Abstract
Purpose
This study aimed at evaluating the potential of CT-calculometry (CT-CM) as a novel method to determine mineralisation, composition, homogeneity and volume of urinary calculi based on preoperative non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (NCCT) scans.
Materials and methods
CT-CM was performed in preoperative NCCTs of 25 patients treated for upper tract urinary calculi by ureterorenoscopy or percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Absolute mineralisation values were achieved by use of quantitative CT-osteoabsorptiometry and compared to Fourier infrared spectroscopy as a reference for stone composition. Homogeneity was assessed by advanced software-based NCCT post-processing and visualised by using a maximum intensity projection algorithm. Volumetric measurement was performed by software-based three-dimensional reconstruction.
Results
CT-CM was feasible in all of the 25 NCCTs. Absolute mineralisation values calculated by quantitative CT-OAM might be used to identify the most frequent stone types. High levels of inhomogeneity could be detected even in pure component stones. Volumetric measurement could be performed with minimal effort.
Conclusions
CT-CM is based on advanced NCCT post-processing software and represents a novel and promising approach to determine mineralisation, composition, homogeneity and volume of urinary calculi based on preoperative NCCT. CT-CM could provide valuable information to predict outcome of different stone treatment methods.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR (2015) Guideline of guidelines: kidney stones. BJU Int 116(2):184–189. doi:10.1111/bju.13080
Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159(3):735–740
Bandi G, Meiners RJ, Pickhardt PJ, Nakada SY (2009) Stone measurement by volumetric three-dimensional computed tomography for predicting the outcome after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. BJU Int 103(4):524–528. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08069.x
Stewart G, Johnson L, Ganesh H, Davenport D, Smelser W, Crispen P, Venkatesh R (2015) Stone size limits the use of Hounsfield units for prediction of calcium oxalate stone composition. Urology 85(2):292–295. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.006
Renner C, Rassweiler J (1999) Treatment of renal stones by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. Nephron 81(Suppl 1):71–81
Ouzaid I, Al-qahtani S, Dominique S, Hupertan V, Fernandez P, Hermieu JF, Delmas V, Ravery V (2012) A 970 Hounsfield units (HU) threshold of kidney stone density on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) improves patients’ selection for extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL): evidence from a prospective study. BJU Int 110(11 Pt B):E438–E442. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10964.x
Nakasato T, Morita J, Ogawa Y (2015) Evaluation of Hounsfield units as a predictive factor for the outcome of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and stone composition. Urolithiasis 43(1):69–75. doi:10.1007/s00240-014-0712-x
Mullhaupt G, Engeler DS, Schmid HP, Abt D (2015) How do stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance in computed tomography influence the performance of shock wave lithotripsy in ureteral stone disease? BMC Urol 15:72. doi:10.1186/s12894-015-0069-7
Marchini GS, Remer EM, Gebreselassie S, Liu X, Pynadath C, Snyder G, Monga M (2013) Stone characteristics on noncontrast computed tomography: establishing definitive patterns to discriminate calcium and uric acid compositions. Urology 82(3):539–546. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2013.03.092
Yamashita S, Kohjimoto Y, Iguchi T, Nishizawa S, Iba A, Kikkawa K, Hara I (2017) Variation coefficient of stone density: a novel predictor of the outcome of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol. doi:10.1089/end.2016.0719
Zhang GM, Sun H, Xue HD, Xiao H, Zhang XB, Jin ZY (2016) Prospective prediction of the major component of urinary stone composition with dual-source dual-energy CT in vivo. Clin Radiol 71(11):1178–1183. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2016.07.012
Hidas G, Eliahou R, Duvdevani M, Coulon P, Lemaitre L, Gofrit ON, Pode D, Sosna J (2010) Determination of renal stone composition with dual-energy CT: in vivo analysis and comparison with X-ray diffraction. Radiology 257(2):394–401. doi:10.1148/radiol.10100249
Sorokin I, Cardona-Grau DK, Rehfuss A, Birney A, Stavrakis C, Leinwand G, Herr A, Feustel PJ, White MD (2016) Stone volume is best predictor of operative time required in retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal calculi: implications for surgical planning and quality improvement. Urolithiasis 44(6):545–550. doi:10.1007/s00240-016-0875-8
Patel SR, Wells S, Ruma J, King S, Lubner MG, Nakada SY, Pickhardt PJ (2012) Automated volumetric assessment by noncontrast computed tomography in the surveillance of nephrolithiasis. Urology 80(1):27–31. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2012.03.009
Ghani KR, Wolf JS Jr (2015) What is the stone-free rate following flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones? Nat Rev Urol 12(5):281–288. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2015.74
Zumstein V, Kraljevic M, Wirz D, Hugli R, Muller-Gerbl M (2012) Correlation between mineralization and mechanical strength of the subchondral bone plate of the humeral head. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 21(7):887–893. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.018
Kraljevic M, Zumstein V, Wirz D, Hugli R, Muller-Gerbl M (2011) Mineralisation and mechanical strength of the glenoid cavity subchondral bone plate. Int Orthop 35(12):1813–1819. doi:10.1007/s00264-011-1308-5
Meirer R, Muller-Gerbl M, Huemer GM, Schirmer M, Herold M, Kersting S, Freund MC, Rainer C, Gardetto A, Wanner S, Piza-Katzer H (2004) Quantitative assessment of periarticular osteopenia in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a preliminary report. Scand J Rheumatol 33(5):307–311. doi:10.1080/03009740410005890
Muller-Gerbl M (1998) The subchondral bone plate. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 141(III–XI):1–134
Zhang M, Zhang X, Zhang B, Wang D (2016) Composition, microstructure and element study of urinary calculi. Microsc Res Tech 79(11):1038–1044. doi:10.1002/jemt.22739
Finch W, Johnston R, Shaida N, Winterbottom A, Wiseman O (2014) Measuring stone volume—three-dimensional software reconstruction or an ellipsoid algebra formula? BJU Int 113(4):610–614. doi:10.1111/bju.12456
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
VZ: Project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. PB: Project development, manuscript writing. LH: Data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing. HPS: Project development, manuscript editing. DA: Project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing. MMG: Project development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
V. Zumstein, P. Betschart, L. Hechelhammer, H. P. Schmid, D. Abt and M. Müller-Gerbl have nothing to disclose according to the ICMJE conflict of interest form.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zumstein, V., Betschart, P., Hechelhammer, L. et al. CT-calculometry (CT-CM): advanced NCCT post-processing to investigate urinary calculi. World J Urol 36, 117–123 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2092-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2092-7