Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A hexapedal jointed-leg model for insect locomotion in the horizontal plane

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We develop a simple model for insect locomotion in the horizontal (ground) plane. As in earlier work by Seipel et al. (Biol Cybern 91(0):76–90, 2004) we employ six actuated legs that also contain passive springs, but the legs, with “hip” and ‘knee’ joints, better represent insect morphology. Actuation is provided via preferred angle inputs at each joint, corresponding to zero torques in the hip and knee springs. The inputs are determined from estimates of foot forces in the cockroach Blaberus discoidalis via an inverse problem. The head–thorax–body is modeled as a single rigid body, and leg masses, inertia and joint dissipation are ignored. The resulting three degree-of-freedom dynamical system, subject to feedforward joint inputs, exhibits stable periodic gaits that compare well with observations over the insect’s typical speed range. The model’s response to impulsive perturbations also matches that of freely-running cockroaches (Jindrich and Full, J Exp Biol 205:2803–2823, 2002), and stability is maintained in the face of random foot touchdowns representative of real insects. We believe that this model will allow incorporation of realistic muscle models driven by a central pattern generator in place of the joint actuators, and that it will ultimately permit the study of proprioceptive feedback pathways involving leg force and joint angle sensing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahn A and Full R (2002). A motor and a brake: two leg extensor muscles acting at the same joint manage energy differently in a running insect. J Exp Biol 205: 379–389

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Altendorfer R, Moore N, Komsuoglu H, Buehler M, Brown HB Jr, McMordie D, Saranli U, Full R and Koditschek D (2001). RHex: a biologically inspired hexapod runner. Auton Robots 11: 207–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brown I and Loeb G (2000). A reductionist approach to creating and using neuromusculoskeletal movement. In: Winters, M and Crago, E (eds) Biomechanics and neural control of movement, pp 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown I, Scott S and Loeb G (1995). Preflexes—programmable high-gain zero-delay intrinsic responses of perturbed musculoskeletal systems. Soc Neurosci Abstr 21: 562.9

    Google Scholar 

  5. Delcomyn F (2004). Insect walking and robotics. Annu Rev Entomol 149: 51–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dudek D (2006) Passive mechanical properties of the exoskeleton simplify the control of rapid running in the cockroach Blaberus discoidalis. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley

  7. Dudek D and Full R (2006). Passive mechanical properties of legs from running insects. J Exp Biol 209: 1502–1515

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Full R and Ahn A (1995). Static forces and moments generated in the insect leg: comparison of a three-dimensional musculo-skeletal computer model with experimental measurements. J Exp Biol 198: 1285–1298

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Full R and Koditschek D (1999). Templates and anchors: neuromechanical hypothesis of legged locomotion on land. J Exp Biol 202: 3325–3332

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Full R and Tu M (1990). Mechanics of six-legged runners. J Exp Biol 148: 129–146

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Full R and Tu M (1991). Mechanics of a rapid running insect: two-, four- and six-legged locomotion. J Exp Biol 156: 215–231

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Full R, Blickhan R and Ting L (1991). Leg design in hexapedal runners. J Exp Biol 158: 369–390

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Full R, Stokes D, Ahn A and Josephson R (1998). Energy absorption during running by leg muscles in a cockroach. J Exp Biol 201: 997–1012

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Full R, Kubow T, Schmitt J and Koditschek D (2002). Quantifying dynamic stability and maneuverability in legged locomotion. Int Comp Biol 42: 149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Guckenheimer J and Holmes P (1990). Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems and bifurcations of vector fields. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holmes P, Full R, Koditschek D and Guckenheimer J (2006). The dynamics of legged locomotion: models, analyses and challenges. SIAM Rev 48(2): 207–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jindrich D and Full R (2002). Dynamic stabilization of rapid hexapedal locomotion. J Exp Biol 205: 2803–2823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Komsuoglu H, Koditschek D (2000) Preliminary analysis of a biologically inspired 1-dof ‘clock’ stabilized hopper. In: Proc. world multiconf. on systemics, cybernetics and informatics (SCI2000), vol IX, pp 670–675, 23–26 July 2000

  19. Kram R, Wong B and Full R (1997). Three-dimensional kinematics and limb kinetic energy of running cockroaches. J Exp Biol 200: 1919–1929

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kubow T and Full R (1999). The role of the mechanical system in control: a hypothesis of self stabilization in hexapedal runners. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B 354: 849–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pearson K (1972). Central programming and reflex control of walking in the cockroach. J Exp Biol 56: 173–193

    Google Scholar 

  22. Poulakakis I, Smith J and Buehler M (2005). Modeling and experiments of untethered quadrupedal running with a bounding gait: the Scout II robot. Int J Robot Res 24(4): 239–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Poulakakis I, Papadopoulos E and Buehler M (2006). On the stability of the passive dynamics of quadrupedal running with a bounding gait. Int J Robot Res 25(7): 669–687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritzmann R, Gorb S, Quinn R (eds) (2004) Arthropod locomotion systems: From biological materials and systems to robotics. Arthropod Struct Dev 33(3)(special issue)

  25. Saranli U, Buehler M and Koditschek D (2001). RHex: A simple and highly mobile hexapod robot. Int J Robot Res 20(7): 616–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Schmitt J and Holmes P (2000a). Mechanical models for insect locomotion: dynamics and stability in the horizontal plane—I. Theory. Biol Cybern 83(6): 501–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Schmitt J and Holmes P (2000b). Mechanical models for insect locomotion: dynamics and stability in the horizontal plane—II Application. Biol Cybern 83(6): 517–527

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Schmitt J and Holmes P (2001). Mechanical models for insect locomotion: stability and parameter studies. Physica D 156(1–2): 139–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Schmitt J and Holmes P (2003). Mechanical models for insect locomotion: active muscles and energy losses. Biol Cybern 89(1): 43–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schmitt J, Garcia M, Razo C, Holmes P and Full R (2002). Dynamics and stability of legged locomotion in the horizontal plane: a test case using insects. Biol Cybern 86(5): 343–353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Seipel J and Holmes P (2006). Three dimensional translational dynamics and stability of multi-legged runners. Int J Robot Res 25(9): 889–902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Seipel J, Holmes P and Full R (2004). Dynamics and stability of insect locomotion: a hexapedal model for horizontal plane motions. Biol Cybern 91(0): 76–90

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ting L, Blickhan R and Full R (1994). Dynamic and static stability in hexapedal runners. J Exp Biol 197: 251–269

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA

    Raghavendra P. Kukillaya

  2. Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Program in Applied and Computational Mathematics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, 08544, USA

    Philip J. Holmes

Authors
  1. Raghavendra P. Kukillaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philip J. Holmes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raghavendra P. Kukillaya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kukillaya, R.P., Holmes, P.J. A hexapedal jointed-leg model for insect locomotion in the horizontal plane. Biol Cybern 97, 379–395 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0180-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00422-007-0180-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation