Skip to main content
Log in

The role of subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implant recipients

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Describe the indications and outcome of subtotal petrosectomy for cochlear implant recipients. Tertiary care referral center. This is a retrospective study of all subtotal petrosectomies and cochlear implants performed between January 2012 and December 2014. We review the charts of these patients collecting the following data: age, gender, otologic history, audiologic tests, indication of subtotal petrosectomy, data of surgery, surgical and immediate complications, late complications and follow-up of for at least 2.5 years. 12 cases of subtotal petrosectomies with cochlear implantation in 11 patients were performed during this period; 2 children and 10 adults. The indication for a cochlear implant was in 10 cases bilateral severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss and in the remaining 2 cases was asymmetric hearing loss or unilateral hearing loss. The reason for performing a subtotal petrosectomy was chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma, radical cavities from previous surgeries or electrode extrusion of previously implanted devices. All cases were performed in one stage. One patient had an infectious complication that required revision surgery and finally an explantation. No other complications are described. Subtotal petrosectomy combined with cochlear implantation is a procedure required in certain situations. It is an effective and safe procedure for managing middle ear problems and creating a safe cavity to receive a cochlear implant either in adults and children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ovesen T, Johansen LV (2009) Post-operative problems and complications in 313 consecutive cochlear implantations. J Laryngol Otol 123:492–496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Green KMJ, Bhatt YM, Saed SR et al (2004) Complications following adult cochlear implantation: experience in Manchester. J Laryngol Otol 118:417–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bendet E, Cerenko D, Linder TE et al (1998) Cochlear implantation after subtotal petrosectomies. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 255:169–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Issing PR, Schonemark MP, Winkelmann S et al (1998) Cochlear implantation in patients with chronic otitis: indications for subtotal petrosectomy and obliteration of the middle ear. Skull Base 3:127–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Leung R, Briggs RJS (2007) Indications for and outcomes of mastoid obliteration in cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 28:330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanna M, Dispenza F, Flanagan S et al (2007) Management of chronic otitis by middle ear obliteration with blind sac closure of the external auditory canal. Otol Neurotol 29:19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Free RH, Falcioni M, Di Trapani G, Giannuzzi AL, Russo A, Sanna M (2013) The role of subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implant surgery. A report of 32 cases and review on Indications. Otol Neurotol 34:1033–1040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Szymansky M, Ataide A, Linder T (2016) The use of subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implant candidates with chronic otitis media. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 273:363–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barañano CF, Kopelovich JC, Dunn CC, Gantz BJ, Hansen MR (2013) Subtotl petrosectomy and mastoid obliteration in adult and pediatric cochlear implant recipients. Otol Neurotol 34:1656–1659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. El-Kshlan HK, Arts HA, Telian SA (2003) External auditory canal closure in cochlear implant surgery. Otol Neurotol 24:404–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fisch U, Mattox D (1988) Microsurgery of the skull base. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  12. Babighian G (1993) Problems in cochlear implant surgery. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 48:65–9

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Donnelly MJ, Pyman BC, Clark GM (1995) Chronic middle ear disease and cochlear implantation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl 166:406–408

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Axon PR, Mawman DJ, Upile T, Ramsted RT (1995) Cochelar implantation in the presence of chronic suppurative otitis media. Am J Otol 16:682–686

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roehm PC, Gantz BJ (2006) Cochlear implant explantation as a sequel of severe chronic otitis media: case report and review of the literature. Otol Neurotol 27:332–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Incesulu A, Kocaturk S, Vural M (2004) Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 118:3–7

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hellingman CA, Dunnebier EA (2009) Cochlear implantation in patients with acute or chronic middle ear infectious disease: a review of the literature. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:171–176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Postelmans JTF, Stokroos RJ, Linmans HJ et al (2009) Cochlear implantation in patients with chronic otitis media: 7 years´ experience in Maastricht. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266:1159–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sanna M, Pandya Y, Mancini F, Sequino G, Piccirillo E (2011) Petrous bone cholesteatoma: classification, management and review of the literature. Audiol Neurotol 16:124–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kiefer J, von Ilberg C (1997) Special surgical problems in cochlear implant patients. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 52:135–139

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Olgun L, Batman C, Gultekin G, Kandogan T, Cerci U (2005) Cochlear implantation in chronic otitis media. J Laryngol Otol 119(12):946–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Von Ilberg C, Baumann U, Kiefer J et al (2011) Electric-acoustic stimulation of the auditory system: a review of the first decade. Audiol Neurotol 16:1–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Altuna X, Goiburu M, Navarro JJ, Palicio I (2016) Utilidad de la petrosectomía subtotal en el tratamiento de la otitis media crónica. Acta Otorinolaringol Esp 67:249 – 53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Todt I, Rademacher G, Mittmann P, Wagner J, Mutze S, Ernst A (2015) MRI artifacts and cochlear implant positioning at 3 T in vivo. Otol Neurotol 36(6):972–976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xabier Altuna.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

For this retrospective study: Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study and an approval from the IRS of our Hospital was obtained to review the charts.

Human/animal rights statement

This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altuna, X., García, L., Martínez, Z. et al. The role of subtotal petrosectomy in cochlear implant recipients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 274, 4149–4153 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4762-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-017-4762-x

Keywords

Navigation