Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dispersal and life history strategies in epiphyte metacommunities: alternative solutions to survival in patchy, dynamic landscapes

  • Community Ecology - Original Paper
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Host trees for obligate epiphytes are dynamic patches that emerge, grow and fall, and metacommunity diversity critically depends on efficient dispersal. Even though species that disperse by large asexual diaspores are strongly dispersal limited, asexual dispersal is common. The stronger dispersal limitation of asexually reproducing species compared to species reproducing sexually via small spores may be compensated by higher growth rates, lower sensitivity to habitat conditions, higher competitive ability or younger reproductive age. We compared growth and reproduction of different groups of epiphytic bryophytes with contrasting dispersal (asexual vs. sexual) and life history strategies (colonists, short- and long-lived shuttle species, perennial stayers) in an old-growth forest stand in the boreo-nemoral region in eastern Sweden. No differences were seen in relative growth rates between asexual and sexual species. Long-lived shuttles had lower growth rates than colonists and perennial stayers. Most groups grew best at intermediate bark pH. Interactions with other epiphytes had a small, often positive effect on growth. Neither differences in sensitivity of growth to habitat conditions nor differences in competitive abilities among species groups were found. Habitat conditions, however, influenced the production of sporophytes, but not of asexual diaspores. Presence of sporophytes negatively affected growth, whereas presence of asexual diaspores did not. Sexual species had to reach a certain colony size before starting to reproduce, whereas no such threshold existed for asexual reproduction. The results indicate that the epiphyte metacommunity is structured by two main trade-offs: dispersal distance vs. reproductive age, and dispersal distance vs. sensitivity to habitat quality. There seems to be a trade-off between growth and sexual reproduction, but not asexual. Trade-offs in species traits may be shaped by conflicting selection pressures imposed by habitat turnover and connectivity rather than by species interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H (1974) A new look at statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Contr AC 19:716–722

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amarasekare P (2003) Competitive coexistence in spatially structured environments: a synthesis. Ecol Lett 6:1109–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anonymous (1997) Fältinstruktion för ståndortskarteringen. Institutionen för Skoglig Marklära, SLU, Uppsala

  • Bates D, Maechler M, Dai B (2008) lme4 version 0.999375-28. http://www.lme4.r-forge.r-project.org/

  • Bengtsson J, Fagerström T, Rydin H (1994) Competition and coexistence in plant communities. Trees 9:246–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisang I, Ehrlén J (2002) Reproductive effort and cost of sexual reproduction in female Dicranum polysetum. Bryologist 105:384–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bossuyt B, Honnay O (2006) Interactions between plant life span, seed dispersal capacity and fecundity determine metapopulation viability in a dynamic landscape. Landscape Ecol 21:1195–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference, 2nd edn. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte MW, Mai DV, Jantz S, Collins MD, Keele M, Drake JA (2006) On testing the competition-colonization trade-off in a multispecies assemblage. Am Nat 168:704–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Amarasekare P, Cottenie K, Gonzales A, Holt RD, Holyoak M, Hoopes MF, Leibold MA, Loreau M, Mouquet N, Shurin JB, Tilman D (2005) Competing theories for competitive metacommunities. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Chesson P (2000) Mechanisms of maintenance of species diversity. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:343–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dettki H, Esseen P-A (2003) Modelling long-term effects of forest management on epiphytic lichens in northern Sweden. For Ecol Manage 175:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierßen K (2001) Distribution, ecological amplitude and phytosociological characterization of European bryophytes. Cramer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • During HJ (1979) Life strategies of bryophytes: a preliminary review. Lindbergia 5:2–18

    Google Scholar 

  • During HJ (1992) Ecological classification of bryophytes and lichens. In: Bates JW, Farmer AM (eds) Bryophytes and lichens in a changing environment. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • During HJ (2007) Relations between clonal growth, reproduction and breeding system in the bryophytes of Belgium and The Netherlands. Nova Hedw Beih 131:133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlén J, Bisang I, Hedenäs L (2000) Costs of sporophyte production in the moss, Dicranum polysetum. Plant Ecol 149:207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson P (1997) Ekologisk landskapsplanering i Vällenområdet, Rapport 5. Upplandsstiftelsen, Uppsala

  • Frahm J-P, Frey W (2004) Moosflora, 2nd edn. Ulmer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazer GW, Canham CD, Lertzman KP (1999) Gap Light Analyzer (GLA), Version 2.0: Imaging software to extract canopy structure and gap light transmission indices from true-colour fisheye photographs, users manual and program documentation. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Insitute of Ecosystem Studies, Millbrook

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill MO, Preston CD, Bosanquet SDS, Roy DB (2007) Bryoatt—attributes of British and Irish mosses, liverworts and hornworts. CEH, NERC, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Mouquet NM, Holt RD, Hoopes MF (2005) Metacommunities: a framework for large-scale community ecology. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities. The University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingerpuu N, Vellak K, Möls T (2007) Growth of Neckera pennata, an epiphytic moss of old-growth forests. Bryologist 110:309–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johst K, Brandl R, Eber S (2002) Metapopulation persistence in dynamic landscapes: the role of dispersal distance. Oikos 98:263–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson S (2007) Image. http://www.sk-biometri.se

  • Kimmerer RW (1994) Ecological consequences of sexual versus asexual reproduction in Dicranum flagellare and Tetraphis pellucida. Bryologist 97:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneitel JM, Chase JM (2004) Trade-offs in community ecology: linking spatial scales and species coexistence. Ecol Lett 7:69–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laaka-Lindberg S, Korpelainen H, Pohjama M (2003) Dispersal of asexual propagules in bryophytes. J Hattori Bot Lab 93:319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Laaka-Lindberg S, Korpelainen H, Pohjama M (2006) Spatial distribution of epixylic hepatics in relation to substrate in a boreal old-growth forest. J Hattori Bot Lab 100:311–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibold MA, Miller TE (2004) From metapopulations to metacommunities. In: Hanski I, Gaggiotti OE (eds) Ecology, genetics, and evolution of metapopulations. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 133–150

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H (2006a) Species richness patterns and metapopulation processes—evidence from epiphyte communities in boreo-nemoral forests. Ecography 26:169–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H (2006b) Metapopulation processes in epiphytes inferred from patterns of regional distribution and local abundance in fragmented forest landscapes. J Ecol 94:856–868

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Löbel S, Snäll T, Rydin H (2009) Mating system, reproduction mode and diaspore size affect metacommunity diversity. J Ecol 97:176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loehle C (2000) Strategy space and the disturbance spectrum: a life-history model for tree species coexistence. Am Nat 156:14–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TE, Kneitel JM (2005) Inquiline communities in pitcher plants as a prototypical metacommunity. In: Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD (eds) Metacommunities. The University of Chicago press, Chicago, pp 122–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder CPH, Uliassi DD, Doak DF (2001) Physical stress and diversity-productivity relationships: the role of positive interactions. PNAS 98:6704–6708

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pinheiro J, Bates D, DebRoy S, Sarkar D (2008) nlme version 3.1-90. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna

  • Pohjamo M, Laaka-Lindberg S (2004) Demographic structure of a leafy epixylic hepatic Anastrophyllum hellerianum (Nees ex Lindenb.) R.M. Schust. Plant Ecol 173:3–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Pohjamo M, Laaka-Lindberg S, Ovaskainen O, Korpelainen H (2006) Dispersal potential of spores and asexual diaspores in the epixylic hepatic Anastrophyllum hellerianum. Evol Ecol 20:415–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2008) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing

  • Rixen C, Mulder CPH (2005) Improved water retention links high species richness with increased productivity in artic tundra moss communities. Oecologia 146:287–299

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rydgren K, Økland RH (2002) Ultimate costs of sporophyte production in the clonal moss Hylocomium splendens. Ecology 83:1573–1579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rydin H (2009) Population and community ecology of bryophytes. In: Shaw AJ, Goffinet B (eds) Bryophyte biology, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 393–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebel HN, During HJ (2006) Beknopte mosflora van Nederland en België. K.N.N.V., Utrecht

  • Snäll T, Ribeiro PJ Jr, Rydin H (2003) Spatial occurrence and colonizations in patch-tracking metapopulations: local conditions versus dispersal. Oikos 103:566–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snäll T, Fogelqvist J, Ribeiro PJ Jr, Lascoux M (2004a) Spatial genetic structure in two congeneric epiphytes with different dispersal strategies analysed by three different methods. Mol Ecol 13:2109–2119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snäll T, Hagström A, Rudolphi J, Rydin H (2004b) Distribution pattern of the epiphyte Neckera pennata on three spatial scales—importance of past landscape structure, connectivity, and local conditions. Ecography 27:757–766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snäll T, Ehrlén J, Rydin H (2005) Colonization and extinction dynamics of an epiphyte metapopulation in a dynamic landscape. Ecology 86:106–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venables WN, Ripley BD (1999) Modern applied statistics with S-PLUS. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund K, Rydin H (2004a) Colony expansion of Neckera pennata: modelled growth rate and effect of microhabitat, competition, and precipitation. Bryologist 107:293–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund K, Rydin H (2004b) Ecophysiological constraints on spore establishment in bryophytes. Funct Ecol 18:907–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zartman CE, Shaw AJ (2006) Metapopulation extinction thresholds in rain forest remnants. Am Nat 167:177–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Irene Bisang, Heinjo During, Tord Snäll, Sebastian Sundberg and Lars Söderström for useful comments on the manuscript, and Scott Spellerberg for revising the English. Financial support was received from FORMAS. The work conforms to the legal requirements of the countries in which it was carried out, including those relating to conservation and welfare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Plant Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, 752 36, Uppsala, Sweden

    Swantje Löbel & Håkan Rydin

Authors
  1. Swantje Löbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Håkan Rydin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swantje Löbel.

Additional information

Communicated by Brian Beckage.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Löbel, S., Rydin, H. Dispersal and life history strategies in epiphyte metacommunities: alternative solutions to survival in patchy, dynamic landscapes. Oecologia 161, 569–579 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1402-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-009-1402-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation