Abstract
Loading of the skeleton is important for the development of a functionally and mechanically appropriate bone structure, and can be achieved through impact exercise. Proximal femur cross-sectional geometry was assessed in the male athletes (n = 55) representing gymnastics, endurance running and swimming, and non-athletic controls (n = 22). Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (iDXA, GE Healthcare, UK) measurements of the total body (for body composition) and the left proximal femur were obtained. Advanced hip structural analysis (AHA) was utilised to determine the areal bone mineral density (aBMD), hip axis length (HAL), cross-sectional area (CSA), cross-sectional moment of inertia (CSMI) and the femoral strength index (FSI). Gymnasts and runners had greater age, height and weight adjusted aBMD than in swimmers and controls (p < 0.05). Gymnasts and runners had greater resistance to axial loads (CSA) and the runners had increased resistance against bending forces (CSMI) compared to swimmers and controls (p < 0.01). Controls had a lower FSI compared to gymnasts and runners (1.4 vs. 1.8 and 2.1, respectively, p < 0.005). Lean mass correlated with aBMD, CSA and FSI (r = 0.365–0.457, p < 0.01), particularly in controls (r = 0.657–0.759, p < 0.005). Skeletal loading through the gymnastics and running appears to confer a superior bone geometrical advantage in the young adult men. The importance of lean body mass appears to be of particular significance for non-athletes. Further characterisation of the bone structural advantages associated with different sports would be of value to inform the strategies directed at maximising bone strength and thus, preventing fracture.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Beck TJ, Ruff CB, Warden KE, Scott WW, Rao GU (1990) Predicting femoral neck strength form bone mineral data: a structural approach. Invest Radiol 25(1):6–18
Brenban S, Chappard C, Jaffre C et al. (2011) Positive influence of long lasting and intensive weight bearing physical activity on hip structure of young adults. J Clin Densitom [EPub ahead of print]
DiVasta AD, Beck TJ, Petit M, Felderman HA, LeBoff MS, Gordon CM (2007) Bone cross sectional geometry in adolescent girls and young women with anorexia-nervosa: a hip structural analysis study. Osteoporos Int 18:797–804
Duan Y, Duboeuf F, Munoz F, Delmas PD, Seeman E (2006) The fracture risk index and use as prediction of vertebral structural failure. Osteoporos Int 17(1):54–60
Faulkner KG, Wacker WK, Barden C, Simonelli C, Burke PK, Ragi S, Del Rio L (2006) Femur strength index predicted hip fractures independent of bone density and hip axis length. Osteoporos Int 17(4):593–599
Forwood MR, Turner CH (1995) Skeletal adaptations to mechanical usage: results from tibial loading studies in rats. Bone 17(4):S197–S205
Fredricson M, Chew K, Ngo J, Cleek T, Kiratti J, Cobb K (2007) Regional bone mineral density in men athletes: a comparison of soccer players, runners and controls. Br J Sp Med 41:664–668
Haapasalo H, Kontulainen S, Sievanen H, Kannus P, Jarvinen M, Vuori I (2000) Exercise-induced bone gain is due to an enlargement in bone size without changes in volumetric bone density: a peripheral quantitative computed tomography study of the upper arms of male tennis players. Bone 27:351–357
Hind K, Burrows M (2007) Weight-bearing exercise and bone mineral accrual in children and adolescents: a systematic review of controlled trials. Bone 40:14–27
Hind K, Truscott JG, Evans JE (2006) Low lumbar spine bone mineral density in both male and female endurance runners. Bone 39:880–885
Hind K, Oldroyd B, Truscott J (2011) In vivo short term precision of the GE Lunar iDXA for the measurement of total body, lumbar spine and femoral bone mineral density in adults. J Clin Densitom 13(4):413–417
Janz KF, Gilmore JM, Levy SM, Letuchy EM, Burns TL, Beck TJ (2007) Physical activity and femoral neck bone strength during childhood: the Iowa bone development study. Bone 41(2):216–222
Kaptoge S, Beck T, Reeve J, Stone K, Hillier T, Cauley J, Cummings SR (2008) Prediction of incident hip fracture by femur geometry variables measured by hip structural analysis in the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Min Res 23(12):1892–1904
Karlsson MK, Alborg HG, Obrant K, Nyquist F, Lindenberg H, Karlsson C (2002) Exercise during growth and young adulthood is associated with reduced fracture risk in old ages. J Bone Miner Res 17 (suppl 1):s297
LaCroix AZ, Beck TJ, Cauley JA, Lewis CE, Bassford T, Jackson R, Wu T, Chen Z (2010) Hip structural geometry and incidence of hip fracture in postmenopausal women: what does it add to conventional bone mineral density? Osteoporos Int 21(6):919–929
LaMothe JM, Hamilton NH, Zerricke RF (2003) Strain rate influences periosteal adaptation in mature bone. Med Eng Phys 27(4):277–284
Lanyon LE, Rubin CT (1984) Static vs. dynamic loads as an influence on bone remodelling. J Biomech 17:897–905
Leslie WD, Pahlavan PS, Tsang JF, Lix LM (2009) Prediction of hip and other osteoporotic fractures from hip geometry in a large clinical cohort. Osteoporos Int 20(10):1767–1774
Magknos F, Kavouros S, Yanakorka M et al (2007) The bone response to weight-bearing exercise is sport-, site-, and sex-specific. Clin J Sports Med 17:123–128
Martin BR, Burr DB (1984) Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry. J Biomech 17(3):195–201
Matsumoto T, Nakagawa S, Nishida S et al (1997) Bone density and bone metabolic markers in active collegiate athletes: findings in long distance runners, judoists and swimmers. Int J Sports Med 18:408–412
Melton LJ 3rd, Atkinson EJ, O’Conner MK et al (1998) Bone density and fracture risk in men. J Bone Miner Res 13:1915
Nikander R, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Daley RM, Uusi-Rasi K, Kannus P (2010) Targeted exercise against osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for optimising bone strength throughout life. BMC Med 8(47):1–10
Pederson EA, Akhler MP, Cullen DM, Kimmel DB, Recker RR (1995) Bone response to in vivo mechanical loading in C3H/HeJ mice. Calcif Tiss Int 65(1):41–46
Petit M, Beck TJ, Lin HM, Bentley C, Legro T, Lloyd T (2004) Femoral bone structural geometry adapts to mechanical loading and is influenced by sex steroids: the Penn State Young Women’s Health Study. Bone 35:750–759
Prevrhal S, Shepherd JA, Faulkner KG, Gaither KW, Black DM, Lang TF (2008) Comparison of DXA hip structural analysis with volumetric QCT. J Clin Densitom 11(2):232–236
Schoenue E (2005) From the mechanostat theory to the development of the ‘functional muscle–bone unit’. J Musculoskel Neuronal Interact 5(2):232–238
Seeman E (2008) Structural basis of growth related gain and age-related loss of bone strength. Rheumatology 47(4):2–8
Smock AJ, Hughes J, Cobb K et al (2009) Bone volumetric density, geometry and strength in male and female collegiate runners. Med Sci Sport Exerc 41:2026–2032
Sugiyami T, Price JS, Lanyon LE (2010) Functional adaptation to mechanical loading in both cortical and cancellous bone is controlled locally and confined to the loaded bones. Bone 46(2):314–321
Travison TG, Araujo AB, Esche GR, Beck TJ, McKinlay JB (2008) Lean mass and not fat mass is associated with male proximal femur strength. J Bone Min Res 23(2):189–198
Turner CH (2003) Periosteal apposition and fracture risk. J Musculoskelet Neuron Interact 3(4):410
Wang XF, Duan Y, Beck TJ, Seeman E (2005) Varying contributions of growth and ageing to racial and sex differences in femoral neck structure and strength in old age. Bone 36:978–986
Yates LB, Karasik D, Beck TJ, Cupples LA, Kiel DP (2007) Hip structural geometry in old and old–old age: similarities and differences between men and women. Bone 41(4):722–732
Yoshikawa T, Turner CH, Peacock M, Slemender CW, Weaver CM, Teegarden D, Markwardt P, Burr DB (1994) Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using dual X-ray absorptiometry. J Bone Miner Res 9:1053–1064
Conflict of interest
There were no sources of external funding for this research study. All the authors do not perceive or have any potential conflicts of interests.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Susan A. Ward.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hind, K., Gannon, L., Whatley, E. et al. Bone cross-sectional geometry in male runners, gymnasts, swimmers and non-athletic controls: a hip-structural analysis study. Eur J Appl Physiol 112, 535–541 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2008-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-011-2008-y