Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The surgical management of fistula-in-ano in a specialist colorectal unit

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Fistula-in-ano can be associated with a number of conditions, including Crohn’s disease. The majority, however, are classified as idiopathic or cryptoglandular. The aim of this study was to review the outcome of surgical management of fistula-in-ano in a specialist colorectal unit.

Materials and methods

One hundred and four consecutive patients underwent surgery for anal fistulae between 1st January 2000 and December 2004. Data was analysed in two main groups, according to the aetiology, cryptoglandular (n = 86) and Crohn’s disease (n = 18). Follow-up data was available on 91 patients.

Results

In the cryptoglandular group, 62 patients had an inter-sphincteric tract, of which 48 underwent a single-stage fistulotomy. Of those patients with a trans-sphincteric tract, six patients underwent a single-stage fistulotomy, 13 had a seton and staged fistulotomy. Follow-up data revealed that two fistulae recurred. The median number of procedures in this group was 1 (range 1–3). There was a significant difference in the inpatient stay depending of Park’s classification (p = 0.001). In the Crohn’s group, three patients with an inter-sphincteric tract underwent a single-stage fistulotomy, two patients with a trans-sphincteric tract had single-stage fistulotomy, and five required a loose seton and staged fistulotomy. Eight patients had multiple fistulae which required long-term setons. Four patients from this group eventually required proctectomy. In the Crohn’s group, there was a significantly increased complexity of surgery and higher recurrence. This was reflected in an increased inpatient length of stay and a greater reliance on imaging (p = 0.001). The median number of procedures in this group was 3 (range 1–5).

Discussion

The majority of cryptoglandular fistula-in-ano were treated by primary fistulotomy or staged fistulotomy with a loose seton. This was associated with a low recurrence rate and low rates of faecal incontinence. There was a low reliance on imaging techniques in this group. However, we would urge caution when dealing with fistula-in-ano related to Crohn’s disease. In this group of patients, the fistulae tended to be more complex and require additional imaging and multiple procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parks AG, Gordon PH, Hardcastle JD (1976) A classification of fistula-in-ano. Br J Surgery 63:1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. William JG, Mac Leod A, Rothenberger A, Goldberg M (1991) Seton treatment of high anal fistulae. Br J Surgery 78:1159–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller GV, Finan PJ (1998) Flap advancement and core fistulectomy for complex rectal fistula. Br J Surgery 85:108–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Van-de-stadt J (2000) Fistula-in-ano: the place of rectal advancement Flap technique. Acta Chir Belg 100:123–127

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jun SH, Choi GS (1999) Anocutaneous advancement flap closure of high anal fistulas. Br J Surgery 86:490–492

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parkash S, Lakshmiratan V, Gajendran V (1985) Fistula-in-ano: treatment by fistulectomy, primary closure and re-construction. Aust NZ J Surgery 55:23–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mann CV, Clifton MA (1985) Re-routing of the track for the treatment of high anal and anorectal fistulae. Br J Surgery 72:134–137

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Park JJ, Cintron JR, Orsay CP, Pearl RK, Nelson RL, Sone JH et al (2000) Repair of chronic anorectal fistulae using commercial fibrin sealant. Arc Surg 135:166–169

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shoulder PJ, Crimely RP, Keighly MRB, Alexander WJ (1986) Fistula-in-ano is usually simple to treat surgically. Int J Colorectal Dis 1:113–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodsall D, Miles W (1982) Classic articles in colonic and rectal surgery. Diseases of the anus and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 25:262–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang CY (1992) Fistulotomy and marsupialization for fistula-in-ano. Singapore Med J 33:268–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Vainlevsky CA, Gordon PH (1985) Results of treatment of fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 28:225–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ralto C, Gentile F, Merico M, Spinazzola C, Mangini G, Sofo L, Doglietto G (2000) How can the assessment of fistula-in-ano be improved. Dis Colon Rectum 43:1375–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Choen S, Burnett S, Bartram CI, Nicholls RJ (1991) Comparison between anal endosongraphy and digital examination in the evaluation of anal fistulae. Br J Surgery 78:445–447

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Parks A, Stitz R (1976) The treatment of high fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 19:487–499

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lunniss P, Thompson J (1994) The loose seton. In: Phillips RKS, Lunniss PJ (eds) Anal fistula. Surgical evaluation and management. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 87–94

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kuypers H (1984) The use of the seton in the treatment of extra-sphincteric anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 27:109–110

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Belliveau P (2005) Anal fistula. In: Fazio VW, Church JM, Delaney CP (eds) Current therapy in colon and rectal surgery. Mosby, St. Louis, MO, USA, pp 27–34

    Google Scholar 

  19. Buchanan G, Owen H, Torkington J, Lunniss P, Nicholls RJ, Cohen CR (2004) Long-term outcome following loose-seton technique for external sphincter preservation in complex anal fistula. Br J Surgery 91:476–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hammond T, Grahn M, Lunniss P (2005) Fibrin glue in the management of anal fistulae. Colorectal Dis 8:308–319

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lindsey I, Smilgin-Humphreys M, Cunningham C, Mortensen N, George B (2002) A randomized controlled trial of fibrin glue vs. conventional treatment for anal fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1608–1615

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Talbot C, Sagar P, Johnston M, Finan P, Burke D (2005) Infliximab in the surgical management of complex fistulating anal Crohn’s disease. Colorectal Dis 7:164–168

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gaertner W, Decanini A, Mellgren A, Lowry A, Goldberg S, Madoff R, Spencer M (2007) Does infliximab infusion impact results of operative treatment for Crohn’s perianal fistulas? Dis Colon Rectum 50:1754–1760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M Davies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davies, M., Harris, D., Lohana, P. et al. The surgical management of fistula-in-ano in a specialist colorectal unit. Int J Colorectal Dis 23, 833–838 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0444-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-008-0444-x

Keywords

Navigation