Skip to main content
Log in

Suppression of the E-effect during the subjective visual and postural vertical test in healthy subjects

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Applied Physiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study the influence of head-on-body and starting roll position of laser bar and chair was investigated on the perception of, respectively, the visual and postural vertical. Sixty-one subjects, between 21 and 82 years, participated in this study. Results show that head-on-body and starting roll position of laser bar or chair have an influence on the outcome for both subjective visual vertical test (SVV) and subjective postural vertical test (SPV). When head-on-body and starting roll positions are combined the E-effect (deviation of the SVV–SPV opposite to the head-on-body tilt, when the roll tilt of the head is <60°–70°) is observed in the anti-parallel condition, but is suppressed when starting roll position of laser bar or chair are relatively parallel to the length axis of the tilted head. It is suggested that in the assessment of the SVV, when the laser bar is aligned with the length axis of the head (parallel condition), the oblique effect occurs. In the assessment of the SPV, the E-effect is also suppressed in the parallel condition. It is hypothesized that in the parallel conditions, the gravitational reference frames of head and trunk are more aligned with each other providing similar information. In the anti-parallel conditions the reference frames of head and trunk are malaligned, providing contrary input making the estimation of the earth vertical more difficult. It seems that SVV and SPV measurements are influenced by head-on-body and starting roll positions and has to be taken into account in further studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appelle S (1972) Perception and discrimination as a function of stimulus orientation: the "oblique effect" in man and animals. Psychol Bull 78(4):266–278

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aubert H (1861) Eine scheinbare bedeutende Drehung von Objeckten bei Neigung des Kopfes nach rechts und links. Arch Pathol Anat 20:381–393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri G, Gissot AS, Pérennou D (2009) Ageing of the postural vertical. Age (Epub ahead of print)

  • Bonan IV, Guettard E, Leman MC, Colle FM, Yelnik AP (2006a) Subjective visual vertical perception relates to balance in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 87(5):642–646

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan IV, Leman MC, Legargasson JF, Guichard JP, Yelnik AP (2006b) Evolution of subjective visual vertical perturbation after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 20(4):484–491

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonan IV, Hubeaux K, Gellez-Leman MC, Guichard JP, Vicaut E, Yelnik AP (2007) Influence of subjective visual vertical misperception on balance recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 78:49–55

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan-Smith HM, Heeley DW (1993) Anisotropic axes in orientation perception are not retinotopically mapped. Perception 22(12):1389–1402

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen S, Levi DM (1996) Meridional anisotropy in the discrimination of parallel and perpendicular lines—effect of body tilt. Perception 25(6):633–649

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerraz M, Poquin D, Luyat M, Ohlman T (1998) Head orientation involvement in assessment of the subjective vertical during whole body tilt. Percept Mot Skills 87:643–648

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guerraz M, Luyat M, Poquin D, Ohlmann T (2000) The role of neck afferents in subjective orientation in the visual and tactile sensory modalities. Acta Otolaryngol 20(6):735–738

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoppenbrouwers M, Wuyts F, Van de Heyning P (2004) Suppression of the E-effect during the subjective visual vertical test. Neuroreport 15(2):325–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Howard IP (1982) Human visual orientation. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnath HO, Ferber J, Dichgans J (2000a) The neural representation of postural control in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci 25:13931–13936

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karnath HO, Ferber S, Dichgans J (2000b) The origin of contraversive pushing: evidence for a second graviceptive system in humans. Neurology 55:1298–1304

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lafosse C, Kerckhofs E, Troch M, Santens P, Vandenbussche E (2004) Graviceptive misperception of the postural vertical after right hemisphere damage. Neuroreport 15:887–891

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lafosse C, Kerckhofs E, Vereeck L, Troch M, Van Hoydonck G, Moeremans M, Sneyers C, Broeckx J, Dereymaeker L (2007) Postural abnormalities and contraversive pushing following right hemisphere brain damage. Neuropsychol Rehabil 17(3):374–396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Luyat M, Gentaz E, Corte TR, Guerraz M (2001) Reference frames and haptic perception of orientation: body and head tilt effects on the oblique effect. Percept Psychophys 63(3):541–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masani K, Sin VW, Vette AH, Thrasher TA, Kawashima N, Morris A, Preuss R, Popovic MR (2009) Postural reactions of the trunk muscles to multi-directional perturbations in sitting. Clin Biomech 24(2):176–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt H (1992) Somatic versus vestibular gravity reception in man. Ann NY Acad Sci 656:124–139

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt H (1998) Origin and processing of postural information. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 22(4):473–478

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GE (1916) Über das Aubertsche Phänomen. Z Sinnesphysiol 49:109–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen PM, Wandel A, Jørgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS (1996) Ipsilateral pushing in stroke: incidence, relation to neuropsychological symptoms, and impact on rehabilitation. The Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77(1):25–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pérennou D (2006) Postural disorders and spatial neglect in stroke patients: a strong association. Restor Neurol Neurosci 24(4–6):319–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peurala SH, Könönen P, Pitkänen K, Sivenius J, Tarkka IM (2007) Postural instability in patients with chronic stroke. Restor Neurol Neurosci 25(2):101–108

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rock I (1990) The frame of reference. In: Rock I (ed) The legacy of Solomon Asch. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 243–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Saj A, Honoré J, Bernati T, Coello Y, Rousseaux M (2005) Subjective visual vertical in pitch and roll in right hemispheric stroke. Stroke 36(3):588–591

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway-Cook A, Woollacot MH (2006) Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, Feys H, Thijs V, Vaes K, De Weerdt W (2005) Discriminant ability of the trunk impairment scale: a comparison between stroke patients and healthy individuals. Disabil Rehabil 28:1382–1385

    Google Scholar 

  • Vibert D, Häusler R (2000) Long-term evolution of subjective visual vertical after vestibular neurectomy and labyrinthectomy. Acta Otolaryngol 120:620–622

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wade NJ (1992) The representation of orientation in vision. Aust J Psychol 44:139–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yelnik AP, Lebreton FO, Bonan IV, Colle FM, Meurin FA, Guichard JP, Vicaut E (2002) Perception of verticality after recent cerebral hemispheric stroke. Stroke 33(9):2247–2253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Youdas JW, Garrett TR, Suman VJ, Bogard CL, Hallman HO, Carey JR (1992) Normal range of motion of the cervical spine: an initial goniometric study. Phys Ther 72(11):770–780

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to al the co-workers and subjects who participated in this study. Thanks to Conor McGuire for his help with the translation of this paper. Special thanks for corporation to the rehabilitation center Hof ter Schelde, Antwerp.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim Saeys.

Additional information

Communicated by Fausto Baldissera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saeys, W., Vereeck, L., Bedeer, A. et al. Suppression of the E-effect during the subjective visual and postural vertical test in healthy subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 109, 297–305 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1355-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-010-1355-4

Keywords

Navigation