Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Human cervix: an alternative substrate for detecting circulating pemphigus antibodies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Archives of Dermatological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Monkey esophagus (ME) is a well-accepted substrate for diagnosing pemphigus vulgaris (PV) by indirect immunofluorescence (IIF). However, its availability is sometimes limited due to ethical concerns. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of human cervix (HC) as a substrate in the diagnosis of PV by IIF. Initially, serum from 1 PV patient was incubated with tissues from 48 HCs. Median IIF titers on HCs that had different demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Sera from 5 PV patients were then incubated with ME and 21 HCs. For each serum, the titer of IIF on HC that was not different from ME by more than two-fold dilutions was acceptable. Last, sera from 42 PV, 14 pemphigus foliaceous, and 62 non-pemphigus patients were used to evaluate sensitivity and specificity. The results demonstrate that differences in demographic data among HCs did not affect IIF titers. Titers obtained from ME and HC were comparable (81–100 % acceptable values). Sensitivity of HC for diagnosis of PV was better than for diagnosis of pemphigus foliaceus (90.5 and 71.4 %, respectively). Specificity for PV and PF was 96.2 %. We proposed that HC substrate can be used as an alternative substrate for diagnosis of PV by IIF.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DIF:

Direct immunofluorescence test

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

HC:

Human cervix

IIF:

Indirect immunofluorescence test

ME:

Monkey esophagus

NPV:

Negative predictive value

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

PF:

Pemphigus foliaceus

PPV:

Positive predictive value

PV:

Pemphigus vulgaris

References

  1. Akhyani M, Chams-Davatchi C, Naraghi Z, Daneshpazhooh M, Toosi S, Asgari M, Malekhami F (2008) Cervicovaginal involvement in pemphigus vulgaris: a clinical study of 77 cases. Br J Dermatol 158:478–482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aksu D, Peksari Y, Arica IE, Gurgey E (2010) Assessing the autoantibody levels in relation to disease severity and therapy response in pemphigus patients. Indian J Dermatol 55:342–347

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Alazawi WO, Morris LS, Stanley MA, Garrod DR, Coleman N (2003) Altered expression of desmosomal components in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Virchows Arch 443:51–56

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amagai M, Hashimoto T, Green KJ, Shimizu N, Nishikawa T (1995) Antigen-specific immunoadsorption of pathogenic autoantibodies in pemphigus foliaceus. J Invest Dermatol 104:895–901

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Amagai M, Hashimoto T, Shimizu N, Nishikawa T (1994) Absorption of pathogenic autoantibodies by the extracellular domain of pemphigus vulgaris antigen (Dsg3) produced by baculovirus. J Clin Invest 94:59–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Amagai M, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR (1991) Autoantibodies against a novel epithelial cadherin in pemphigus vulgaris, a disease of cell adhesion. Cell 67:869–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aoki V, Huang MH, Perigo AM, Fukumori LM, Maruta CW, Santi CG, Oliveira ZN, Rivitti E (2004) Endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem) and pemphigus vulgaris: immunoglobulin G heterogeneity detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Rev Hosp Clin Fac Med Sao Paulo 59:251–256

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cram DL, Griffith MR, Fukuyama K (1974) Pemphigus-like antibodies in cicatricial pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol 109:235–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cunha PR, Bystryn JC, Medeiros EP, de Oliveira JR (2006) Sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence and ELISA in detecting intercellular antibodies in endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem). Int J Dermatol 45:914–918

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Boer CJ, van Dorst E, van Krieken H, Jansen-van Rhijn CM, Warnaar SO, Fleuren GJ, Litvinov SV (1999) Changing roles of cadherins and catenins during progression of squamous intraepithelial lesions in the uterine cervix. Am J Pathol 155:505–515

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Feibelman C, Stolzner G, Provost TT (1981) Pemphigus vulgaris. Superior sensitivity of monkey esophagus in the determination of pemphigus antibody. Arch Dermatol 117:561–562

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fellner MJ, Prutkin L (1970) Morbilliform eruptions caused by penicillin. A study by electron microscopy and immunologic tests. J Invest Dermatol 55:390–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Guido RS, Jeronimo J, Schiffman M, Solomon D (2005) The distribution of neoplasia arising on the cervix: results from the ALTS trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193:1331–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harman KE, Gratian MJ, Bhogal BS, Challacombe SJ (2000) The use of two substrates to improve the sensitivity of indirect immunofluorescence in the diagnosis of pemphigus. Br J Dermatol 142:1135–1139

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Harman KE, Gratian MJ, Seed PT, Bhogal BS, Challacombe SJ, Black MM (2000) Diagnosis of pemphigus by ELISA: a critical evaluation of two ELISAs for the detection of antibodies to the major pemphigus antigens, desmoglein 1 and 3. Clin Exp Dermatol 25:236–240

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Heine KG, Kumar A, Jordon RE (1977) Pemphigus-like antibodies in bullous pemphigoid. Arch Dermatol 113:1693–1695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ioannides D, Hytiroglou P, Phelps RG, Bystryn JC (1991) Regional variation in the expression of pemphigus foliaceus, pemphigus erythematosus, and pemphigus vulgaris antigens in human skin. J Invest Dermatol 96:159–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Judd KP, Mescon H (1979) Comparison of different epithelial substrates useful for indirect immunofluorescence testing of sera from patients with active pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol 72:314–316

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Katz SI, Halprin KM, Inderbitzin TM (1969) The use of human skin for the detection of anti-epithelial autoantibodies. A diagnostic and prognostic test. J Invest Dermatol 53:390–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kavala M, Kocaturk OE, Demirkesen C, Can B, Zindanci I, Turkoglu Z (2007) Detection of pemphigus autoantibodies in healthy relatives of Turkish patients with pemphigus. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol 73:240–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kavala M, Topaloglu Demir F, Zindanci I, Can B, Turkoglu Z, Zemheri E, Cam OH, Teksen A (2015) Genital involvement in pemphigus vulgaris (PV): correlation with clinical and cervicovaginal Pap smear findings. J Am Acad Dermatol 73:655–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Koulu L, Kusumi A, Steinberg MS, Klaus-Kovtun V, Stanley JR (1984) Human autoantibodies against a desmosomal core protein in pemphigus foliaceus. J Exp Med 160:1509–1518

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lobo AZ, Sousa JX Jr, Aoki V, Sotto MN, Gay Aida, de Pereyra E, Maruta CW, Santi CG (2006) Pemphigus vulgaris of the uterine cervix: misinterpretation of papanicolaou smears. Acta Derm Venereol 86:355–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Marinović B, Fabris Z, Lipozencić J, Stulhofer Buzina D, Lakos Jukić I (2010) Comparison of diagnostic value of indirect immunofluorescence assay and desmoglein ELISA in the diagnosis of pemphigus. Acta Dermatovenerol Croat 18:79–83

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mikhail GR, Drukker BH, Chow C (1967) Pemphigus vulgaris involving the cervix uteri. Arch Dermatol 95:496–498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Munhoz de Paula Alves Coelho K, Stall J, Henrique Condeixa de França P, de Cristina de Carvalho Tavares L, Stefanello Bublitz G, Loos B, Carvalho Costa L, Fronza Júnior H (2015) Pemphigus vulgaris of the cervix: diagnostic difficulties associated with the Pap test. Diagn Cytopathol 43:635–637

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nisihara RM, de Bem RS, Hausberger R, Roxo VS, Pavoni DP, Petzl-Erler ML, de Messias-Reason IJ (2003) Prevalence of autoantibodies in patients with endemic pemphigus foliaceus (fogo selvagem). Arch Dermatol Res 295:133–137

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ortolan DG, Souza DPG, Aoki V, Santi CG, Gabbi TVB, Ichimura LMF, Maruta CW (2011) Analysis of the reactivity of indirect immunofluorescence in patients with pemphigus foliaceus and pemphigus vulgaris using rat bladder epithelium as a substrate. Clinics 66:2019–2023

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Payne AS, Stanley JR (2012) Pemphigus. In: Goldsmith LA, Katz SI, Gilchrest BA, Paller AS, Leffell DJ, Woplff K (eds) Fitzpatrick’s dermatology in general medicine, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, pp 586–599

    Google Scholar 

  30. Peck SM, Osserman KE, Rule AH (1972) Intercellular antibodies: presence in a Trichophyton rubrum infection. J Invest Dermatol 58:133–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Quismorio FP, Bland SL, Friou GJ (1971) Autoimmunity in thermal injury: occurrence of rheumatoid factors, antinuclear antibodies and antiepithelial antibodies. Clin Exp Immunol 8:701–711

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Sabolinski ML, Beutner EH, Krasny S, Kumar V, Huang J, Chorzelski TP, Sampaio S, Bystryn JC (1987) Substrate specificity of anti-epithelial antibodies of pemphigus vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus sera in immunofluorescence tests on monkey and guinea pig esophagus sections. J Invest Dermatol 88:545–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sezin T, Avitan-Hersh E, Indelman M, Moscona R, Sabo E, Katz R, Pollack S, Bergman R (2014) Human amnion membrane as a substrate for the detection of autoantibodies in pemphigus vulgaris and bullous pemphigoid. Isr Med Assoc J 16:217–223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Torzecka JD, Narbutt J, Sysa-Jedrzejowska A, Waszczykowska E, Lukamowicz J, Pas HH (2003) Detection of pemphigus autoantibodies by IIF and ELISA tests in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and foliaceus and in healthy relatives. Med Sci Monit 9:Cr528–Cr533

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wright C, Pipingas A, Grayson W, Leiman G (2000) Pemphigus vulgaris of the uterine cervix revisited: case report and review of the literature. Diagn Cytopathol 22:304–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu H, Brandling-Bennett HA, Harrist TJ (2009) Noninfectious vesiculobullous and vesiculopustular diseases. In: Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Johnson BL, Murphy GF, Xu X (eds) Lever’s histopathology of the skin, 10th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 235–278

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zagorodniuk I, Weltfriend S, Shtruminger L, Sprecher E, Kogan O, Pollack S, Bergman R (2005) A comparison of anti-desmoglein antibodies and indirect immunofluorescence in the serodiagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris. Int J Dermatol 44:541–544

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Mr. Suthipol Udompanthurak for the statistical advice and analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Papapit Tuchinda.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This was an unfunded study.

Conflict of interest

The authors hereby declare no personal or professional conflicts of interest regarding any aspect of this study.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the Siriraj Institutional Review Board, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chularojanamontri, L., Tuchinda, P., Pinkaew, S. et al. Human cervix: an alternative substrate for detecting circulating pemphigus antibodies. Arch Dermatol Res 308, 437–442 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-016-1658-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00403-016-1658-3

Keywords

Navigation