Abstract
Objectives
Rectal cancer patients with a clinical complete response after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be followed with a ‘watch-and-wait’ (W&W) approach as an alternative to surgery. MRI plays an important role in the follow-up of these patients, but basic knowledge on what to expect from the morphology of the irradiated tumour bed during follow-up is lacking, which can hamper image interpretation. The objective was to establish the spectrum of non-suspicious findings during long-term (> 2 years) follow-up in patients with a sustained clinical complete response undergoing W&W.
Methods
A total of 1509 T2W MRIs of 164 sustained complete responders undergoing W&W were retrospectively evaluated. Morphology of the tumour bed was evaluated (2 independent readers) on the restaging MRI and on the various follow-up MRIs and classified as (a) no fibrosis, (b) minimal fibrosis, (c) full thickness fibrosis, or (d) irregular fibrosis. Any changes occurring during follow-up were documented.
Results
A total of 104 patients (63%) showed minimal fibrosis, 38 (23%) full thickness fibrosis, 8 (5%) irregular fibrosis, and 14 (9%) no fibrosis. In 93% of patients, the morphology remained completely stable during follow-up; in 7%, a minor increase/decrease in fibrosis was observed. Interobserver agreement was excellent (κ 0.90).
Conclusions
Typically, the morphology as established at restaging remains completely unchanged. The majority of patients show fibrosis with the predominant pattern being a minimal fibrosis confined to the rectal wall. Complete absence of fibrosis occurs in only 1/10 cases. Once validated in independent cohorts, these findings may serve as a reference for radiologists involved in the clinical follow-up of W&W patients.
Key Points
• In rectal cancer patients with a sustained complete response after chemoradiation, the rectal wall morphology as established on restaging MRI typically remains unchanged during long-term MRI follow-up.
• The vast majority of complete responders show fibrosis with the predominant pattern being a minimal fibrotic remnant that remains confined to the rectal wall; complete absence of fibrosis occurs in only 10% of the cases.
• Once validated in independent cohorts, the findings of this study may serve as a reference for radiologists involved in the clinical follow-up of rectal cancer patients undergoing watch-and-wait.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- CRT:
-
Chemoradiotherapy
- DWI:
-
Diffusion-weighted imaging
- ESGAR:
-
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology
- FSE:
-
Fast spin echo
- FU:
-
Follow-up
- T2W:
-
T2-weighted
- W&W:
-
Watch-and-wait
References
Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Nadalin W et al (2014) Operative versus nonoperative treatment for stage 0 distal rectal cancer following chemoradiation therapy: long-term results. Ann Surg 240:711–717 discussion 7-8
Martens MH, Maas M, Heijnen LA et al (2016) Long-term outcome of an organ preservation program after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 108
Smith JD, Ruby JA, Goodman KA et al (2012) Nonoperative management of rectal cancer with complete clinical response after neoadjuvant therapy. Ann Surg 256:965–972
Appelt AL, Ploen J, Harling H et al (2015) High-dose chemoradiotherapy and watchful waiting for distal rectal cancer: a prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol 16:919–927
Hupkens BJP, Martens MH, Stoot JH et al (2017) Quality of life in rectal cancer patients after chemoradiation: Watch-and-Wait Policy versus standard resection - a matched-controlled study. Dis Colon Rectum 60:1032–1040
van der Valk MJM, Hilling DE, Bastiaannet E et al (2018) Long-term outcomes of clinical complete responders after neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer in the International Watch & Wait Database (IWWD): an international multicentre registry study. Lancet 391:2537–2545
Lambregts DM, Lahaye MJ, Heijnen LA et al (2016) MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI to diagnose a local tumour regrowth during long-term follow-up of rectal cancer patients treated with organ preservation after chemoradiotherapy. Eur Radiol 26:2118–2125
Lambregts DM, Maas M, Bakers FC et al (2011) Long-term follow-up features on rectal MRI during a wait-and-see approach after a clinical complete response in patients with rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1521–1158
Maas M, Beets-Tan RG, Lambregts DM et al (2011) Wait-and-see policy for clinical complete responders after chemoradiation for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2011(29):4633–4640
Lambregts D, Delli Pizzi A, Lahaye M et al (2018) A pattern-based approach combining tumor morphology on MRI with distinct signal patterns on diffusion-weighted imaging to assess response of rectal tumors after chemoradiotherapy. Dis Colon Rectum 61:328–337
Kim SH, Lee JM, Hong SH et al (2009) Locally advanced rectal cancer: added value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the evaluation of tumor response to neoadjuvant chemo- and radiation therapy. Radiology 253:116–125
Lambregts DM, Vandecaveye V, Barbaro B et al (2011) Diffusion-weighted MRI for selection of complete responders after chemoradiation for locally advanced rectal cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol 18:2224–2231
Song I, Kim SH, Lee SJ, Choi JY, Kim MJ, Rhim H (2012) Value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of viable tumor after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: comparison with T2-weighted and PET/CT imaging. Br J Radiol 85:577–586
Foti PV, Privitera G, Piana S et al (2016) Locally advanced rectal cancer: qualitative and quantitative evaluation of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the response assessment after neoadjuvant chemo-radiotherapy. Eur J Radiol Open 3:145–152
Beets-Tan RGH, Lambregts DMJ, Maas M et al (2018) Magnetic resonance imaging for clinical management of rectal cancer: updated recommendations from the 2016 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) consensus meeting. Eur Radiol 28:1465–1475
Heijnen LA, Maas M, Beets-Tan RG et al (2016) Nodal staging in rectal cancer: why is restaging after chemoradiation more accurate than primary nodal staging? Int J Colorectal Dis 31:1157–1162
Funding
The authors state that this work has not received any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Guarantor
The scientific guarantor of this publication is Doenja Lambregts.
Conflict of interest
The authors of this manuscript declare no relationships with any companies, whose products or services may be related to the subject matter of the article.
Statistics and biometry
No complex statistical methods were necessary for this paper.
Informed consent
Written informed consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board.
Ethical approval
Institutional Review Board approval was obtained.
Study subjects or cohorts overlap
The study patients were all selected from consecutive cohorts of previously reported and ongoing clinical trials focussing on the oncological and functional outcome of a watch-and-wait policy (Maas et al JCO 2011, Martens et al J Natl Cancer Inst 2016, van der Valk et al Lancet 2018, and an ongoing clinical study registered at clinical trials.gov under NCT03426397). In addition, 47 of the patients included in the current study were included in a previous study on the use of MRI+DWI to detect local tumour regrowths during follow-up (Lambregts et al Eur Rad 2016). This previous study concerned a diagnostic accuracy study focussing on detecting recurrent tumours with a specific focus on DWI, while the current report is a descriptive study focussing on T2W morphology which included only non-recurrent patients.
Methodology
• Retrospective
• Diagnostic or prognostic study
• Multicentre study
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lambregts, D.M.J., Maas, M., Boellaard, T.N. et al. Long-term imaging characteristics of clinical complete responders during watch-and-wait for rectal cancer—an evaluation of over 1500 MRIs. Eur Radiol 30, 272–280 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06396-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-019-06396-1