Abstract
The purpose of this study is to adapt the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) to Turkish language and to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version in patients with primary hip osteoarthritis. After the translation from the source language (English) to the target language (Turkish), synthesis, back translation, revision, and pretest stages were done. Next, 50 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis were asked to fill out the Turkish version of the HOOS-PS two times with one week interval. Internal consistency was tested using the Cronbach’s alpha coefficient, and test–retest reliability was assessed by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was investigated by comparing the results of the HOOS-PS and WOMAC, Lequesne questionnaries using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. Internal consistency was good with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.778 (>0.7) and ICC was 0.911 (>0.7). Both scores verify that the Turkish HOOS-PS is a reliable tool. Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between the HOOS-PS and overall WOMAC (r = 0.653), WOMAC physical functions (r = 0.626), WOMAC pain (r = 0.629) subscales, overall Lequesne (r = 0.650), and Lequesne daily living activities (r = 0.620) subscales were high (r > 0.6), and moderate correlations were found between the HOOS-PS and WOMAC stiffness (r = 0.511), Lequesne pain (r = 0.569), and Lequesne-walking distance (r = 0.578) subscales (0.6 > r > 0.2), thus providing proof for the validity of the Turkish form. The Turkish HOOS-PS was found to be reliable and valid for patients with primary hip osteoarthritis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Klässbo M, Larsson E, Mannevik E (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Scand J Rheumatol 32(1):46–51
Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Tennant A, Hawker GA, Conaghan PG, Roos EM, Jordan JM, Maillefert JF, Dougados M, Lohmander LS (2008) The development of a short measure of physical function for hip OA HOOS-Physical Function Shortform (HOOS-PS): an OARSI/OMERACT initiative. Osteoarthr Cartil 16(5):551–559
Davis AM, Perruccio AV, Canizares M, Hawker GA, Roos EM, Maillefert JF, Lohmander LS (2009) Comparative, validity and responsiveness of the HOOS-PS and KOOS-PS to the WOMAC physical function subscale in total joint replacement for osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil 17(7):843–847
Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klässbo M, Roos EM (2003) Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)–validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 30(4):10
Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed quidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 46(12):1417–1432
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine 25(24):3186–3191
Altman R, Alarcón G, Appelrouth D, Bloch D, Borenstein D, Brandt K, Brown C, Cooke TD, Daniel W, Feldman D et al (1991) The American College of Rheumatology criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis of the hip. Arthritis Rheum 34(5):505–514
Ravaud P, Daugados M (1997) Radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 24(4):786–791
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 15(12):1833–1840
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW (1988) Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. J Orthop Rheumatol 1:95–108
Bellamy N (2010) WOMAC Osteoarthritis Index A User’s Guide IV. London
Tuzun EH, Eker L, Aytar A, Daskapan A, Bayramoglu M (2005) Acceptability, reliability, validity and responsiveness of the Turkish version of WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Osteoarthr Cartil 13(1):28–33
Lequesne MG, Samson S (1991) Indices in severity of osteoarthritis of weight bearing joints. J Rheumatol 18:16–18
Basaran S, Guzel R, Seydaoglu G, Guler F (2010) Validity, reliability, and comparison of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index and Lequesne algofunctional index in Turkish patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis. Clin Rheumatol 29:749–756
DeVon HA, Block ME, Moyle-Wright P (2007) A psychometric toolbox for testing validity and reliability. J Nurs Scholarsh 39(2):155–164
Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG (2001) Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences, 5th edn. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA
Ornetti P, Perruccio AV, Roos EM, Lohmander LS, Davis AM, Maillefert JF (2009) Psychometric properties of the French translation of the reduced KOOS and HOOS (KOOS-PS and HOOS-PS). Osteoarthr Cartil 17(12):1604–1608
van Dijk GM, Veenhof C, Lankhorst GJ, Dekker J (2009) Limitations in activities in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: the relationship with body functions, comorbidity and cognitive functioning. Disabil Rehabil 31(20):1685–1691
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendices
Appendix 1: Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)—Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS) English Version
Appendix 2: Kalça Yetersizliği ve Osteoartrit Sonuç Skoru (HOOS)—Fiziksel Fonksiyon Kısa Form (HOOS-PS) İngilizce Versiyonu
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yilmaz, O., Gul, E.D. & Bodur, H. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score–Physical function Short-form (HOOS-PS). Rheumatol Int 34, 43–49 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-013-2854-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-013-2854-5