Erratum to: J Neurol (2016) 263:883–887 DOI 10.1007/s00415-016-8073-8
The author would like to correct the errors in the publication of the original article. The corrected details are given below for your reading.
In the Introduction, the word “since” has been omitted. The correct sentence is: “Since a positive cross-over sham-controlled, use of plasma exchange (PLEX) had been widely accepted…”
In the Table 1:
It is not “Time to MP, median (mean; range) months” but “Time to MP, median (mean; range) days”.
It is not “Time to PLEX, median (mean; range), months” but “Time to PLEX, median (mean; range), days”.
It is not “Number of PLEX, median (mean; range), months” but “Number of PLEX, median (mean; range)”.
It is not “LogMAR VA before PLEX, median (mean; range), days” but “LogMAR VA before PLEX, median (mean; range)”.
It is not “LogMAR VA after PLEX, median (mean; range), days” but “LogMAR VA after PLEX, median (mean; range)”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The online version of the original article can be found under doi:10.1007/s00415-016-8073-8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Deschamps, R., Gueguen, A., Parquet, N. et al. Erratum to: Plasma exchange response in 34 patients with severe optic neuritis. J Neurol 264, 1547 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8534-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-017-8534-8