Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Anterior fronto-orbital remodeling for trigonocephay

  • Special Annual Issue
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Trigonocephaly secondary to the premature fusion of the metopic synostosis is associated to a risk of cerebral compression and several craniofacial morphological alterations. Numerous surgical techniques have been proposed. They all carry a risk of secondary temporal hollowing

Purpose

The aim of this paper is to describe the surgical technique used for trigonocephaly at the craniofacial unit of Hopital Necker Enfants Malades (French National Referral Center for Faciocraniosynostosis) focusing on its advantages and limitations. Resorbable osteosynthesis should be part of the current techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D (2006) The treatment of craniosynostosis: indications and techniques. Neurochirurgie 52(2–3 Pt 2):264–291

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bottero L, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D, Renier D (1998) Functional outcome after surgery for trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(4):952–958

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Di Rocco C, Velardi F, Ferrario A, Marchese E (1996) Metopic synostosis: in favour of a "simplified" surgical treatment. Childs Nerv Syst 12(11):654–663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Di Rocco F, Arnaud E, Renier D (2009) Evolution in the frequency of nonsyndromic craniosynostosis. J Neurosurg Pediatr 4(1):21–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Rocco F, Arnaud E, Meyer P, Sainte-Rose C, Renier D (2009) Focus session on the changing "epidemiology" of craniosynostosis (comparing two quinquennia: 1985–1989 and 2003–2007) and its impact on the daily clinical practice: a review from Necker Enfants Malades. Childs Nerv Syst 25(7):807–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hayward R, Jones B, Evans R (1999) Functional outcome after surgery for trigonocephaly. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:582–583

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hilling DE, Mathijssen IM, Vaandrager JM (2006) Aesthetic results of fronto-orbital correction in trigonocephaly. J Craniofac Surg 17:1167–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hinojosa J, Esparza J, Muñoz MJ, Salván R, Romance A, Alén JF, Muñoz A (2002) Surgical treatment of trigonocephalies and associated hypoteleorbitism. Neurocirugia (Astur) 13:437–445

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Marchac D (1978) Radical forehead remodeling for craniostenosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 61:823–835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Marchac D, Renier D (1982) Chirurgie craniofaciale des craniosténoses. Mesdi, Paris, pp 1–173

    Google Scholar 

  11. Marchac D, Renier D (1982) Craniofacial surgery for craniosynostosis. Little Brown, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marchac D, Renier D, Broumand S (1994) Timing of treatment for craniosynostosis and facio-craniosynostosis: a 20-year experience. Br J Plast Surg 47:211–222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Renier D, Arnaud E, Marchac D (2006) Craniosynostosis: functional and morphologic postoperative results. Neurochirurgie 52(2–3 Pt 2):302–310

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Renier D, Lajeunie E, Arnaud E, Marchac D (2000) Management of craniosynostoses. Childs Nerv Syst 16(10–11):645–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Valentin M, Ducarme G, Yver C, Vuillard E, Belarbi N, Renier D, Luton D (2008) Trigonocephaly and valproate: a case report and review of literature. Prenat Diagn 28(3):259–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Meulen JJ, Nazir PR, Mathijssen IM, van Adrichem LN, Ongkosuwito E, Stolk-Liefferink SA, Vaandrager MJ (2008) Bitemporal depressions after cranioplasty for trigonocephaly: a long-term evaluation of (supra) orbital growth in 92 patients. J Craniofac Surg 19(1):72–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. van der Meulen JJ, Willemsen J, van der Vlugt J, Nazir PR, Hilling D, Mathijssen IM, Ongkosuwito E, van Adrichem LN, Vaandrager MJ, Hovius SE, Unit DC (2009) On the origin of bitemporal hollowing. J Craniofac Surg 20(3):752–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Meulen J, van der Hulst R, van Adrichem L, Arnaud E, Chin-Shong D, Duncan C, Habets E, Hinojosa J, Mathijssen I, May P, Morritt D, Nishikawa H, Noons P, Richardson D, Wall S, van der Vlugt J, Renier D (2009) The increase of metopic synostosis: a pan-European observation. J Craniofac Surg 20(2):283–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Di Rocco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Di Rocco, F., Arnaud, E., Marchac, D. et al. Anterior fronto-orbital remodeling for trigonocephay. Childs Nerv Syst 28, 1369–1373 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1841-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-012-1841-6

Keywords

Navigation