Skip to main content
Log in

Developmental responses to predation risk in morphologically defended mayflies

  • Population Ecology
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Densities and species composition of predators could affect morphological defences, larval development and the timing of emergence of their prey. To address this issue we studied the morphology and life history of an ephemerellid mayfly, Ephemerella invaria, from two streams in a deciduous forested drainage basin in central New York. Both streams contained predatory fish, but densities and species composition of fish differed. A field survey provided evidence that Ephemerella inhabiting a stream with ≥10 fish species and high relative densities of fish emerged several weeks earlier and at smaller sizes than Ephemerella inhabiting a nearby tributary with ~2 fish species and low relative densities of fish. However, the two populations of mayflies showed no differences in defensive morphology or growth rates. In laboratory rearing experiments, we exposed Ephemerella larvae from these two locations to fish chemical cues or control water (no fish) over 2 months to test whether differences in life histories could be attributed to fish. Fish cues induced faster larval development, but also smaller size of mature Ephemerella individuals from both high and low predator locations. Although shorter development times in more dangerous environments could increase larval survival, smaller size of females results in a fecundity cost associated with this life history shift. Consistent with the field studies, laboratory rearing experiments revealed no effects of fish cues on Ephemerella's morphological defences. These data suggest that variation in the density or species composition of predators may favour the evolution of developmental plasticity to reduce mortality in the larval environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Appleton RD, Palmer AR (1988) Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4387–4391

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Johansson F (1998) Ontogenetic reaction norms of predator-induced defensive morphology in dragonfly larvae. Ecology 79:1847–1858

    Google Scholar 

  • Bechara JA, Moreau G, Planas D (1993) The impact of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) on an experimental stream community: the role of spatial and size refugia. J Anim Ecol 62:451–464

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlin T (1984) Quantitative electrofishing for salmon and trout – views and recommendations. Information från Sötvattenslaboratoriet, Drottningholm 4:1-33

  • Bradshaw WE, Johnsson K (1995) Initiation of metamorphosis in the pitcher-plant mosquito: effects of larval growth history. Ecology 76:2055–2065

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittain JE (1982) Biology of mayflies. Annu Rev Entomol 27:119–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Miner JG (1992) Predator-induced phenotyphical change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science 258:1348–1350

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowl TA, Covich AP (1990) Predator-induced life-history shifts in a freshwater snail. Science 247:949–951

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl J (1998a) The impact of vertebrate and invertebrate predators on a stream benthic community. Oecologia 117:217–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl J (1998b) The importance of predation in benthic stream communities. PhD dissertation, Lund University, Sweden

  • Dahl J, Peckarsky BL (2002) Induced morphological defenses in the wild: predator effects on a mayfly Drunella coloradensis. Ecology 83:1620–1634

    Google Scholar 

  • Delucchi CM (1988) A comparison of community structure, life histories and movement patterns of benthic macroinvertebrates between permanent and temporary streams. PhD dissertation, Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y., USA

  • Delucchi CM, Peckarsky BL (1989) Life history adaptations of insects in a temporary stream. J N Am Benthol Soc 8:308–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Diehl S, Cooper SD, Kratz KW, Nisbet RM, Roll SK, Wiseman SW, Jenkins TM (2000) Effects of multiple, predator-induced behaviors on short-term producer-grazer dynamics in open systems. Am Nat 156:294–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI (1984) Predation of Heterocope septentrionalis on two species of Daphnia: morphological defences and their cost. Ecology 65:1249–1257

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas PL, Forrester GE, Cooper SD (1994) Effects of trout on the diel periodicity of drifting in baetid mayflies. Oecologia 98:48–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Endler JA (1986) Defence against predators. In: Feder ME, Lauder GV (eds) Predator-prey relationships. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 109–134

  • Flecker AS, Allan JD, McClintock NL (1988) Male body size and mating success in swarms of the mayfly, Epeorus longimanus. Holarctic Ecol 11:280–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest TG (1987) Insect size tactics and development strategies. Oecologia 73:178–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrester GE (1994) Influence of predatory fish on the drift dispersal and local density of stream insects. Ecology 75:1208–1218

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodbrod JR, Goff ML (1990) Effects of larval population density on rates of development and interactions between two species of Chrysomya (Diptera: Calliphoridae) in laboratory cultures. J Med Entomol 27:338–343

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harvell CD (1984) Predator-induced defense in a marine bryozoan. Science 224:1357–1359

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvell CD (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Q Rev Biol 65:323–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler SL, McPeek MA (1989) Predation risk and the foraging behaviour of competing stream insects. Ecology 70:1811–1825

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardner B (2000) Morphological and life history responses to predators in larvae of seven anurans. Oikos 88:169–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1962) Theory of fitness in a heterogeneous environment. I. The fitness set and adaptive function. Am Nat 96:361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levins R (1968) Evolution in changing environments. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

  • Lima SL, Dill LM (1990) Behavioural decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus. Can J Zool 68:619–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively CM (1986) Predator-induced shell dimorphism in the acorn barnacle, Chthamalus anisopoma. Evolution 40:232–242

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh AR, Peckarsky BL (1999) Criteria determining behavioural responses to multiple predators by a stream mayfly. Oikos 85:554–564

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh AR, Townsend CR (1994) Interpopulation variation in mayfly antipredator tactics: differential effects of contrasting predatory fish. Ecology 75:2078–2090

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek M, Peckarsky BL (1998) Life histories and the strength of species interactions: combining mortality, growth, and fecundity effects. Ecology 79:867–879

    Google Scholar 

  • Nijhout HF (1999) Control mechanisms of polyphenic development in insects. Bioscience 49:181–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1985) Do predaceous stoneflies and siltation affect the structure of stream insect communities colonising enclosures? Can J Zool 63:1519–1530

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL (1987) Mayfly cerci as defense against stonefly predation: deflection and detection. Oikos 48:161–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, McIntosh AR (1998) Fitness and community consequences of avoiding multiple predators. Oecologia 113:565–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Penton MA (1988) Why do Ephemerella nymphs scorpion posture: a "ghost of predation past"? Oikos 53:185–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Cowan CA, Penton MA, Anderson CR (1993) Sublethal consequences of stream-dwelling predatory stoneflies on mayfly growth and fecundity. Ecology 74:1836–1846

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, Taylor B, McIntosh AR, McPeek MA, Lytle DA (2001) Variation in mayfly size at metamorphosis as a developmental response to risk of predation. Ecology 82:740–757

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, McIntosh AR, Taylor BW, Dahl J (2002a) Predator chemicals induce changes in mayfly life history traits: a whole-stream manipulation. Ecology 83:612–618

    Google Scholar 

  • Peckarsky BL, McIntosh AR, Caudill CC, Dahl J (2002b) Stabilizing selection on male body size of high altitude populations of Baetis bicaudatus (Ephemeroptera: Baetidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 51:530–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW, Kats LB, Sih A (1987) Predator-prey interactions among fish and larval amphibians: use of chemical cues to detect predatory fish. Anim Behav 35:420–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettersson LB (1999) Phenotypic plasticity and the evolution of an inducible morphological defence in crucian carp. PhD dissertation, Department of Ecology, Lund University, Sweden

  • Reimer O, Tedengren M (1996) Phenotypical improvment of morphological defences in the mussel Mytilus edulis induced by exposure to the predator Asterias rubens. Oikos 75:383–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott DE (1994) The effects of larval density on adult demographic traits in Ambystoma opacum. Ecology 75:1383–1396

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD, Scott DE, Pechmann JHK (1988) Time and size at metamorphosis related to adult fitness in Ambystoma talpoideum. Ecology 69:184–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Crowley PH, McPeek MA, Petranka JW, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 16:269–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmonds JSJ, Blaney WM (1986) Effects of rearing density on development and feeding behaviour of larvae of Spodoptera exempta. J Insect Physiol 32:1043–1053

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK, Werner EE (1990) Behavioural and life-historical responses of larval American toads to an odonate predator. Ecology 71:2313–2322

    Google Scholar 

  • So PM, Dudgeon D (1989) Variations in the life-history parameters of Hemipyrellia ligurriens (Diptera: Calliphora) in response to larval competition for food. Ecol Entomol 14:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Soluk D (1990) Postmolt susceptibility of Ephemerella larva to predatory stoneflies: constraints on defensive armour. Oikos 58:336–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney BW, Vannote RL (1981) Ephemerella mayflies of White Clay Creek: bioenergetics and ecological relationships among six coexisting species. Ecology 62:1353–1369

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollrian R, Harvell CD (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princton University Press, Princeton, N.J.

  • Wilbur HM, Fauth JE (1990) Experimental aquatic food webs: interactions between two predators and two prey. Am Nat 135:176–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Glenn Howser and Phil Kaufman at the Schwardt Laboratory for help during the induction experiment. We thank also Christer Brönmark, Andrea Encalada, Lawrence Dill and Kajsa Åbjörnsson for providing critical comments on the manuscript. Financial support was received from the Swedish Natural Science Research Council (STINT) to J. Dahl and NSF Grant (DEB96-29404) to B. Peckarsky.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas Dahl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dahl, J., Peckarsky, B.L. Developmental responses to predation risk in morphologically defended mayflies. Oecologia 137, 188–194 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1326-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-003-1326-0

Keywords

Navigation