Skip to main content
Log in

Does circumcision alter the periurethral bacterial flora?

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Pediatric Surgery International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A prospective study of 25 boys who underwent circumcision for medical reason was performed. Specimens of periurethral bacterial flora were taken before operation as well as 3 weeks after surgery, so that each boy acted as his own control. Before circumcision, 13 (52%) harboured uropathogenic organisms (Escherichia coli and other coliforms, Enterococcus spp, Proteus spp, Pseudomonas spp, and Klebsiella spp); after circumcision, none of the boys had uropathogens, the only organisms cultured from the periurethral region being skin commensals. We postulate that circumcision converts a ‘cul-de-sac' that is a reservoir of organisms capable of causing ascending urinary tract infection into a surface colonised by natural skin organisms. This study provides circumstantial evidence supporting the idea that circumcision in well-selected patients may confer protection from urine infection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted: 15 March 1997

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wijesinha, S., Atkins, B., Dudley, N. et al. Does circumcision alter the periurethral bacterial flora?. Pediatr Surg Int 13, 146–148 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/s003830050270

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s003830050270

Navigation