Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aniseikonia in various retinal disorders

  • Retinal Disorders
  • Published:
Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose was to quantify and compare the severity of aniseikonia in patients undergoing vitrectomy for various retinal disorders.

Methods

We studied 357 patients with retinal disorders including epiretinal membrane (ERM), macular hole (MH), cystoid macular edema with branch / central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO-CME / CRVO-CME), diabetic macular edema (DME), macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (M-off RD), and macula-on RD (M-on RD) as well as 31 normal controls. The amount of aniseikonia was measured using the New Aniseikonia Test preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively.

Results

Of all patients, 59% presented aniseikonia. Preoperative and postoperative mean aniseikonia were 4.0 ± 4.1% and 3.0 ± 3.6%, respectively. In particular, 68% of patients with ERM had macropsia, and approximately half of MH, RVO-CME, DME, and M-off RD patients had micropsia. Preoperative aniseikonia was significantly severe in ERM than in other disorders. Vitrectomy improved aniseikonia only in MH, while visual acuity was improved in all disorders except CRVO-CME.

Conclusion

More than half of the patients showed aniseikonia preoperatively. A majority of ERM patients exhibited macropsia, whereas MH, RVO-CME, DME, and macula-off RD patients presented micropsia. The aniseikonia score was greatest in ERM patients. In most retinal disorders, surgery significantly improved visual acuity, but not aniseikonia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berens C, Aniseikonia BRE (1963) A present appraisal and some practical considerations. Arch Ophthalmol 70:181–188

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kramer PW, Lubkin V, Pavlica M, Covin R (1999) Symptomatic aniseikonia in unilateral and bilateral pseudophakia. A projection space eikonometer study. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 14:183–190

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Katsumi O, Miyanaga Y, Hirose T et al (1988) Binocular function in unilateral aphakia. Correlation with aniseikonia and stereoacuity. Ophthalmology 95:1088–1093

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Crone RA, Leuridan OM (1975) Unilateral aphakia and tolerance of aniseikonia. Ophthalmologica 171:258–263

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Snead MP, Lea SH, Rubinstein MP et al (1991) Aniseikonia: a method of objective assessment in pseudophakia using geometric optics. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 11:109–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Häring G, Gronemeyer A, Hedderich J, de Decker W (1999) Stereoacuity and aniseikonia after unilateral and bilateral implantation of the Array refractive multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 25:1151–1156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Katsumi O, Miyajima H, Ogawa T, Hirose T (1992) Aniseikonia and stereoacuity in pseudophakic patients. Unilateral and bilateral cases. Ophthalmology 99:1270–1277

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gobin L, Rozema JJ, Tassignon MJ (2008) Predicting refractive aniseikonia after cataract surgery in anisometropia. J Cataract Refract Surg 34:1353–1361

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benegas NM, Egbert J, Engel WK, Kushner BJ (1999) Diplopia secondary to aniseikonia associated with macular disease. Arch Ophthalmol 117:896–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Wit GC, Muraki CS (2006) Field-dependent aniseikonia associated with an epiretinal membrane a case study. Ophthalmology 113:58–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ugarte M, Williamson TH (2005) Aniseikonia associated with epiretinal membranes. Br J Ophthalmol 89:1576–1580

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y et al (2014) Time course of changes in aniseikonia and foveal microstructure after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmology 121:2255–2260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung H, Son G, Hwang DJ et al (2015) Relationship Between Vertical and Horizontal Aniseikonia Scores and Vertical and Horizontal OCT Images in Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 56:6542–6548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Han J, Han SH, Kim JH, Koh HJ (2016) Restoration of retinally induced aniseikonia in patients with epiretinal membrane after early vitrectomy. Retina 36:311–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rutstein RP (2012) Retinally induced aniseikonia: a case series. Optom Vis Sci 89:e50–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Curtin BJ, Linksz A, Shafer DM (1959) Aniseikonia following retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 47:468–471

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ugarte M, Williamson TH (2006) Horizontal and vertical micropsia following macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal-detachment surgical repair. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 244:1545–1548

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sjöstrand J, Anderson C (1986) Micropsia and metamorphopsia in the re-attached macula following retinal detachment. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh) 64:425–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Okamoto F, Sugiura Y, Okamoto Y et al (2014) Aniseikonia and Foveal Microstructure after Retinal Detachment Surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 55:4880–4885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee HN, Lin KH, Tsai HY et al (2014) Aniseikonia following pneumatic retinopexy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 158:1056–1061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Frisén L, Frisén M (1979) Micropsia and visual acuity in macular edema. A study of the neuro-retinal basis of visual acuity. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 210:69–77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hisada H, Awaya S (1992) Aniseikonia of central serous chorioretinopathy. Nihon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi 96:369–374

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. de Wit GC (2008) Clinical usefulness of the Aniseikonia Inspector: a review. Binocul Vis Strabismus Q 23:207–214

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Asaria R, Garnham L, Gregor ZJ, Sloper JJ (2008) A prospective study of binocular visual function before and after successful surgery to remove a unilateral epiretinal membrane. Ophthalmology 115:1930–1937

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Murakami T, Tsujikawa A, Ohta M et al (2007) Photoreceptor status after resolved macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion treated with tissue plasminogen activator. Am J Ophthalmol 143:171–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lardenoye CW, Probst K, DeLint PJ, Rothova A (2000) Photoreceptor function in eyes with macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 41:4048–4053

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wright LA, Cleary M, Barrie T, Hammer HM (1999) Motility and binocularity outcomes in vitrectomy versus scleral buckling in retinal detachment surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 237:1028–1032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Pesin SR, Olk RJ, Grand MG et al (1991) Vitrectomy for premacular fibroplasia: prognostic factors, long-term follow-up, and time course of visual improvement. Ophthalmology 98:1109–1114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oshima Y, Yamanishi S, Sawa M et al (2000) Two-year follow-up study comparing primary vitrectomy with scleral buckling for macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:538–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang SD, Kim IT (2000) Long-term visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment involving the macula. Korean J Ophthalmol 14:20–26

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumiki Okamoto.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this research.

Conflict of Interest

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Okamoto, F., Sugiura, Y., Okamoto, Y. et al. Aniseikonia in various retinal disorders. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 255, 1063–1071 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3597-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-017-3597-x

Keywords

Navigation