Skip to main content
Log in

Radiologic MS disease activity during natalizumab treatment interruption: findings from RESTORE

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study is to characterize the timing and extent of radiologic MS disease recurrence during the 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption period in RESTORE. RESTORE was a randomized, partially placebo-controlled exploratory study. Natalizumab-treated patients with no gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions at screening (n = 175) were randomized 1:1:2 to continue natalizumab (n = 45), switch to placebo (n = 42), or switch to other therapies (n = 88) for 24 weeks. MRI assessments were performed every 4 weeks. Predictors of increased numbers of Gd+ lesions during natalizumab treatment interruption were evaluated. The numbers of Gd+ lesions were compared with retrospectively collected pre-natalizumab MRI reports and data from placebo-treated patients from two historical randomized clinical trials. Gd+ lesions were detected in 0 % (0/45) of natalizumab patients, 61 % (25/41) of placebo patients, and 48 % (39/81) of other-therapies patients during the randomized treatment period. Gd+ lesions were detected starting at week 12; most were observed at week 16 or later. Thirteen percent (14/107) of patients had >5 Gd+ lesions on ≥1 (of 6) scans during the randomized treatment period versus 7 % (7/107) of patients pre-natalizumab (based on medical record of a single scan). Younger patients and those with more Gd+ lesions pre-natalizumab were more likely to have increased MRI activity. Distribution of total and persistent Gd+ lesions in RESTORE patients was similar to placebo-treated historical control patients. In most patients, recurring radiological disease activity during natalizumab interruption did not exceed pre-natalizumab levels or levels seen in historical control patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Belachew S, Phan-Ba R, Bartholomé E, Delvaux V, Hansen I, Calay P, Hafsi KE, Moonen G, Tshibanda L, Vokaer M (2011) Natalizumab induces a rapid improvement of disability status and ambulation after failure of previous therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Eur J Neurol 18:240–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Putzki N, Yaldizli O, Maurer M, Cursiefen S, Kuckert S, Klawe C, Maschke M, Tettenborn B, Limmroth V (2010) Efficacy of natalizumab in second line therapy of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: results from a multi-center study in German speaking countries. Eur J Neurol 17:31–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Calabresi PA, Confavreux C, Giovannoni G, Galetta SL, Havrdova E, Lublin FD, Miller DH, O’Connor PW, Phillips JT, Polman CH, Radue EW, Rudick RA, Stuart WH, Wajgt A, Weinstock-Guttman B, Wynn DR, Lynn F, Panzara MA, AFFIRM and SENTINEL Investigators (2009) The efficacy of natalizumab in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis: subgroup analyses of AFFIRM and SENTINEL. J Neurol 256:405–415

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Polman CH, O’Connor PW, Havrdova E, Hutchinson M, Kappos L, Miller DH, Phillips JT, Lublin FD, Giovannoni G, Wajgt A, Toal M, Lynn F, Panzara MA, Sandrock AW (2006) A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 354:899–910

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloomgren G, Richman S, Hotermans C, Subramanyam M, Goelz S, Natarajan A, Lee S, Plavina T, Scanlon JV, Sandrock A, Bozic C (2012) Risk of natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy. N Engl J Med 366:1870–1880

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sorensen PS, Bertolotto A, Edan G, Giovannoni G, Gold R, Havrdova E, Kappos L, Kieseier BC, Montalban X, Olsson T (2012) Risk stratification for progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in patients treated with natalizumab. Mult Scler 18:143–152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Borriello G, Prosperini L, Mancinelli C, Gianni C, Fubelli F, Pozzilli C (2012) Pulse monthly steroids during an elective interruption of natalizumab: a post-marketing study. Eur J Neurol 19:783–787

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Borriello G, Prosperini L, Marinelli F, Fubelli F, Pozzilli C (2011) Observations during an elective interruption of natalizumab treatment: a post-marketing study. Mult Scler 17:372–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kaufman MD, Lee R, Norton HJ (2011) Course of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis before, during and after natalizumab. Mult Scler 17:490–494

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Killestein J, Vennegoor A, Strijbis EM, Seewann A, van Oosten BW, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH (2010) Natalizumab drug holiday in multiple sclerosis: poorly tolerated. Ann Neurol 68:392–395

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. West TW, Cree BA (2010) Natalizumab dosage suspension: are we helping or hurting? Ann Neurol 68:395–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Magraner MJ, Coret F, Navarre A, Bosca I, Simo M, Escutia M, Bernad A, Navarro L, Casanova B (2011) Pulsed steroids followed by glatiramer acetate to prevent inflammatory activity after cessation of natalizumab therapy: a prospective, 6-month observational study. J Neurol 258:1805–1811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Havla J, Gerdes LA, Meinl I, Krumbholz M, Faber H, Weber F, Pellkofer HL, Hohlfeld R, Kumpfel T (2011) De-escalation from natalizumab in multiple sclerosis: recurrence of disease activity despite switching to glatiramer acetate. J Neurol 258:1665–1669

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rossi S, Motta C, Studer V, De Chiara V, Barbieri F, Monteleone F, Fornasiero A, Coarelli G, Bernardi G, Cutter G, Stuve O, Salvetti M, Centonze D (2013) Effect of glatiramer acetate on disease reactivation in MS patients discontinuing natalizumab. Eur J Neurol 20:87–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kerbrat A, Le Page E, Leray E, Anani T, Coustans M, Desormeaux C, Guiziou C, Kassiotis P, Lallement F, Laplaud D, Diraison P, Rouhart F, Sartori E, Wardi R, Wiertlewski S, Edan G (2011) Natalizumab and drug holiday in clinical practice: an observational study in very active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. J Neurol Sci 308:98–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Miravalle A, Jensen R, Kinkel RP (2011) Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome in patients with multiple sclerosis following cessation of natalizumab therapy. Arch Neurol 68:186–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. O’Connor PW, Goodman A, Kappos L, Lublin FD, Miller DH, Polman C, Rudick RA, Aschenbach W, Lucas N (2011) Disease activity return during natalizumab treatment interruption in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neurology 76:1858–1865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vellinga MM, Castelijns JA, Barkhof F, Uitdehaag BM, Polman CH (2008) Postwithdrawal rebound increase in T2 lesional activity in natalizumab-treated MS patients. Neurology 70:1150–1151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rinaldi F, Seppi D, Calabrese M, Perini P, Gallo P (2012) Switching therapy from natalizumab to fingolimod in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging findings. Mult Scler 18:1640–1643

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sempere AP, Martin-Medina P, Berenguer-Ruiz L, Perez-Carmona N, Sanchez-Perez R, Polache-Vengud J, Feliu-Rey E (2013) Switching from natalizumab to fingolimod: an observational study. Acta Neurol Scand 128:e6–e10

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rigau V, Mania A, Befort P, Carlander B, Jonquet O, Lassmann H, Camu W, Thouvenot E (2012) Lethal multiple sclerosis relapse after natalizumab withdrawal. Neurology 79:2214–2216

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lenhard T, Biller A, Mueller W, Metz I, Schonberger J, Wildemann B (2010) Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome after withdrawal of natalizumab? Neurology 75:831–833

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hellwig K, Gold R (2011) Immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome after withdrawal of natalizumab? Neurology 76:1362–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Stüve O, Cravens PD, Frohman EM, Phillips JT, Remington GM, von Geldern G, Cepok S, Singh MP, Tervaert JW, De Baets M, MacManus D, Miller DH, Radu EW, Cameron EM, Monson NL, Zhang S, Kim R, Hemmer B, Racke MK (2009) Immunologic, clinical, and radiologic status 14 months after cessation of natalizumab therapy. Neurology 72:396–401

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fox RJ, Cree B, De Seze J, Gold R, Hartung H-P, Jeffery D, Kappos L, Kaufman M, Montalban X, Weinstock-Guttman B, Anderson B, Natarajan A, Ticho B, Duda P (2014) MS disease activity in RESTORE: a randomized 24-week natalizumab treatment interruption study. Neurology 82:1491–1498

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miller DH, Khan OA, Sheremata WA, Blumhardt LD, Rice GP, Libonati MA, Willmer-Hulme AJ, Dalton CM, Miszkiel KA, O’Connor PW (2003) A controlled trial of natalizumab for relapsing multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med 348:15–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kappos L, Gold R, Miller DH, Macmanus DG, Havrdova E, Limmroth V, Polman CH, Schmierer K, Yousry TA, Yang M, Eraksoy M, Meluzinova E, Rektor I, Dawson KT, Sandrock AW, O’Neill GN (2008) Efficacy and safety of oral fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Lancet 372(9648):1463–1472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Centonze D, Rossi S, Rinaldi F, Gallo P (2012) Severe relapses under fingolimod treatment prescribed after natalizumab. Neurology 79:2004–2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tubridy N, Behan PO, Capildeo R, Chaudhuri A, Forbes R, Hawkins CP, Hughes RA, Palace J, Sharrack B, Swingler R, Young C, Moseley IF, Macmanus DG, Donoghue S, Miller DH (1999) The effect of anti-alpha4 integrin antibody on brain lesion activity in MS. The UK Antegren Study Group. Neurology 53:466–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sahraian MA, Radue EW, Eshaghi A, Besliu S, Minagar A (2012) Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: a review of the neuroimaging features and differential diagnosis. Eur J Neurol 19:1060–1069

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kappos L, Bates D, Edan G, Eraksoy M, Garcia-Merino A, Grigoriadis N, Hartung HP, Havrdova E, Hillert J, Hohlfeld R, Kremenchutzky M, Lyon-Caen O, Miller A, Pozzilli C, Ravnborg M, Saida T, Sindic C, Vass K, Clifford DB, Hauser S, Major EO, O’Connor PW, Weiner HL, Clanet M, Gold R, Hirsch HH, Radu EW, Sorensen PS, King J (2011) Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: updated recommendations for patient selection and monitoring. Lancet Neurol 10:745–758

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Dong-Si T, Richman S, Bloomgren G, Wenten M, Philip J, Datta S, McIninch M, Bozic C, Ticho B, Richert N (2013) Survival and functional outcome in asymptomatic natalizumab-associated progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 19(suppl 1):397 (P879)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Biogen Idec provided funding for editorial support in the development of this paper; Britt Anderson, PhD, from Infusion Communications wrote the first draft of the manuscript based on input from authors, and Josh Safran and Jackie Cannon from Infusion Communications copyedited and styled the manuscript per journal requirements. Biogen Idec reviewed and provided feedback on the paper to the authors. The authors had full editorial control of the paper and provided their final approval of all content. This study was funded by Biogen Idec Inc.

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Kaufman has received honoraria and research support from Biogen Idec, has received financial support from Bayer, EMD Serono, Novartis, and Teva, and is a consultant for Department of Defense. Dr. Cree has received consulting honoraria from AbbVie, Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, Genzyme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva Neurosciences. Dr. De Sèze has received honoraria from Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, LFB, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva. Dr. Fox has received consultant fees from Allozyne, Avanir, Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, Novartis, Questcor, Teva, and Xenoport and has received research support from Biogen Idec and Novartis. Dr. Gold has received research support and honoraria from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, and Teva, is Editor-in-Chief of Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, has received a license fee from Biogen Idec (no future rights), and has received research support from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, and Teva. Dr. Hartung has received honoraria for consulting and speaking at symposia from Bayer HealthCare, Biogen Idec, BioMS, Genzyme, Merck Serono, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi, and Teva. Dr. Jeffery is a consultant for Acorda, Bayer HealthCare, EMD Serono, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Questcor, and Teva, and has received research support from Berlex, Biogen Idec, Novartis, Pfizer, and Teva. Dr. Kappos has received research support from Acorda, Actelion, Allozyne, BaroFold, Bayer HealthCare, Bayer Schering, Bayhill, Biogen Idec, Boehringer Ingelheim, Elan, Genmab, GlaxoSmithKline, Glenmark, Merck Serono, MediciNova, Novartis, Sanofi, Santhera, Shire, Roche, Teva, UCB, Wyeth, the Swiss MS Society, the Swiss National Research Foundation, the European Union, the Gianni Rubatto Foundation, and the Novartis and Roche Research Foundations. Dr. Montalbán has received speaking honoraria and travel expenses for scientific meetings, has been a steering committee member of clinical trials, or has participated in advisory boards of clinical trials in the past years with Almirall, Bayer Schering, Biogen Idec, EMD Merck Serono, Genentech, Genzyme, Novartis, Sanofi, and Teva. Dr. Weinstock-Guttman has received honoraria for speaking and serving on scientific advisory boards from Acorda, Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, and Teva and has received financial support for research from Acorda, Biogen Idec, EMD Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, and Teva. Drs. Duda and Ticho were employees of Biogen Idec at the time of the study and manuscript preparation. Drs. Pace and Campagnolo are employees of Biogen Idec.

Ethical standard

Each site’s institutional review board reviewed and approved the study protocol and amendments, and all participants provided written informed consent. The RESTORE study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and International Conference on Harmonisation Guideline on Good Clinical Practice.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kaufman.

Additional information

Drs. Ticho and Duda are former employees of Biogen Idec Inc. and were at the company during study conduct.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaufman, M., Cree, B.A.C., De Sèze, J. et al. Radiologic MS disease activity during natalizumab treatment interruption: findings from RESTORE. J Neurol 262, 326–336 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7558-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-014-7558-6

Keywords

Navigation