Abstract
Stoichiometric homeostasis, the degree to which an organism maintains its C:N:P ratios around a given species- or stage-specific value despite variation in the relative availabilities of elements in its resource supplies, is a key parameter in ecological stoichiometry. However, its regulation and role in affecting organismal and ecosystem processes is still poorly understood in vascular plants. We performed a sand culture experiment and a field nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) addition experiment to evaluate the strength of N, P and N:P homeostasis in higher plants in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Our results showed that homeostatic regulation coefficients (H) of vascular plants ranged from 1.93 to 14.5. H varied according to plant species, aboveground and belowground compartments, plant developmental stage, and overall plant nutrient content and N:P ratio. H for belowground and for foliage were inversely related, while H increased with plant developmental stage. H for N (H N) was consistently greater than H for P (H P) while H for N:P (H N:P) was consistently greater than H N and H P. Furthermore, species with greater N and P contents and lower N:P were less homeostatic, suggesting that more homeostatic plants are more conservative nutrient users. The results demonstrate that H of plants encompasses a considerable range but is stronger than that of algae and fungi and weaker than that of animals. This is the first comprehensive evaluation of factors influencing stoichiometric homeostasis in vascular plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersen T, Hessen DO (1991) Carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus content of freshwater zooplankton. Limnol Oceanogr 36:807–814
Bai Y, Han X, Wu J, Chen Z, Li L (2004) Ecosystem stability and compensatory effects in the inner Mongolia grassland. Nature 431:181–184
Bremner JM (1996) Nitrogen: total. In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1085–1123
Chapin FS (1980) Nutrient allocation and responses to defoliation in tundra plants. Arct Alp Res 12:553–563
Chrzanowski TH, Kyle M (1996) Ratios of carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in Pseudomonas fluorescens as a model for bacterial element ratios and nutrient regeneration. Aquat Microb Ecol 10:115–122
Demars BOL, Edwards AC (2007) Tissue nutrient concentrations in freshwater aquatic macrophytes: high inter-taxon differences and low phenotypic response to nutrient supply. Freshw Biol 52:2073–2086
DeMott WR, Pape BJ (2005) Stoichiometry in an ecological context: testing for links between Daphnia P-content, growth rate and habitat preference. Oecologia 142:20–27
Elrifi IR, Turpin DH (1985) Steady-state luxury consumption and the concept of optimum nutrient ratios: a study with phosphate and nitrate limited Selenastrum minutum (Chlorophyta). J Phycol 21:592–602
Elser JJ, Hamilton A (2007) Stoichiometry and the new biology—the future is now. Plos Biol 5:1403–1405
Elser JJ et al (2000a) Nutritional constraints in terrestrial and freshwater food webs. Nature 408:578–580
Elser JJ et al (2000b) Biological stoichiometry from genes to ecosystems. Ecol Lett 3:540–550
Elser JJ, Fagan WF, Kerkhoff AJ, Swenson NG, Enquist BJ (2010) Biological stoichiometry of plant production: metabolism, scaling and ecological response to global change. New Phytol 186:593–608
Frost PC, Evans-White MA, Finkel ZV, Jensen TC, Matzek V (2005) Are you what you eat? Physiological constraints on organismal stoichiometry in an elementally imbalanced world. Oikos 109:18–28
Goldman JC, Caron DA, Dennett MR (1987) Regulation of gross growth efficiency and ammonium regeneration in bacteria by substrate C:N ratio. Limnol Oceanogr 32:1239–1252
Güsewell S (2004) N:P ratios in terrestrial plants: variation and functional significance. New Phytol 164:243–266
Güsewell S (2005) Responses of wetland graminoids to the relative supply of nitrogen and phosphorus. Plant Ecol 176:35–55
Güsewell S, Bollens U (2003) Composition of plant species mixtures grown at various N:P ratios and levels of nutrient supply. Basic Appl Ecol 4:453–466
Hessen DO, Ågren GI, Anderson TR, Elser JJ, de Ruiter PC (2004) Carbon sequestration in ecosystems: the role of stoichiometry. Ecology 85:1179–1192
Hoagland R, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for growing plants without soil. Circular 347, California Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Agriculture. University of California, Berkeley
Jensen MH, Collins WL (1985) Hydroponic vegetable production. Hortic Rev 7:483–558
Jeyasingh PD, Weider LJ, Sterner RW (2009) Genetically-based trade-offs in response to stoichiometric food quality influence competition in a keystone aquatic herbivore. Ecol Lett 12:1229–1237
Karimi R, Folt CL (2006) Beyond macronutrients: element variability and multielement stoichiometry in freshwater invertebrates. Ecol Lett 9:1273–1283
Kooijman S (1995) The stoichiometry of animal energetics. J Theor Biol 177:139–149
Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: Sparks DL et al (eds) Methods of soil analysis. Part 3. Chemical methods. Soil Science Society of America and American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 869–920
Levi MP, Cowling EB (1969) Role of nitrogen in wood deterioration VII. Physiological adaptation of wood-destroying and other fungi to substrates deficient in nitrogen. Phytopathology 59:460–468
Limpens J, Berendse F (2003) Growth reduction of Sphagnum magellanicum subjected to high nitrogen deposition: the role of amino acid nitrogen concentration. Oecologia 135:339–345
Makino W, Cotner JB, Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2003) Are bacteria more like plants or animals? Growth rate and resource dependence of bacterial C:N:P stoichiometry. Funct Ecol 17:121–130
Nakano S (1994) Carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus ratios and nutrient regeneration of a heterotrophic flagellate fed on bacteria with different elemental ratios. Arch Hydrobiol 129:257–271
Persson J, Fink P, Goto A, Hood JM, Jonas J, Kato S (2010) To be or not to be what you eat: regulation of stoichiometric homeostasis among autotrophs and heterotrophs. Oikos doi:10.1111/j.1600-0706.2010.18545.x
Reiners WA (1986) Complementary models for ecosystems. Am Nat 127:59–73
Rhee GY (1978) Effects of N:P atomic ratios and nitrate limitation on algal growth, cell composition and nitrate uptake. Limnol Oceanogr 23:10–25
Ryser P, Lambers H (1995) Root and leaf attributes accounting for the performance of fast- and slow-growing grasses at different nutrient supply. Plant Soil 170:251–265
Schoenau JJ, Huang WZ (1991) Anion-exchange membrane, water, and sodium bicarbonate extractions as soil tests for phosphorus. Commun Soil Sci Plan 22:465–492
Shafik HM, Herodek S, Presing M, Voros L, Balogh KV (1997) Growth of Cyclotella meneghiniana Kutz. II. Growth and cell composition under different growth rates with different limiting nutrient. Ann Limnol Int J Limnol 33:223–233
Shaver GR, Melillo JM (1984) Nutrient budgets of marsh plants: efficiency concepts and relation to availability. Ecology 65:1491–1510
Sterner RW, Elser JJ (2002) Ecological stoichiometry: the biology of elements from molecules to the biosphere. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Tezuka Y (1990) Bacterial regeneration of ammonium and phosphate as affected by the carbon:nitrogen:phosphorus ratio of organic substrates. Microb Ecol 19:227–238
Vanni MJ (2002) Nutrient cycling by animals in freshwater ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 33:341–370
Vogel S (1998) Academically correct biological science. Am Sci 86:504–506
Wang C, Wan S, Xing X, Zhang L, Han X (2006) Temperature and soil moisture interactively affected soil net N mineralization in temperate grassland in Northern China. Soil Biol Biochem 38:1101–1110
Yu Q et al (2010) Linking stoichiometric homeostasis with ecosystem structure, functioning, and stability. Ecol Lett 13:1390–1399
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Inner Mongolia Grassland Ecosystem Research Station (IMGERS) for providing the experimental sites and elemental analysis. This work was supported by the Key Project of National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC, 30830026), the Innovative Research Group Project of NSFC (30821062), and the State Key Basic Research Development Program (2007CB106801). J. Elser acknowledges support from the National Science Foundation (DEB-0618193). We would like to thank R.W. Sterner, H. Heilmeier and two anonymous reviewers for their comments that greatly improved earlier versions of this manuscript. The main participants for the field experiment included Lishi Zhou, Fumei Lv, Hao Yang, Yanshu Liu, Deliang Kong, Xiaotao Lv, Qiang Li, Jianjun Chen, and Fuli Zhang; they are gratefully acknowledged.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Hermann Heilmeier.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yu, Q., Elser, J.J., He, N. et al. Stoichiometric homeostasis of vascular plants in the Inner Mongolia grassland. Oecologia 166, 1–10 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1902-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-010-1902-z