the cadaver, Václava van der Meijs for assistance while compiling the data and Griffin Trau for English language corrections. Special appreciation is addressed to the anonymous reviewers whose valuable comments improved this manuscript.

Funding

The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MB: data collection, data analysis, and manuscript writing/editing. DK: project development, data collection, and manuscript writing/editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Kachlik.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethics approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Benes, M., Kachlik, D. Atypical branching of the musculocutaneous and median nerves with associated unusual innervation of muscles in the anterior compartment of the arm: case report and plea for extension of the current classification system. Surg Radiol Anat 43, 671–678 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02731-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-021-02731-8

Keywords

Navigation