Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effects of a clinical pathway 3 years after implementation in breast surgery

  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of the implementation of clinical pathways into routine practice of breast surgery.

Materials and methods

We implemented a clinical pathway for breast surgery in 2006 and analysed for the following 3 years its path in respect to hospital stay, total costs per case, readmission rate, and patients’ satisfaction.

Results

The mean hospital stay decreased significantly from 4.5 days in 2006 to 3.7 days in 2007 and revealed 3.4 days in 2008. This is a decrease by 24.4% for the duration of hospital stay. The total cost per case between 2006 and 2007 showed a significant decrease of 23.4%. The total costs increased by 13.4% in 2008. Readmission rate was under 5% and remained constant. Patients’ satisfaction remained constant, whereby more than 90% of the expected good results were attained.

Conclusions

There is substantial evidence that clinical pathways lead to various improvements in clinical care in surgery. We show a constantly significant effect on duration of hospital stay without any increase in the number of readmissions. In our view, it is not only an economic benefit which prevails here, but also especially a transparency of treatment which leads to higher compliance, better outcome and a shorter length of stay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ronellenfitsch U, Rössner E, Jakob J et al (2008) Clinical pathways in surgery—should we introduce them into clinical routine? A review article. Langenbecks Arch Surg 393:449–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter-Ehrenstein C, Schneider A, Krämer M et al (2009) Klinischer Behandlungspfad für die Mammachirurgie: Pfadcontrolling und Effekte. Geburtsh Frauenheilk 69:617–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Melbert RB, Kimmins MH, Isler JT et al (2002) Use of a critical pathway for colon resections. J Gastrointest Surg 6(5):745–752

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pitt HA, Murray KP, Bowman HM et al (1999) Clinical pathways implementation improves outcomes for complex biliary surgery. Surgery 126(4):751–756

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchijama K, Takifuji K, Tani M et al (2002) Effectiveness of the clinical pathway to decrease length of stay and cost for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc 16(11):1594–1597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jacavone JB, Daniels RD, Tyner I (1999) CNS facilitation of a cardiac surgery clinical pathway program. Clin Nurs Spec 13(3):126–132

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blegen MA, Reiter RC, Goode CJ et al (1995) Outcomes of hospital-based managed care: a multivariate analysis of cost and quality. Obstet Gynecol 86(5):809–814

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Stanbridge DD et al (2006) Patient perception of a clinical pathway for laparoscopic foregut surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 10(6):878–882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soria V, Pellicer E, Flores B et al (2005) Evaluation of the clinical pathway for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 71(1):40–45

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ et al (2003) Prospective, randomized controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 46(7):851–859

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones JW, McCullough LB, Richman BW (2003) The ethics of clinical pathways and cost control. J Vasc Surg 37(6):1341–1342

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Roeder N, Kuttner T (2006) Clinical pathways in view of cost effects in the DRG system. Internist (Berl) 47(7):684–689

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dy SM, Garg PP, Nyberg D et al (2003) Are critical pathways effective for reducing postoperative length of stay? Med Care 41(5):637–648

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hunter B, Segrott J (2008) Re-mapping client journeys and professional identities: a review of the literature on clinical pathways. Int J Nurs Stud 45(4):608–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Spatzker S (2006) Klinische Behandlungspfade: Ein Instrument zur Qualitätssteigerung im Krankenhaus. Klinikarzt 35(12):503–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Stephen AE, Berger DL (2003) Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery 133(3):277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gynecology, Interdisciplinary Breast Center, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany

    C. Richter-Ehrenstein & A. Schneider

  2. Medicine Controlling, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    S. Heymann

  3. Quality Management, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany

    O. Vargas Hein

Authors
  1. C. Richter-Ehrenstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Heymann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Schneider
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. Vargas Hein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Richter-Ehrenstein.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Richter-Ehrenstein, C., Heymann, S., Schneider, A. et al. Effects of a clinical pathway 3 years after implementation in breast surgery. Arch Gynecol Obstet 285, 515–520 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1994-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-011-1994-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation