Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

MR-guided discography using an open 1 Tesla MRI system

  • Interventional
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility of MR-guided discography using an open 1 Tesla MRI system.

Methods

48 disc segments of 41 patients scheduled for intradiscal thermal treatment, total disc replacement or spondylodesis were examined. A 1.0-T open MRI was used for instrument guidance and imaging. After primary disc puncture under guidance of interactive PDw TSE imaging, 1–2 ml of gadolinium contrast saline mixture was injected into the disc. The occurrence of memory pain during injection was recorded. Axial and sagittal T1w TSE images with and without fat saturation were obtained. All MRI discograms were analysed by two readers, who were blinded to the clinical findings.

Results

Overall, the placement of the puncture needle in the targeted disc was accurate under real-time MR guidance. Injections were technically successful in all cases. No major complications occurred. The mean procedure time was 17 min (range 13–34 min). Image quality of contrast-enhanced MR discograms was excellent when using an optimized gadolinium contrast saline mixture of 1:600. Memory pain was detected in 16 out of 48 affected segments.

Conclusion

MR-guided discography is accurate and safe. Multiplanar dynamic imaging facilitates the puncture of discs and provides high-quality MR discograms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson SR, Flanagan B (2000) Discography. Curr Rev Pain 4:345–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bogduk N, Modic MT (1996) Lumbar discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 21:402–404

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grasshoff H, Kayser R, Mahlfeld U, Mahlfeld K (2001) Diskography findings and results of percutaneous laser disk decompression (PLDD). Rofo 173:191–194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Weishaupt D, Zanetti M, Hodler J et al (2001) Painful lumbar disk derangement: relevance of endplate abnormalities at MR imaging. Radiology 218:420–427

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Derby R, Howard MW, Grant JM, Lettice JJ, Van Peteghem PK, Ryan DP (1999) The ability of pressure-controlled discography to predict surgical and nonsurgical outcomes. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:364–371

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guyer RD, Ohnmeiss DD (2003) Lumbar discography. Spine J 3:11S–27S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ohtori S, Kinoshita T, Yamashita M et al (2009) Results of surgery for discogenic low back pain: a randomized study using discography versus discoblock for diagnosis. Spine Phila Pa 1976 34:1345–1348

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Silverman SG, Hooton S, Tuncali K, Adams DF (2000) Patient and personnel exposure during CT fluoroscopy-guided interventional procedures. Radiology 216:180–184

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Falco FJ, Moran JG (2003) Lumbar discography using gadolinium in patients with iodine contrast allergy followed by postdiscography computed tomography scan. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:E1–E4

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huang TS, Zucherman JF, Hsu KY, Shapiro M, Lentz D, Gartland J (2002) Gadopentetate dimeglumine as an intradiscal contrast agent. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27:839–843

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kluner C, Kivelitz D, Rogalla P, Putzier M, Hamm B, Enzweiler C (2006) Percutaneous discography: comparison of low-dose CT, fluoroscopy and MRI in the diagnosis of lumbar disc disruption. Eur Spine J 15:620–626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sequeiros RB, Klemola R, Ojala R, Jyrkinen L, Vaara T, Tervonen O (2003) Percutaneous MR-guided discography in a low-field system using optical instrument tracking: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 17:214–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sequeiros RB, Niinimaki J, Ojala R et al (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging-guided diskography and diagnostic lumbar 0.23 T MRI: an assessment study. Acta Radiol 47:272–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Streitparth F, Walter T, Wonneberger U et al (2010) Image-guided spinal injection procedures in open high-field MRI with vertical field orientation: feasibility and technical features. Eur Radiol 20:395–403

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Streitparth F, Gebauer B, Melcher I et al (2009) MR-guided laser ablation of osteoid osteoma in an open high-field system (1.0 T). Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 32:320–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Streitparth F, Knobloch G, Balmert D et al (2010) Laser-induced thermotherapy (LITT)-evaluation of a miniaturised applicator and implementation in a 1.0-T high-field open MRI applying a porcine liver model. Eur Radiol. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1831-6

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ricke J, Thormann M, Ludewig M et al (2010) MR-guided liver tumor ablation employing open high-field 1.0 T MRI for image-guided brachytherapy. Eur Radiol 20:1985–1993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chopra SS, Rump J, Schmidt SC et al (2009) Imaging sequences for intraoperative MR-guided laparoscopic liver resection in 1.0-T high field open MRI. Eur Radiol 9:2191–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinkernelle JG, Streitparth F, Rump J, Teichgräber U (2010) Adaptation of a wireless PC mouse for modification of GUI during intervention in an open highfield MRI at 1.0 T. Rofo 182:348–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sachs BL, Vanharanta H, Spivey MA et al (1987) Dallas discogram description. A new classification of CT/discography in low-back disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12:287–294

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Collins CD, Stack JP, O’Connell DJ et al (1990) The role of discography in lumbar disc disease: a comparative study of magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Clin Radiol 42:252–257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Slipman CW, Rogers DP, Isaac Z et al (2002) MR lumbar discography with intradiscal gadolinium in patients with severe anaphylactoid reaction to iodinated contrast material. Pain Med 3:23–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kakitsubata Y, Theodorou DJ, Theodorou SJ et al (2003) Magnetic resonance discography in cadavers: tears of the annulus fibrosus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 407:228–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wonneberger U, Schnackenburg B, Streitparth F, Walter T, Rump J, Teichgraber UK (2010) Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible needles and interactive sequences for musculoskeletal interventions using an open high-field magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 33:346–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Walsh TR, Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Lehmann TR, Aprill C, Sayre H (1990) Lumbar discography in normal subjects. A controlled, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1081–1088

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Carragee EJ (2000) Is lumbar discography a determinate of discogenic low back pain: provocative discography reconsidered. Curr Rev Pain 4:301–308

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Heidi Kotalla, surgical nurse, and Andreas Thomas, MRI technician, for their collaboration and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Charité, Humboldt-University Medical School, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    Florian Streitparth, M. De Bucourt, B. Hamm & U. Teichgräber

  2. Center for Musculoskeletal Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    T. Hartwig, P. Strube & M. Putzier

  3. Philips Medical Systems, Hamburg, Germany

    B. Schnackenburg

  4. Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    S. Chopra

Authors
  1. Florian Streitparth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Hartwig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. B. Schnackenburg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. P. Strube
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. M. Putzier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. S. Chopra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. M. De Bucourt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. B. Hamm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. U. Teichgräber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florian Streitparth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Streitparth, F., Hartwig, T., Schnackenburg, B. et al. MR-guided discography using an open 1 Tesla MRI system. Eur Radiol 21, 1043–1049 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2011-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-2011-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation