Abstract
Objectives
This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the diagnostic outcomes and complication rates and to identify potential covariates that could influence these results for computed tomography (CT)–guided core needle biopsy (CNB) of mediastinal masses.
Methods
A computerized search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases was performed to identify original articles on the use of CT-guided CNB for mediastinal mass. The pooled proportions of the diagnostic yield and accuracy were assessed using random effects modeling. We assessed the pooled proportion of complication rates using random effects or fixed effects modeling. Multivariate meta-regression analyses were performed to evaluate the potential sources of heterogeneity.
Results
Eighteen eligible studies (1310 patients with 1345 CT-guided CNBs) were included. The pooled proportions of the diagnostic yield and accuracy of CT-guided CNB for mediastinal masses were 92% (18 studies, 1345 procedures) and 94% (15 studies, 803 procedures), respectively. In the subgroup analysis, the pooled proportions of the total complication rate and major complication rate were 13% and 2%, respectively. In the meta-regression analyses, the number of tissue samplings (odds ratio [OR], 3.3; p = 0.03), real-time fluoroscopy-guided (OR, 2.1; p = 0.02), and percentage of lymphoma (OR, 2.2; p < 0.001) for diagnostic yield, number of tissue samplings (OR = 2.0, p = 0.02) for diagnostic accuracy, and biopsy needle diameter (OR, 2.5; p = 0.002) for total complication rate were all sources of heterogeneity.
Conclusions
CT-guided CNB for mediastinal mass demonstrates high diagnostic outcomes and low complication rates. The use of 20-gauge biopsy needles and obtaining ≥ 3 samples may be recommended to improve diagnostic outcomes and decrease complication rates.
Key Points
• The pooled estimates of diagnostic yield and accuracy of computed tomography (CT)–guided core needle biopsy (CNB) for mediastinal masses are 92% and 94%, respectively.
• The pooled estimates of the total complication rate and major complication rate were 13% and 2%, respectively.
• The use of a 20-gauge needle and ≥ 3 tissue samplings are recommended for CT-guided mediastinal CNB to achieve high diagnostic outcomes and lower complication rates.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CI:
-
Confidence interval
- CNB:
-
Core needle biopsy
- FNA:
-
Fine needle aspiration
- OR:
-
Odd ratio
- PRISMA:
-
Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- QUADAS-2:
-
Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2
References
Kim H, Park CM, Lee SM, Goo JM (2015) C-arm cone-beam CT virtual navigation-guided percutaneous mediastinal mass biopsy: diagnostic accuracy and complications. Eur Radiol 25:3508–3517
De Margerie-Mellon C, De Bazelaire C, Amorim S et al (2015) Diagnostic yield and safety of computed tomography-guided mediastinal core needle biopsies. J Thorac Imaging 30:319–327
Date H (2009) Diagnostic strategies for mediastinal tumors and cysts. Thorac Surg Clin 19(29–35):vi
Bressler EL, Kirkham JA (1994) Mediastinal masses: alternative approaches to CT-guided needle biopsy. Radiology 191:391–396
Iguchi T, Hiraki T, Matsui Y et al (2018) CT fluoroscopy-guided core needle biopsy of anterior mediastinal masses. Diagn Interv Imaging 99:91–97
Rabbani M, Sarrami AH (2016) Computed tomography-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy for diagnosis of mediastinal mass lesions: experience with 110 cases in two university hospitals in Isfahan, Iran. Adv Biomed Res 5:152
Petranovic M, Gilman MD, Muniappan A et al (2015) Diagnostic yield of CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy for diagnosis of anterior mediastinal masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 205:774–779
Kulkarni S, Kulkarni A, Roy D, Thakur M (2008) Percutaneous computed tomography-guided core biopsy for the diagnosis of mediastinal masses. Ann Thorac Med 3:13–17
Priola AM, Priola SM, Cataldi A et al (2008) CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic biopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal masses: evaluation of 73 procedures. Radiol Med 113:3–15
Shaham D, Goitein O, Vazquez MF et al (2001) Biopsy of mediastinal tumors: needle biopsy versus mediastinoscopy: pro needle biopsy. J Bronchol 8:132–138
Neyaz Z, Lal H, Thakral A, Nath A, Rao R, Verma R (2016) Percutaneous computed tomography-guided aspiration and biopsy of intrathoracic lesions: results of 265 procedures. Lung India 33:620–625
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J et al (2009) The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 6:e1000100
McInnes MDF, Moher D, Thombs BD et al (2018) Preferred reporting items for a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies: the PRISMA-DTA statement. JAMA 319:388–396
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME et al (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536
Borenstein M, Hedges LV, Higgins JP, Rothstein HR (2010) A basic introduction to fixed-effect and random-effects models for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 1:97–111
DerSimonian R, Kacker R (2007) Random-effects model for meta-analysis of clinical trials: an update. Contemp Clin Trials 28:105–114
Higgins J, Green S (2011) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, London. Available via http://handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 10 Jan 2019
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, Minder C (1997) Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ 315:629–634
Duval S, Tweedie R (2000) Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics 56:455–463
Sacks D, McClenny TE, Cardella JF, Lewis CA (2003) Society of Interventional Radiology clinical practice guidelines. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:S199–S202
Gardner D, VanSonnenberg E, D’Agostino HB, Casola G, Taggart S, May S (1991) CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 14:17–23
Divisi D, Battaglia C, Crisci R et al (1998) Diagnostic and therapeutic approaches for masses in the posterior mediastinum. Acta Biomed Ateneo Parmense 69:123–128
Lin ZY, Li YG (2009) Artificial pneumothorax with position adjustment for computed tomography-guided percutaneous core biopsy of mediastinum lesions. Ann Thorac Surg 87:920–924
Malone LJ, Stanfill RM, Wang H, Fahey KM, Bertino RE (2013) Effect of intraparenchymal blood patch on rates of pneumothorax and pneumothorax requiring chest tube placement after percutaneous lung biopsy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 200:1238–1243
Scalzetti EM (2005) Protective pneumothorax for needle biopsy of mediastinum and pulmonary hilum. J Thorac Imaging 20:214–219
Azrumelashvili T, Mizandari M, Dundua T, Magalashvili D (2016) Ultrasound and CT guided thoracic biopsy approaches - effectiveness and complications. Georgian Med News:32–39
Ghanaati H, Firouznia K, Motevalli M, Mirdamadi L, Jalali AH (2008) Fluoroscopic versus conventional computed tomography-guided biopsy. Iran J Radiol 5:39–42
Gorgulu FF, Oksuzler FY, Arslan SA, Arslan M, Ozsoy IE, Gorgulu O (2017) Computed tomography-guided transthoracic biopsy: factors influencing diagnostic and complication rates. J Int Med Res 45:808–815
Khan AR, Khan MY, Javaid A, Hussain I (2010) Percutaneous image guided cutting needle biopsy of mediastinal masses: diagnostic yield and complications. J Postgrad Med Inst 24:58–61
VanSonnenberg E, Casola G, Ho M et al (1988) Difficult thoracic lesions: CT-guided biopsy experience in 150 cases. Radiology 167:457–461
Watanabe M, Takagi K, Aoki T et al (1998) A comparison of biopsy through a parasternal anterior mediastinotomy under local anesthesia and percutaneous needle biopsy for malignant anterior mediastinal tumors. Surg Today 28:1022–1026
Westcott JL (1981) Percutaneous needle aspiration of hilar and mediastinal masses. Radiology 141:323–329
Yadav RK, Sen R, Agarwal S, Aggarwal S (2010) CT-guided FNAC of intrathoracic mass lesions--a study among 35 patients. J Indian Med Assoc 108:571–574
Zamboni M, Lannes DC, Cordeiro PDB et al (2009) Transthoracic biopsy with core cutting needle (Trucut) for the diagnosis of mediastinal tumors. Rev Port Pneumol 15:589–595
Azrumelashvili T, Mizandari M, Magalashvili D, Dundua T (2015) Imaging guided mediastinal percutaneal core biopsy--technique and complications. Georgian Med News 24–34
Branden E, Wallgren S, Hogberg H, Koyi H (2014) Computer tomography-guided core biopsies in a county hospital in Sweden: complication rate and diagnostic yield. Ann Thorac Med 9:149–153
de Farias AP, Deheinzelin D, Younes RN, Chojniak R (2003) Computed tomography-guided biopsy of mediastinal lesions: fine versus cutting needles. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 58:69–74
Floridi C, Reginelli A, Capasso R et al (2017) Percutaneous needle biopsy of mediastinal masses under C-arm conebeam CT guidance: diagnostic performance and safety. Med Oncol:34
Greif J, Staroselsky AN, Gernjac M et al (1999) Percutaneous core needle biopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal tumors. Lung Cancer 25:169–173
Hagberg H, Ahlström HK, Magnusson A, Sundström C, Åström GK (2000) Value of transsternal core biopsy in patients with a newly diagnosed mediastinal mass. Acta Oncol 39:195–198
Jiao D, Huang K, Wu G, Wang Y, Han X (2016) Flat detector cone-beam CT-guided percutaneous needle biopsy of mediastinal lesions: preliminary experience. Radiol Med 121:769–779
Sklair-Levy M, Polliack A, Shaham D et al (2000) CT-guided core-needle biopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphoma. Eur Radiol 10:714–718
Yanagawa M, Tomiyama N, Honda O et al (2010) CT-guided percutaneous cutting needle biopsy of thymic epithelial tumors. Comparison to the accuracy of computed tomographic diagnosis according to the World Health Organization classification. Acad Radiol 17:772–778
Yokoyama K, Ikeda O, Kawanaka K et al (2014) Comparison of CT-guided percutaneous biopsy with and without registration of prior PET/CT images to diagnose mediastinal tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 37:1306–1311
Yousef HY, Dawood HA, Mohey N (2017) Is there any role for diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging before transthoracic CT guided biopsy? Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med 48:927–930
Lim C, Lee KY, Kim YK, Ko JM, Han DH (2013) CT-guided core biopsy of malignant lung lesions: how many needle passes are needed? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 57:652–656
Hiraki T, Mimura H, Gobara H et al (2009) CT fluoroscopy-guided biopsy of 1,000 pulmonary lesions performed with 20-gauge coaxial cutting needles: diagnostic yield and risk factors for diagnostic failure. Chest 136:1612–1617
Beck KS, Kim TJ, Lee KY, Kim YK, Kang JH, Han DH (2019) CT-guided coaxial biopsy of malignant lung lesions: are cores from 20-gauge needle adequate for histologic diagnosis and molecular analysis? J Thorac Dis 11:753–765
Eichenauer DA, Engert A, Dreyling M ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2011) Hodgkin’s lymphoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 22(Suppl 6):vi55–vi58
Tilly H, Dreyling M, ESMO Guidelines Working Group (2010) Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 5):v172–v174
Frederiksen JK, Sharma M, Casulo C, Burack WR (2015) Systematic review of the effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration and/or core needle biopsy for subclassifying lymphoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med 139:245–251
Priola SM, Priola AM, Cataldi A, Fava C (2006) Nodular sclerosing Hodgkin disease presenting as a sternal mass. Br J Haematol 135:594
Kim GR, Hur J, Lee SM et al (2011) CT fluoroscopy-guided lung biopsy versus conventional CT-guided lung biopsy: a prospective controlled study to assess radiation doses and diagnostic performance. Eur Radiol 21:232–239
Prosch H, Stadler A, Schilling M et al (2012) CT fluoroscopy-guided vs. multislice CT biopsy mode-guided lung biopsies: accuracy, complications and radiation dose. Eur J Radiol 81:1029–1033
Heerink WJ, de Bock GH, de Jonge GJ, Groen HJ, Vliegenthart R, Oudkerk M (2017) Complication rates of CT-guided transthoracic lung biopsy: meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 27:138–148
Geraghty PR, Kee ST, McFarlane G, Razavi MK, Sze DY, Dake MD (2003) CT-guided transthoracic needle aspiration biopsy of pulmonary nodules: needle size and pneumothorax rate. Radiology 229:475–481
Kuban JD, Tam AL, Huang SY et al (2015) The effect of needle gauge on the risk of pneumothorax and chest tube placement after percutaneous computed tomographic (CT)-guided lung biopsy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 38:1595–1602
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Seong Jong Yun, MD, PhD.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
One of the authors (Seong Jong Yun, MD) has significant statistical expertise.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was not required for this study because the nature of our study was a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was not required because the nature of our study was a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Methodology
• Meta-analysis performed at one institution
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOC 133 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, H.N., Yun, S.J., Kim, J.I. et al. Diagnostic outcome and safety of CT-guided core needle biopsy for mediastinal masses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol 30, 588–599 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06377-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06377-4