Abstract
Using visualization methods to describe collaborative relationships can form a more intuitive and conducive graphical representation of these relationships, helping us better understand and analyze complex dynamic collaborative relationships. To explore a suitable visualization form for collaborative relationship analysis, we propose a task classification method to evaluate the two visual methods (node-link and adjacency matrix) which represent the static features and the three methods (animation, small multiples, and timeline) which represent the time characteristics of dynamic graphs. We present an evaluation system and design a task-based user evaluation experiment with the Dutch railway project data. By collecting and analyzing task completion time and error rates, we summarize our findings from the evaluation experiment and list three key recommendations to provide preliminary clues to visual designers: (1) Node-link has a better performance on small-scale project management. (2) Timeline has more advantages in the expression of project time management. (3) Animation will be a good choice when you need to check the status of tasks in the project management for a period of time. These findings can help the designers discover faster and more accurate ways to visualize the characteristics and changes of collaborative relationships, thus promoting the smooth progress of collaborative work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn, J., Plaisant, C., Shneiderman, B.: A task taxonomy for network evolution analysis. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 20(3), 1 (2013)
Arendt, D.L., Blaha, L.M.: SVEN: informative visual representation of complex dynamic structure. Comput. Sci. (2014). arXiv:1412.6706
Bach, B., Henry-Riche, N., Dwyer, T., Madhyastha, T., Fekete, J., Grabowski, T.: Small multipiles: piling time to explore temporal patterns in dynamic networks. Comput. Graph. Forum 34(3), 31–40 (2015)
Bach, B., Pietriga, E., Fekete, J.D.: Graphdiaries: animated transitions and temporal navigation for dynamic networks. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 20(5), 740 (2014)
Bach, B., Pietriga, E., Fekete, J.D.: Visualizing dynamic networks with matrix cubes, pp. 877–886 (2014)
Beck, F., Burch, M., Diehl, S., Weiskopf, D.: A taxonomy and survey of dynamic graph visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum 36(1), 133–159 (2017)
Behrisch, M., Bach, B., Henry Riche, N., Schreck, T., Fekete, J.D.: Matrix reordering methods for table and network visualization. Comput. Graph. Forum 35, 693–716 (2016)
Borgo, R., Micallef, L., Bach, B., McGee, F., Lee, B.: Information visualization evaluation using crowdsourcing. Comput. Graph. Forum 37, 573–595 (2018)
Caban, J.J., Rheingans, P., Yoo, T.: An evaluation of visualization techniques to illustrate statistical deformation models. Comput. Graph. Forum 30(3), 821–830 (2011)
Carley, K.M.: Computational organizational science and organizational engineering. Simul. Modell. Pract. Theory 10(5), 253–269 (2002)
Chang, C., Bach, B., Dwyer, T., Marriott, K.: Evaluating perceptually complementary views for network exploration tasks. In: CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1397–1407 (2017)
Collins, C., Penn, G., Carpendale, S.: Bubble sets: revealing set relations with isocontours over existing visualizations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 6, 1009–1016 (2009)
Farrugia, M., Quigley, A.: Effective Temporal Graph Layout: A Comparative Study of Animation Versus Static Display Methods. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2011)
Federico, P., Miksch, S.: Evaluation of Two Interaction Tech-niques for Visualization of Dynamic Graphs. Springer, New York (2016)
Fung, D.C., Li, S.S., Goel, A., Hong, S.H., Wilkins, M.R.: Visualization of the interactome: What are we looking at? Proteomics 12(10), 1669–1686 (2012)
Ghoniem, M., Fekete, J.D., Castagliola, P.: A comparison of the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations. In: IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 17–24 (2005)
Isenberg, T., Isenberg, P., Chen, J., Sedlmair, M., Möller, T.: A systematic review on the practice of evaluating visualization. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(12), 2818–2827 (2013)
Jianu, R., Rusu, A., Hu, Y., Taggart, D.: How to display group information on node-link diagrams: an evaluation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 20(11), 1530–1541 (2014)
Kerracher, N., Kennedy, J.: Constructing and Evaluating Visualisation Task Classifications: Process and Considerations. Wiley, Hoboken (2017)
Kerracher, N., Kennedy, J., Chalmers, K.: A task taxonomy for temporal graph visualisation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 21(10), 1160–1172 (2015)
Liu, S., Wu, Y., Wei, E., Liu, M., Liu, Y.: Storyflow: tracking the evolution of stories. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(12), 2436–2445 (2013)
Lu, Q., Zhu, X.Y., Liu, L., Cao, S.B.: An effective demonstration for group collaboration based on storyline visualization technology. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp. 47–52 (2014)
Ma, K.L.: Stargate: a unified, interactive visualization of software projects. In: Visualization Symposium (2008)
Marriott, K., Purchase, H., Wybrow, M., Goncu, C.: Memorability of visual features in network diagrams. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18(12), 2477–85 (2012)
Ogawa, M., Ma, K.L.: Software evolution storylines. In: ACM 2010 Symposium on Software Visualization, Salt Lake City, pp. 35–42 (2010)
Okoe, M., Jianu, R.: Graphunit: evaluating interactive graph visualizations using crowdsourcing. In: Eurographics Conference on Visualization, pp. 451–460 (2015)
Qiang, L., Chai, B., Zhang, H.: Storytelling by the storycake visualization. Vis. Comput. 33(46), 1–12 (2017)
Ribeiro, F.C., Souza, J.M.D., Paula, M.M.V.D.: Use of information visualization techniques in a collaborative context. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, pp. 79–84 (2015)
Shi, Y., Bryan, C., Bhamidipati, S., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Y., Ma, K.L.: Meetingvis: visual narratives to assist in recalling meeting context and content. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24(6), 1918–1929 (2018)
Sébastien, R., Mcguffin, M.J.: Diffani: visualizing dynamic graphs with a hybrid of difference maps and animation. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 19(12), 2556 (2013)
Tanahashi, Y., Ma, K.L.: Design considerations for optimizing storyline visualizations. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 18(12), 2679 (2012)
Wu, Y., Pitipornvivat, N., Zhao, J., Yang, S., Huang, G., Qu, H.: Egoslider: visual analysis of egocentric network evolution. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 22(1), 260–269 (2015)
Yoghourdjian, V., Archambault, D., Diehl, S., Dwyer, T., Klein, K., Purchase, H.C., Wu, H.Y.: Exploring the limits of complexity: a survey of empirical studies on graph visualisation. Vis. Inf. 2(4), 264–282 (2019)
Zhao, Y., Luo, F., Chen, M., Wang, Y., Xia, J., Zhou, F., Wang, Y., Chen, Y., Chen, W.: Evaluating multi-fuzzy clusters. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 25(1), 12–21 (2018)
Zhen, L., Wu, X., Zheng, Q.: A survey of dynamic network visualization and visual analysis. J. Comput. Aided Design Comput. Graph. 28(5), 693–701 (2016)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61972130 and 61906061, partly supported by the Key Research and Development Plan of Anhui Province under Grant No. 1704d0802177, partly supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province of China under Grant No. 1708085MF158, and also partly supported by the Key Project of Transformation and Industrialization of Scientific and Technological Achievements of Intelligent Manufacturing Technology Research Institute of Hefei University of Technology under Grant No. IMICZ2017010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, Q., Huang, J., Zhang, Q. et al. Evaluation on visualization methods of dynamic collaborative relationships for project management. Vis Comput 37, 161–174 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-019-01789-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00371-019-01789-1