Abstract
This paper concerns ODE modeling of the hypothalamic–pituitary– adrenal axis (HPA axis) using an analytical and numerical approach, combined with biological knowledge regarding physiological mechanisms and parameters. The three hormones, CRH, ACTH, and cortisol, which interact in the HPA axis are modeled as a system of three coupled, nonlinear differential equations. Experimental data shows the circadian as well as the ultradian rhythm. This paper focuses on the ultradian rhythm. The ultradian rhythm can mathematically be explained by oscillating solutions. Oscillating solutions to an ODE emerges from an unstable fixed point with complex eigenvalues with a positive real parts and a non-zero imaginary parts. The first part of the paper describes the general considerations to be obeyed for a mathematical model of the HPA axis. In this paper we only include the most widely accepted mechanisms that influence the dynamics of the HPA axis, i.e. a negative feedback from cortisol on CRH and ACTH. Therefore we term our model the minimal model. The minimal model, encompasses a wide class of different realizations, obeying only a few physiologically reasonable demands. The results include the existence of a trapping region guaranteeing that concentrations do not become negative or tend to infinity. Furthermore, this treatment guarantees the existence of a unique fixed point. A change in local stability of the fixed point, from stable to unstable, implies a Hopf bifurcation; thereby, oscillating solutions may emerge from the model. Sufficient criteria for local stability of the fixed point, and an easily applicable sufficient criteria guaranteeing global stability of the fixed point, is formulated. If the latter is fulfilled, ultradian rhythm is an impossible outcome of the minimal model and all realizations thereof. The second part of the paper concerns a specific realization of the minimal model in which feedback functions are built explicitly using receptor dynamics. Using physiologically reasonable parameter values, along with the results of the general case, it is demonstrated that un-physiological values of the parameters are needed in order to achieve local instability of the fixed point. Small changes in physiologically relevant parameters cause the system to be globally stable using the analytical criteria. All simulations show a globally stable fixed point, ruling out periodic solutions even when an investigation of the ‘worst case parameters’ is performed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen LJS (2007) An introduction to mathematical biology. Pearson Education, Inc
Andersen M, Vinther F (2010) Mathematical modeling of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, IMFUFA tekst 469. Roskilde University, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark. http://milne.ruc.dk/imfufatekster/pdf/469.pdf
Bairagi N, Chatterjee S, Chattopadhyay J (2008) Variability in the secretion of corticotropin-releasing hormone adrenocortcotropic hormone and cortisol and understanding of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis—a mathematical study based on clinical evidence. Math Med Biol 25: 37–63
Ben-Zvi A, Vernon SD, Broderick G (2009) Model-based therapeutic correction of hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis dysfunction. PLoS Comput Biol 5:e1000273
Bingzhenga L, Zhenye Z, Liansong C (1990) A mathematical model of the regulation system of the secretion of glucocorticoids. J Biol Phys 17(4): 221–233
Carroll BJ, Cassidy F, Naftolowitz D, Tatham NE, Wilson WH, Iranmanesh A, Liu PY, Veldhuis JD (2007) Pathophysiology of hypercortisolism in depression. Acta Psychiatr Scand 115: 90–103
Christensen KC, Hannesson K, Hansen DF, Jensen LF, Nielsen KHM (2007) Matematisk modellering af hpa-aksen. Master’s thesis, Roskilde Universitet, Universitetsvej 1, 4000 Roskilde, Denmark
Chrousos G (1998) Editorial: ultradian, circadian, and stress-related hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activity—a dynamic digital-to-analog modulation. Endocrinology 139: 437–440
Conrad M, Hubold C, Fischer B, Peters A (2009) Modeling the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal system: homeostasis by interacting positive and negative feedback. J Biol Phys 35: 149–162
de Kloet ER, Vreugdenhil E, Oitzl MS, Joels M (1998) Brain corticosteroid receptor balance in health and disease. Endocr Rev 19(3): 269–301
Felig P, Frohman LA (2001) Endocrinology and metabolism, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York
Griffin JE, Ojeda SR (2004) Textbook of endocrine physiology, 5th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Gupta S, Aslakson E, Gurbaxani BM, Vernon SD (2007) Inclusion of the glucocorticoid receptor in a hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis model reveals bistability. Theor Biol Med Model 4: 8
Hashimoto K, Nishioka T, Numata Y, Ogasa T, Kageyama J, Suemaru S (1993) Plasma levels of corticotropin-releasing hormone in hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal disorders and chronic renal failure. Acta Endocrinol 128(6): 503–507
Jelic S, Cupic Z, Kolar-Anic L (2005) Mathematical modeling of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal system activity. Math Biosci 197: 173–187
Keenan DM, Veldhuis JD (2003) Cortisol feedback state governs adrenocorticotropin secretory-burst shape, frequency, and mass in a dual-waveform construct: time of day-dependent regulation. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: 950–961
Keenan DM, Licinio J, Veldhuis JD (2001) A feedback-controlled ensemble model of the stress-responsive hypothalamo-pituitaryadrenal axis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(7): 4028–4033
Kyrylov V, Severyanova LA, Zhiliba A (2004) The ultradian pulsatility and nonlinear effects in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. In: The 2004 international conference on health sciences simulation (HSS 2004), San Diego, California
Kyrylov V, Severyanova LA, Vieira A (2005) Modeling robust oscillatory behaviour of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 52: 1977–1983
Landau L, Lifshitz E (2008) Course of theoretical physics, vol 5. Statistical physics 3rd edn, part 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Liu YW, Hu ZH, Peng JH, Liu BZ (1999) A dynamical model for the pulsatile secretion of the hypothalamo-pituary-adrenal axis. Math Comput Model 29(4): 103–110
Murray J (2002) Mathematical biology. Part I: an introduction, 3rd edn. Springer, New York
Savic D, Jelic S (2005) A mathematical model of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical system and its stability analysis. Chaos Solitons Fractals 26: 427–436
Savic D, Jelic S (2006) Stability of a general delay differential model of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical system. Int J Bifurcation Chaos 16: 3079–3085
Tortora GJ, Derrickson B (2006) Principles of anatomy and physiology, 11th edn. Wiley, New York
Veldhuis JD, Iranmanesh A, Lizarralde G, Johnson ML (1989) Amplitude modulation of a burstlike mode of cortisol secretion subserves the circadian glucocorticoid rhythm. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 257: 6–14
Wilson JD, Foster DW (1992) Williams textbook of endocrinology, 8th edn. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vinther, F., Andersen, M. & Ottesen, J.T. The minimal model of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis. J. Math. Biol. 63, 663–690 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-010-0384-2
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00285-010-0384-2