Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical correlates to the goniodysgensis among juvenile-onset primary open-angle glaucoma patients

  • Glaucoma
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate gonioscopic features and relate them to clinical characteristics in eyes with juvenile-onset primary open-angle glaucoma (JOAG).

Methods

Goniophotographs of unrelated JOAG patients, presenting between 10–40 years of age, were evaluated and compared with 60 healthy subjects in the same age group. Age of onset, family history of glaucoma, highest untreated IOP and visual field defect (mean deviation) were analyzed and correlated with the gonioscopic features among JOAG patients.

Results

Of 126 patients included in the study, 44 (34 %) had a normal open angle (group 1), while 82 (66 %) had developmental anomalies (group 2). Developmental anomalies of the angle were classified as: high iris insertion with or without prominent iris processes (n = 42), a featureless angle (n = 30), and those with prominent iris processes alone (n = 10). There was no difference in age of onset (group 1, 30.5 ± 7 years and group 2, 26.3 ± 9.6 years) (p = 0.07) or the untreated IOP at presentation (group 1; 36 ± 12.5 mmHg and group 2, 38.8 ± 12.3 mmHg; p = 0.37) between the groups. However, those with angle anomalies presented with a greater visual field defect (MD −23.5 ± 10.5 vs −14.8 ± 13 dB; p = 0.02) compared to those with normal appearing angle.

Conclusions

While two thirds of JOAG patients present with developmental anomalies of the angle, one third have normal appearing angles. High insertion of the iris is the most common form of gonio dysgenesis observed. Those with angle dysgenesis are more likely to present with severe disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leydhecker W (1979) Simple glaucoma before the age of 30 years. Ophthalmologica 178:32–36

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ko YC, Liu CJ, Chou JC, Chen MR, Hsu WM, Liu JH (2002) Comparisons of risk factors and visual field changes between juvenile-onset and late-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 216:27–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jonas JB, Grundler A (1996) Optic disc morphology in juvenile primary open-angle glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 234:750–754

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wiggs JL, Damji KF, Haines JL, Pericak-Vance MA, Allingham RR (1996) The distinction between juvenile- and adult-onset primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Hum Genet 58:243–244

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Turalba AV, Chen TC (2008) Clinical and genetic characteristics of primary juvenile-onset open-angle glaucoma (JOAG). Semin Ophthalmol 23:19–25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Goldwyn R, Waltman SR, Becker B (1970) Primary open-angle glaucoma in adolescents and young adults. Arch Ophthalmol 84:579–582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lotufo D, Ritch R, Szmyd L Jr, Burris JE (1989) Juvenile glaucoma, race, and refraction. JAMA 261:249–252

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gupta V, Gupta S, Dhawan M, Sharma A, Kapoor KS, Sihota R (2011) Extent of asymmetry and unilaterality among juvenile onset primary open angle glaucoma patients. Clin Exp Ophthalmol 39(7):633–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bayat B, Yazdani S, Alavi A, Chiani M, Chitsazian F, Tusi BK, Suri F, Narooie-Nejhad M, Sanati MH, Elahi E (2008) Contributions of MYOC and CYP1B1 mutations to JOAG. Mol Vis 14:508–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen X, Yan N, Yun H, Sun J, Yu M, Zhou J, Cao G, Yin H, Li M, Liu X (2009) Sequence analysis of MYOC and CYP1B1 in a Chinese pedigree of juvenile glaucoma with goniodysgenesis. Mol Vis 15:1530–1536

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Jerndal T (1970) Goniodysgenesis and hereditary juvenile glaucoma. A clinical study of a Swedish pedigree. Acta Ophthalmol Suppl 107:3–100

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pang CP, Fan BJ, Canlas O, Wang DY, Dubois S, Tam PO, Lam DS, Raymond V, Ritch R (2006) A genome-wide scan maps a novel juvenile-onset primary open angle glaucoma locus to chromosome 5q. Mol Vis 12:85–92

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wiggs JL, Del Bono EA, Schuman JS, Hutchinson BT, Walton DS (1995) Clinical features of five pedigrees genetically linked to the juvenile glaucoma locus on chromosome 1q21-q31. Ophthalmology 102:1782–1789

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gorin G (1964) Developmental glaucoma. A concept based on correlation of gonioscopic findings with clinical manifestations. Am J Ophthalmol 58:572–580

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tawara A, Inomata H (1984) Developmental immaturity of the trabecular meshwork in juvenile glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 98:82–97

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kupfer C, Ross K (1971) The development of outflow facility in human eyes. Invest Ophthalmol 10:513–517

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rojas B, Ramirez AI, de-Hoz R, Salazar JJ, Remirez JM, Trivino A (2006) Structural changes of the anterior chamber angle in primary congenital glaucoma with respect to normal development. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 81:65–71

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hollander DA, Sarfarazi M, Stoilov I, Wood IS, Fredrick DR, Alvarado JA (2006) Genotype and phenotype correlations in congenital glaucoma: CYP1B1 mutations, goniodysgenesis, and clinical characteristics. Am J Ophthalmol 142:993–1004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Barkan O (1955) Pathogenesis of congenital glaucoma: gonioscopic and anatomic observation of the angle of the anterior chamber in the normal eye and in congenital glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 40:1–11

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Jerndal T, Lind A (1979) New aspects on the heredity of open angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 57:826–831

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Geijssen HC, Greve EL (1987) The spectrum of primary open angle glaucoma. I: Senile sclerotic glaucoma versus high tension glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surg 18:207–213

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ikui H, Fukuda H (1968) Controversial aspects of gonioscopic findings and anatomical structures of the anterior chamber angle. Nippon Ganka Kiyo 19(8):900–904

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Verbraak FD, vd Berg W, Delleman JW, Greve EL (1994) Goniodysgenesis in familial primary open-angle glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 72:98–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Vincent AL, Billingsley G, Buys Y, Levin AV, Priston M, Trope G, Williams-Lyn D, Heon E (2002) Digenic inheritance of early-onset glaucoma: CYP1B1, a potential modifier gene. Am J Hum Genet 70:448–460

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Choudhary D, Jansson I, Rezaul K, Han DK, Sarfarazi M, Schenkman JB (2007) Cyp1b1 protein in the mouse eye during development: an immunohistochemical study. Drug Metab Dispos 35:987–994

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Chakrabarti S, Ghanekar Y, Kaur K, Kaur I, Mandal AK, Rao KN, Parikh RS, Thomas R, Majumder PP (2010) A polymorphism in the CYP1B1 promoter is functionally associated with primary congenital glaucoma. Hum Mol Genet 19:4083–4090

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viney Gupta.

Additional information

No financial support has been received by any authors, and none of the authors has any proprietary interest in the subject matter presented.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gupta, V., Srivastava, R.M., Rao, A. et al. Clinical correlates to the goniodysgensis among juvenile-onset primary open-angle glaucoma patients. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 251, 1571–1576 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2262-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-013-2262-2

Keywords

Navigation