Abstract
For foraging pollinators one aspect of floral quality is the volume of nectar available. Thus, nectar-feeding animals should be able to estimate volumes of received nectar. In this study, we determined the psychometric function for nectar volume discrimination of a Neotropical flower-visiting bat Glossophaga soricina. For this, we examined the ability of bats to discriminate between two nectar volumes in a two-alternative forced-choice paradigm. We used a Bayesian inference approach to determine psychometric functions. From the derived psychometric function we assessed the discrimination threshold at a value of 0.69. G. soricina could clearly distinguish between two volumes, when the difference between the two nectar volumes divided by their average exceeded this value. This indicates that bats possess a sense for the perception and discrimination of volumes of nectar that is better developed than in honeybees.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker HG, Baker I, Hodges SA (1998) Sugar composition of nectars and fruits consumed by birds and bats in the tropics and subtropics. Biotropica 30:559–586
Cartar RV (2004) Resource tracking by bumble bees: Responses to plant-level differences in quality. Ecology 85:2764–2771
Dukas R (2004) Evolutionary biology of animal cognition. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:347–374
Garrison JSE, Gass CL (1999) Response of a traplining hummingbird to changes in nectar availability. Behav Ecol 10:714–725
Kuss M, Jakel F, Wichmann FA (2005) Bayesian inference for psychometric functions. J Vision 5:478–492
Robertson AW, Mountjoy C, Faulkner BE, Roberts MV, Macnair MR (1999) Bumble bee selection of Mimulus guttatus flowers: the effects of pollen quality and reward depletion. Ecology 80:2594–2606
Shafir S, Menda G, Smith BH (2005) Caste-specific differences in risk sensitivity in honeybees, Apis mellifera. Anim Behav 69:859–868
Shettleworth SJ (1998) Cognition, evolution, and behavior. Oxford University Press, New York
Stout JC, Goulson D (2002) The influence of nectar secretion rates on the responses of bumblebees (Bombus spp.) to previously visited flowers. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 52:239–246
Thomson JD (1986) Pollen transport and deposition by bumble bees in Erythronium—influences of floral nectar and bee grooming. J Ecol 74:329–341
Treutwein B, Strasburger H (1999) Fitting the psychometric function. Percept Psychophys 61:87–106
Winter Y, Stich KP (2005) Foraging in a complex naturalistic environment: capacity of spatial working memory in flower bats. J Exp Biol 208:539–548
Winter Y, von Helversen O (2001) Bats as pollinators: foraging energetics and floral adaptations. In: Chittka L, Thomson J (eds) Cognitive ecology of pollination. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 148–170
Acknowledgments
This study was supported by a grant from the Volkswagen Foundation to YW. We thank two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments. Experiments complied with national laws on animal care.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Toelch, U., Winter, Y. Psychometric function for nectar volume perception of a flower-visiting bat. J Comp Physiol A 193, 265–269 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0189-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-006-0189-3