Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The association of lymph node volume with cervical metastatic lesions in head and neck cancer patients

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine if volume of cervical lymph node measured via computed tomography (CT) could differentiate metastatic from benign lesions in head and neck cancer patients. We conducted a retrospective review of chart and images in a tertiary referring center in Taiwan. Patients with head and neck cancers underwent radical, modified radical or functional neck dissection were enrolled. The CT images before operation were reassessed by a radiologist and were compared with the results of pathological examination. A total of 102 patients were included for final analyses. Most patients were male (n = 96, 94%) and average age was 50.1 years. Although the average nodal volume in patients with cervical metastases was higher than those of patients without cervical metastases, it was not an independent factor associated with cervical metastasis after controlling for other variables; however, central nodal necrosis on enhanced CT image [odds ratio (OR) 18.95, P = 0.008) and minimal axial diameter >7.5 mm (OR 6.868, P = 0.001) were independent factors correlated with cervical metastasis. Therefore, the volume of cervical lymph node measured from CT images cannot predict cervical metastases in head and neck cancer patients. Measurement of minimal axial diameter of the largest lymph node is a simple and more accurate way to predict cervical metastasis instead.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Choong NW, Cohen EEW (2006) Epidermal growth factor receptor directed therapy in head and neck cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 57:25–43. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2005.06.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu SA, Tsai WC, Wong YK et al (2006) Nutritional factors and survival of patients with oral cancer. Head Neck 28:998–1007. doi:10.1002/hed.20461

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Devaney KO et al (2002) Prognostic significance of microscopic and macroscopic extracapsular spread from metastatic tumor in the cervical lymph nodes. Oral Oncol 38:747–751. doi:10.1016/S1368-8375(02)00052-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kraus DH, Joe JK (2003) Neoplasms of the oral cavity and oropharynx. In: Snow JB, Ballenger JJ (eds) Otorhinolaryngology: head and neck surgery, 16th edn. BC Decker, Hamilton, pp 1408–1440

    Google Scholar 

  5. Weissman JL (2003) Building a better mousetrap: the diagnosis of metastatic cervical adenopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:297

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. van den Brekel MWM, Stel HV, Castelijns JA et al (1990) Cervical lymph node metastasis: assessment of radiologic criteria. Radiology 177:379–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sigal R, Vogl T, Casselman J et al (2002) Lymph node metastases from head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: MR imaging with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide particles (Sinerem MR)—results of a phase-III multicenter clinical trial. Eur Radiol 12:1104–1113. doi:10.1007/s003300101130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. de Bondt RBJ, Nelemans PJ, Hofman PAM et al (2007) Detection of lymph node metastases in head and neck cancer: a meta-analysis comparing US, USgFNAC, CT and MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 4:266–272. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2007.02.037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Zenk J, Bozzato A, Steinhart H, Greess H, Iro H (2005) Metastatic and inflammatory cervical lymph nodes as analyzed by contrast-enhanced color-coded Doppler ultrasonography: quantitative dynamic perfusion patterns and histopathologic correlation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:43–47

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Akoglu E, Dutipek M, Bekis R, Degirmenci B, Ada E, Guneri A (2005) Assessment of cervical lymph node metastasis with different imaging methods in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Otolaryngol 34:384–394. doi:10.2310/7070.2005.34605

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ng SH, Yen TC, Liao CT et al (2005) 18F-FDG PET and CT/MRI in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective study of 124 patients with histologic correlation. J Nucl Med 46:1136–1143

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Schoder H, Yeung HW, Gonen M, Kraus D, Larson SM (2004) Head and neck cancer: clinical usefulness and accuracy of PET/CT image fusion. Radiology 231:65–72. doi:10.1148/radiol.2311030271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang CC, Chen MK, Liu MT, Wu HK (2002) The effect of primary tumor volumes in advanced T-staged nasopharyngeal tumors. Head Neck 24:940–946. doi:10.1002/hed.10151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Le Tourneau C, Velten M, Jung GM, Bronner G, Flesch H, Borel C (2005) Prognostic indicators for survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas: analysis of a series of 621 cases. Head Neck 27:801–808. doi:10.1002/hed.20254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Greene FL, Balch CM, Page DL et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  16. Som PM, Curtin HD, Mancuso AA (2000) Imaging-based nodal classification for evaluation of neck metastatic adenopathy. AJR 174:837–843

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Yousem DM, Som PM, Hackney DB, Schwaibold F, Hendrix RA (1992) Central nodal necrosis and extracapsular neoplastic spread in cervical lymph nodes: MR imaging versus CT. Radiology 182:753–759

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hermans R, Op de beeck K, Van den Bogaert W et al (2001) The relation of CT-determined tumor parameters and local and regional outcome of tonsillar cancer after definitive radiation treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:37–45. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(00)01559-5

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Castelijns JA, van den Brekel MWM (2002) Imaging of lymphadenopathy in the neck. Eur Radiol 12:727–738. doi:10.1007/s003300101102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morimoto Y, Kurokawa H, Tanaka T et al (2006) Correlation between the incidence of central nodal necrosis in cervical lymph node metastasis and the extent of differentiation in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 35:18–23. doi:10.1259/dmfr/24536918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mukherji SK, Armao D, Joshi VM (2001) Cervical nodal metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: shat to expect. Head Neck 23:995–1005. doi:10.1002/hed.1144

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank the Biostatistics Task Force of Taichung Veterans General Hospital for statistical analysis consulting.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shih-An Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liang, MT., Chen, C.CC., Wang, CP. et al. The association of lymph node volume with cervical metastatic lesions in head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 883–887 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0818-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0818-2

Keywords

Navigation