Abstract
Monkey esophagus (ME) is a well-accepted substrate for diagnosing pemphigus vulgaris (PV) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). However, its availability is sometimes limited due to ethical concerns. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of human cervix (HC) as a substrate in the diagnosis of PV by IIF. Initially, serum from 1 PV patient was incubated with tissues from 48 HCs. Median IIF titers on HCs that had different demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Sera from 5 PV patients were then incubated with ME and 21 HCs. For each serum, the titer of IIF on HC that was not different from ME by more than two-fold dilutions was acceptable. Last, sera from 42 PV, 14 pemphigus foliaceous, and 62 non-pemphigus patients were used to evaluate sensitivity and specificity. The results demonstrate that differences in demographic data among HCs did not affect IIF titers. Titers obtained from ME and HC were comparable (81–100 % acceptable values). Sensitivity of HC for diagnosis of PV was better than for diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus (90.5 and 71.4 %, respectively). Specificity for PV and PF was 96.2 %. We proposed that HC substrate can be used as an alternative substrate for diagnosis of PV by IIF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DIF:
-
Direct immunofluorescence test
- ELISA:
-
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
- HC:
-
Human cervix
- IIF:
-
Indirect immunofluorescence test
- ME:
-
Monkey esophagus
- NPV:
-
Negative predictive value
- PBS:
-
Phosphate-buffered saline
- PF:
-
Pemphigus foliaceus
- PPV:
-
Positive predictive value
- PV:
-
Pemphigus vulgaris
References
Akhyani M, Chams-Davatchi C, Naraghi Z, Daneshpazhooh M, Toosi S, Asgari M, Malekhami F (2008) Cervicovaginal involvement in pemphigus vulgaris: a clinical study of 77 cases. Br J Dermatol 158:478–482
Aksu D, Peksari Y, Arica IE, Gurgey E (2010) Assessing the autoantibody levels in relation to disease severity and therapy response in pemphigus patients. Indian J Dermatol 55:342–347
Alazawi WO, Morris LS, Stanley MA, Garrod DR, Coleman N (2003) Altered expression of desmosomal components in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Virchows Arch 443:51–56
Amagai M, Hashimoto T, Green KJ, Shimizu N, Nishikawa T (1995) Antigen-specific immunoadsorption of pathogenic autoantibodies in pemphigus foliaceus. J Invest Dermatol 104:895–901
Amagai M, Hashimoto T, Shimizu N, Nishikawa T (1994) Absorption of pathogenic autoantibodies by the extracellular domain of pemphigus vulgaris antigen (Dsg3) produced by baculovirus. J Clin Invest 94:59–67
Amagai M, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR (1991) Autoantibodies against a novel epithelial cadherin in pemphigus vulgaris, a disease of cell adhesion. Cell 67:869–877
Aoki V, Huang MH, Perigo AM, Fukumori LM, Maruta CW, Santi CG, Oliveira ZN, Rivitti E (2004) Endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem) and pemphigus vulgaris: immunoglobulin G heterogeneity detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 59:251–256
Cram DL, Griffith MR, Fukuyama K (1974) Pemphigus-like antibodies in cicatricial pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol 109:235–238
Cunha PR, Bystryn JC, Medeiros EP, de Oliveira JR (2006) Sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA in detecting intercellular antibodies in endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem). Int J Dermatol 45:914–918
de Boer CJ, van Dorst E, van Krieken H, Jansen-van Rhijn CM, Warnaar SO, Fleuren GJ, Litvinov SV (1999) Changing roles of cadherins and catenins during progression of squamous intraepithelial lesions in the uterine cervix. Am J Pathol 155:505–515
Feibelman C, Stolzner G, Provost TT (1981) Pemphigus vulgaris. Superior sensitivity of monkey esophagus in the determination of pemphigus antibody. Arch Dermatol 117:561–562
Fellner MJ, Prutkin L (1970) Morbilliform eruptions caused by penicillin. A study by electron microscopy and immunologic tests. J Invest Dermatol 55:390–395
Guido RS, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M, Solomon D (2005) The distribution of neoplasia arising on the cervix: results from the ALTS trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1331–1337
Harman KE, Gratian MJ, Bhogal BS, Challacombe SJ (2000) The use of two substrates to improve the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol 142:1135–1139
Harman KE, Gratian MJ, Seed PT, Bhogal BS, Challacombe SJ, Black MM (2000) Diagnosis of pemphigus by ELISA: a critical evaluation of two ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the major pemphigus antigens, desmoglein 1 and 3. Clin Exp Dermatol 25:236–240
Heine KG, Kumar A, Jordon RE (1977) Pemphigus-like antibodies in bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol 113:1693–1695
Ioannides D, Hytiroglou P, Phelps RG, Bystryn JC (1991) Regional variation in the expression of pemphigus foliaceus, pemphigus erythematosus, and pemphigus vulgaris antigens in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 96:159–161
Judd KP, Mescon H (1979) Comparison of different epithelial substrates useful for indirect immunofluorescence testing of sera from patients with active pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol 72:314–316
Katz SI, Halprin KM, Inderbitzin TM (1969) The use of human skin for the detection of anti-epithelial autoantibodies. A diagnostic and prognostic test. J Invest Dermatol 53:390–399
Kavala M, Kocaturk OE, Demirkesen C, Can B, Zindanci I, Turkoglu Z (2007) Detection of pemphigus autoantibodies in healthy relatives of Turkish patients with pemphigus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 73:240–242
Kavala M, Topaloglu Demir F, Zindanci I, Can B, Turkoglu Z, Zemheri E, Cam OH, Teksen A (2015) Genital involvement in pemphigus vulgaris (PV): correlation with clinical and cervicovaginal Pap smear findings. J Am Acad Dermatol 73:655–659
Koulu L, Kusumi A, Steinberg MS, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR (1984) Human autoantibodies against a desmosomal core protein in pemphigus foliaceus. J Exp Med 160:1509–1518
Lobo AZ, Sousa JX Jr, Aoki V, Sotto MN, Gay Aida, de Pereyra E, Maruta CW, Santi CG (2006) Pemphigus vulgaris of the uterine cervix: misinterpretation of papanicolaou smears. Acta Derm Venereol 86:355–356
Marinović B, Fabris Z, Lipozencić J, Stulhofer Buzina D, Lakos Jukić I (2010) Comparison of diagnostic value of indirect immunofluorescence assay and desmoglein ELISA in the diagnosis of pemphigus. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 18:79–83
Mikhail GR, Drukker BH, Chow C (1967) Pemphigus vulgaris involving the cervix uteri. Arch Dermatol 95:496–498
Munhoz de Paula Alves Coelho K, Stall J, Henrique Condeixa de França P, de Cristina de Carvalho Tavares L, Stefanello Bublitz G, Loos B, Carvalho Costa L, Fronza Júnior H (2015) Pemphigus vulgaris of the cervix: diagnostic difficulties associated with the Pap test. Diagn Cytopathol 43:635–637
Nisihara RM, de Bem RS, Hausberger R, Roxo VS, Pavoni DP, Petzl-Erler ML, de Messias-Reason IJ (2003) Prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem). Arch Dermatol Res 295:133–137
Ortolan DG, Souza DPG, Aoki V, Santi CG, Gabbi TVB, Ichimura LMF, Maruta CW (2011) Analysis of the reactivity of indirect immunofluorescence in patients with pemphigus foliaceus and pemphigus vulgaris using rat bladder epithelium as a substrate. Clinics 66:2019–2023
Payne AS, Stanley JR (2012) Pemphigus. In: Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, Woplff K (eds) Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 586–599
Peck SM, Osserman KE, Rule AH (1972) Intercellular antibodies: presence in a Trichophyton rubrum infection. J Invest Dermatol 58:133–138
Quismorio FP, Bland SL, Friou GJ (1971) Autoimmunity in thermal injury: occurrence of rheumatoid factors, antinuclear antibodies and antiepithelial antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 8:701–711
Sabolinski ML, Beutner EH, Krasny S, Kumar V, Huang J, Chorzelski TP, Sampaio S, Bystryn JC (1987) Substrate specificity of anti-epithelial antibodies of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus sera in immunofluorescence tests on monkey and guinea pig esophagus sections. J Invest Dermatol 88:545–549
Sezin T, Avitan-Hersh E, Indelman M, Moscona R, Sabo E, Katz R, Pollack S, Bergman R (2014) Human amnion membrane as a substrate for the detection of autoantibodies in pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. Isr Med Assoc J 16:217–223
Torzecka JD, Narbutt J, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A, Waszczykowska E, Lukamowicz J, Pas HH (2003) Detection of pemphigus autoantibodies by IIF and ELISA tests in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus and in healthy relatives. Med Sci Monit 9:Cr528–Cr533
Wright C, Pipingas A, Grayson W, Leiman G (2000) Pemphigus vulgaris of the uterine cervix revisited: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 22:304–307
Wu H, Brandling-Bennett HA, Harrist TJ (2009) Noninfectious vesiculobullous and vesiculopustular diseases. In: Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Johnson BL, Murphy GF, Xu X (eds) Lever’s histopathology of the skin, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 235–278
Zagorodniuk I, Weltfriend S, Shtruminger L, Sprecher E, Kogan O, Pollack S, Bergman R (2005) A comparison of anti-desmoglein antibodies and indirect immunofluorescence in the serodiagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris. Int J Dermatol 44:541–544
Acknowledgments
The authors gratefully acknowledge Mr. Suthipol Udompanthurak for the statistical advice and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This was an unfunded study.
Conflict of interest
The authors hereby declare no personal or professional conflicts of interest regarding any aspect of this study.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Siriraj Institutional Review Board, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chularojanamontri, L., Tuchinda, P., Pinkaew, S. et al. Human cervix: an alternative substrate for detecting circulating pemphigus antibodies. Arch Dermatol Res 308, 437–442 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-016-1658-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-016-1658-3