Abstract
Introduction
Anterior knee pain is one of the most common problems after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Mobile-bearing designs should improve patella tracking with a reduced rate of patella tilt as well as reduced patellofemoral contact stresses and improve knee flexion. The aim of this dynamic in vitro investigation was to evaluate the changes of patellofemoral contact stresses after TKA using fixed and mobile-bearing designs.
Materials and methods
Seven knee specimens were mounted into a knee simulator imitating an isokinetic extension of the knee. The patellofemoral contact was measured before and after tricompartimental TKA with fixed and mobile-bearing designs using pressure-sensitive films. Contact stresses were measured from 120° knee flexion to full extension with a simulated force of the quadriceps muscle up to 1,200 N. Additionally all measurements were performed with simulated co-contraction of the hamstrings muscles.
Results
Fixed-bearing TKA increases patellofemoral contact stresses compared to physiologic conditions. After patella resurfacing, contact stresses increase even more. By changing the prosthesis design to mobile bearing, maximum contact stress was measured to be punctual higher than in fixed-bearing implants. In the interval between 0°–30° and 70°–105° of flexion, obviously lower pressures were evaluated for the mobile-bearing design. With cocontraction of the hamstrings, a lower contact stress of the mobile-bearing design was evident for the complete measurement of the knee extension.
Conclusion
An increase of patellofemoral contact stresses after patellar resurfacing in TKA could be demonstrated. This outcome implicates a higher risk of patellofemoral complications. The mobile-bearing design showed evidently lower patellofemoral contact stresses than the fixed-bearing design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrack RL, Bertot AJ, Wolfe MW, Waldman DA, Milicic M, Myers L (2001) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study with five to seven years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A:1376–1381
Benjamin JB, Szivek JA, Hammond AS, Kubchandhani Z, Matthews AI Jr, Anderson P (1998) Contact areas and pressures between native patellas and prosthetic femoral components. J Arthroplasty 13:693–698. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(98)80015-6
Bourne RB, Rorabeck CH, Vaz M, Kramer J, Hardie R, Robertson D (1995) Resurfacing versus not resurfacing the patella during total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 321:156–161
Boyd AD Jr, Ewald FC, Thomas WH, Poss R, Sledge CB (1993) Long-term complications after total knee arthroplasty with or without resurfacing of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Am 75:674–681
Campbell DG, Mintz AD, Stevenson TM (1995) Early patellofemoral revision following total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:287–291
Chowdhury EA, Porter ML (2005) A study of the effect of tibial tray rotation on a specific mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:793–797. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2004.12.058
Delport HP, Banks SA, De Schepper J, Bellemans J (2006) A kinematic comparison of fixed- and mobile-bearing knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br 88:1016–1021. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.88B8.17529
Draganich LF, Piotrowski GA, Martell J, Pottenger LA (2002) The effects of early rollback in total knee arthroplasty on stair stepping. J Arthroplasty 17:723–730. doi:10.1054/arth.2002.33558
Enis JE, Gardner R, Robledo MA, Latta L, Smith R (1990) Comparison of patellar resurfacing versus nonresurfacing in bilateral total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 260:38–42
Fuchs S, Schutte G, Witte H (1999) Effect of knee joint flexion and femur rotation on retropatellar contact of the human knee joint. Biomed Tech (Berl) 44:334–338
Fuchs S, Schutte G, Witte H, Rosenbaum D (2000) Retropatellar contact characteristics in total knee arthroplasty with and without patellar resurfacing. Int Orthop 24:191–193. doi:10.1007/s002640000140
Fuchs S, Schutte G, Witte H, Rosenbaum D (2002) What influence do size and placement of patella resurfacing have on knee endoprosthesis? Unfallchirurg 105:44–48. doi:10.1007/s113-002-8164-0
Fuchs S, Schutte G, Witte H, Rosenbaum D (2000) What retropatellar changes result by implantation of a superficial knee joint prosthesis? Unfallchirurg 103:972–976. doi:10.1007/s001130050655
Fuchs S, Skwara A, Tibesku CO, Rosenbaum D (2005) Retropatellar contact characteristics before and after total knee arthroplasty. Knee 12:9–12. doi:10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00045-5
Harwin SF (1998) Patellofemoral complications in symmetrical total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 13:753–762. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90026-2
Heegaard J, Leyvraz PF, Curnier A, Rakotomanana L, Huiskes R (1995) The biomechanics of the human patella during passive knee flexion. J Biomech 28:1265–1279. doi:10.1016/0021-9290(95)00059-Q
Li G, DeFrate LE, Zayontz S, Park SE, Gill TJ (2004) The effect of tibiofemoral joint kinematics on patellofemoral contact pressures under simulated muscle loads. J Orthop Res 22:801–806. doi:10.1016/j.orthres.2003.11.011
Matsuda S, Ishinishi T, White SE, Whiteside LA (1997) Patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty. Effect on contact area and contact stress. J Arthroplasty 12:790–797. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90010-3
McNamara JL, Collier JP, Mayor MB, Jensen RE (1994) A comparison of contact pressures in tibial and patellar total knee components before and after service in vivo. Clin Orthop Relat Res 299:104–113
Mockford BJ, Beverland DE (2005) Secondary resurfacing of the patella in mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 20:898–902. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.009
Muoneke HE, Khan AM, Giannikas KA, Hagglund E, Dunningham TH (2003) Secondary resurfacing of the patella for persistent anterior knee pain after primary knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 85:675–678
Murray DG, Webster DA (1981) The variable-axis knee prosthesis. Two-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 63:687–694
Nizard RS, Biau D, Porcher R, et al. (2005) A meta-analysis of patellar replacement in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 196–203. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000150348.17123.7f
Ostermeier S, Buhrmester O, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C (2005) Dynamic in vitro measurement of patellar movement after total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 6:30. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-6-30
Ostermeier S, Holst M, Bohnsack M, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C, Wirth CJ (2007) Dynamic measurement of patellofemoral contact pressure following reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: an in vitro study. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 22:327–335. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2006.10.002
Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Stukenborg-Colsman C (2004) Quadriceps function after TKA–an in vitro study in a knee kinematic simulator. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 19:270–276. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2003.11.006
Ostermeier S, Schlomach C, Hurschler C, Windhagen H, Stukenborg-Colsman C (2006) Dynamic in vitro measurement of posterior cruciate ligament load and tibiofemoral stress after TKA in dependence on tibiofemoral slope. Clin Biomech (Bristol Avon) 21:525–532. doi:10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2005.12.019
Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT, Stuart MJ, Hanssen AD, Jacofsky DJ (2004) Rotating platform knees did not improve patellar tracking: a prospective, randomized study of 240 primary total knee arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 221–227. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000148892.31464.81
Parvizi J, Rapuri VR, Saleh KJ, Kuskowski MA, Sharkey PF, Mont MA (2005) Failure to resurface the patella during total knee arthroplasty may result in more knee pain and secondary surgery. Clin Orthop Relat Res 438:191–196. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000166903.69075.8d
Picetti GD 3rd, McGann WA, Welch RB (1990) The patellofemoral joint after total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 72:1379–1382
Ranawat CS (2002) History of total knee replacement. J South Orthop Assoc 11:218–226
Ranawat CS (1986) The patellofemoral joint in total condylar knee arthroplasty. Pros and cons based on five- to ten-year follow-up observations. Clin Orthop Relat Res 205:93–99
Ranawat CS, Boachie-Adjei O (1988) Survivorship analysis and results of total condylar knee arthroplasty. Eight- to 11-year follow-up period. Clin Orthop Relat Res 226:6–13
Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA (1997) In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 345:60–66
Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Burmester O, Wirth CJ (2003) Dynamic in vitro measurement of retropatellar pressure after knee arthroplasty. Orthopade 32:319–322. doi:10.1007/s00132-002-0442-6
Stukenborg-Colsman C, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Wirth CJ (2002) Tibiofemoral contact stress after total knee arthroplasty: comparison of fixed and mobile-bearing inlay designs. Acta Orthop Scand 73:638–646. doi:10.1080/000164702321039598
Takeuchi T, Lathi VK, Khan AM, Hayes WC (1995) Patellofemoral contact pressures exceed the compressive yield strength of UHMWPE in total knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 10:363–368. doi:10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80186-X
von Spreckelsen L, Hahne HJ, Hassenpflug J (1998) Patellofemoral contact zones in knee endoprostheses. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 136:560–565
Waters TS, Bentley G (2003) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:212–217
Whiteside LA, Nakamura T (2003) Effect of femoral component design on unresurfaced patellas in knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 189–198. doi:10.1097/01.blo.0000063605.67412.4d
Wood DJ, Smith AJ, Collopy D, White B, Brankov B, Bulsara MK (2002) Patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 84-A:187–193
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Skwara, A., Tibesku, C.O., Ostermeier, S. et al. Differences in patellofemoral contact stresses between mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a dynamic in vitro measurement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129, 901–907 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0757-9
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-008-0757-9