Skip to main content
Log in

Prickles, latex, and tolerance in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy (Argemone glauca): variation between populations, across ontogeny, and in response to abiotic factors

  • Plant-microbe-animal interactions - Original research
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Covariance among plant defense traits is predicted to occur both within and among plant species, potentially leading to characteristic defense syndromes. I examined patterns of variation in prickle density, latex exudation, and tolerance in order to assess whether traits varied between populations, across plant ontogeny, and as phenotypic plasticity in response to water and light limitation and physical damage using the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy, Argemone glauca, as a model system. Plants produced copious latex, had extremely variable prickle densities, and were generally tolerant of 50 % defoliation. However, expression patterns differed among defense traits. Prickle density was consistent across ontogeny and was not induced by either water limitation or mechanical damage, but was significantly induced under high light conditions. In contrast, latex exudation increased significantly across ontogeny and was reduced by water limitation, but had no response to mechanical damage or light. Prickles, latex, and tolerance differed considerably between populations, suggesting different evolutionary histories for these populations. These disparate patterns indicate that latex and prickles are unlinked within A. glauca, potentially as a result of differences in their function, and providing little evidence that they jointly function as a defense syndrome. Moreover, this study provides the first description patterns of variation for multiple defense traits in an island endemic, and high levels of prickles, latex, and tolerance suggest that A. glauca is well defended against herbivores. Future research in the field will provide additional insights into the functional ecology of these traits in A. glauca.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA (2007) Macroevolution of plant defense strategies. Trends Ecol Evol 22:103–109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Fishbein M (2006) Plant defense syndromes. Ecology 87:S132–S149

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Konno K (2009) Latex: a model for understanding mechanisms, ecology, and evolution of plant defense against herbivory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:311–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA et al (2009) Phylogenetic ecology of leaf surface traits in the milkweeds (Asclepias spp.): chemistry, ecophysiology, and insect behavior. New Phytol 183:848–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin RE (1979) Hawaii’s poisonous plants. Petroglyph, Hilo

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton KE, Koricheva J (2010) The ontogeny of plant defense and herbivory: characterizing general patterns using meta-analysis. Am Nat 175:481–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bell AD, Bryan A (2008) Plant form: an illustrated guide to flowering plant morphology, new edn. Timber, London

  • Benz BW, Martin CE (2006) Foliar trichomes, boundary layers, and gas exchange in 12 species of epiphytic Tillandsia (Brometiaceae). J Plant Physiol 163:648–656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlquist SJ (1970) Hawai’i: a natural history, 2nd edn. Pacific Tropical Botanical Garden, Lawai, Kaua’i, Hawai’i

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SM, Ginnett TF (1998) Spines protect plants against browsing by small climbing mammals. Oecologia 113:219–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper SM, Owensmith N (1986) Effects of plant spinescence on large mammalian herbivores. Oecologia 68:446–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva DM, Batalha MA (2011) Defense syndromes against herbivory in a cerrado plant community. Plant Ecol 212:181–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) (1983) Variable plants and herbivores in natural and managed systems. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornoni J (2011) Ecological and evolutionary implications of plant tolerance to herbivory. Funct Ecol 25:399–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Givnish TJ, Sytsma KJ, Smith JF, Hahn WJ (1994) Thorn-like prickles and heterophylly in Cyanea—adaptations to extinct avian browsers on Hawai’i. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:2810–2814

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goeden RD, Ricker DW (1985) Prickly poppies, Argemone corymbosa and Argemone munita, in Southern California—native weeds attacked by few insects. Ann Entomol Soc Am 78:214–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez JM, Zamora R (2002) Thorns as induced mechanical defense in a long-lived shrub (Hormathophylla spinosa, Cruciferae). Ecology 83:885–890

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowda JH (1996) Spines of Acacia tortilis: what do they defend and how? Oikos 77:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowda JH (1997) Physical and chemical response of juvenile Acacia tortilis trees to browsing. Experimental evidence. Funct Ecol 11:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagel JM, Yeung EC, Facchini PJ (2008) Got milk? The secret life of laticifers. Trends Plant Sci 13:631–639

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern SL, Adler LS, Wink M (2010) Leaf herbivory and drought stress affect floral attractive and defensive traits in Nicotiana quadrivalvis. Oecologia 163:961–971

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamback PA, Beckerman AP (2003) Herbivory and plant resource competition: a review of two interacting interactions. Oikos 101:26–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanley ME, Lamont BB, Fairbanks MM, Rafferty CM (2007) Plant structural traits and their role in anti-herbivore defence. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 8:157–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herms DA, Mattson WJ (1992) The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. Q Rev Biol 67:283–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James HF, Burney DA (1997) The diet and ecology of Hawaii’s extinct flightless waterfowl: evidence from coprolites. Biol J Linn Soc 62:279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan GJ, Dillon RA, Weston PH (2005) Solar radiation as a factor in the evolution of scleromorphic leaf anatomy in Proteaceae. Am J Bot 92:789–796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson LM, Tamado T, Milberg P (2003) Seed dormancy pattern of the annuals Argemone ochroleuca and A. mexicana (Papaveraceae). Flora 198:329–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koricheva J, Nykanen H, Gianoli E (2004) Meta-analysis of trade-offs among plant antiherbivore defenses: are plants jacks-of-all-trades, masters of all? Am Nat 163:E64–E75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leimu R, Koricheva J (2006) A meta-analysis of tradeoffs between plant tolerance and resistance to herbivores: combining the evidence from ecological and agricultural studies. Oikos 112:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liakopoulos G, Nikolopoulos D, Klouvatou A, Vekkos KA, Manetas Y, Karabourniotis G (2006) The photoprotective role of epidermal anthocyanins and surface pubescence in young leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Ann Bot 98:257–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lilleeng-Rosenberger KE (2005) Growing Hawaii’s native plants. Mutual, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Meléndez PA, Capriles VA (2002) Molluscicidal activity of plants from Puerto Rico. Ann Trop Med Parasitol 96:209–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moles AT et al (2013) Correlations between physical and chemical defences in plants: tradeoffs, syndromes, or just many different ways to skin a herbivorous cat? New Phytol 198:252–263

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osho A, Adetunji T (2010) Antimicrobial activity of the essential oil of Argemone mexicana Linn. J Med Plants Res 4:19–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickard WF (2008) Laticifers and secretory ducts: two other tube systems in plants. New Phytol 177:877–887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pisani JM, Distel RA (1998) Inter- and intraspecific variations in production of spines and phenols in Prosopis caldenia and Prosopis flexuosa. J Chem Ecol 24:23–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rasband WS (1997–2011) ImageJ. In: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/

  • Sakthivadivel M, Thilagavathy D (2003) Larvicidal and chemosterilant activity of the acetone fraction of petroleum ether extract from Argemone mexicana L. seed. Bioresour Technol 89:213–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreuder MDJ, Brewer CA, Heine C (2001) Modelled influences of non-exchanging trichomes on leaf boundary layers and gas exchange. J Theor Biol 210:23–32

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzbach AE, Kadereit JW (1999) Phylogeny of prickly poppies, Argemone (Papaveraceae), and the evolution of morphological and alkaloid characters based on ITS nrDNA sequence variation. Plant Syst Evol 218:257–279

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shaukat SS, Siddiqui IA, Khan GH, Zaki MJ (2002) Nematicidal and allelopathic potential of Argemone mexicana, a tropical weed—Allelopathic and nematicidal potential of Argemone mexicana. Plant Soil 245:239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simms EL (2000) Defining tolerance as a norm of reaction. Evol Ecol 14:563–570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh TD, Singh VP, Pandey VB (2010) A new benzylisoquinoline alkaloid from Argemone mexicana. Nat Prod Res 24:63–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Skelton RP, Midgley JJ, Nyaga JM, Johnson SD, Cramer MD (2012) Is leaf pubescence of Cape Proteaceae a xeromorphic or radiation-protective trait? Aust J Bot 60:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stamp N (2003) Out of the quagmire of plant defense hypotheses. Q Rev Biol 78:23–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss SY, Rudgers JA, Lau JA, Irwin RE (2002) Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivory. Trends Ecol Evol 17:278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiffin P (2000) Mechanisms of tolerance to herbivore damage: what do we know? Evol Ecol 14:523–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travers-Martin N, Muller C (2008) Matching plant defence syndromes with performance and preference of a specialist herbivore. Funct Ecol 22:1033–1043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verma SK, Dev G, Tyagi AK, Goomber S, Jain GV (2001) Argemone mexicana poisoning: autopsy findings of two cases. Forensic Sci Int 115:135–141

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler AC (2002) Hawaiian natural history, ecology, and evolution. University of Hawai’i Press, Honolulu

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Veronica Gibson, Lauren Kerr and Desmond Maurer for greenhouse assistance, and Maureen Moffit for laboratory assistance. Comments by two anonymous reviewers and the handling editor considerably improved the manuscript. The Maui Nui Botanical Garden generously allowed seeds to be collected from plants on the premises. Financial support was provided by the College of Natural Sciences, University of Hawai’i at Mānoa. The experiments comply with the current laws of the USA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kasey E. Barton.

Additional information

Communicated by John Lill.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Barton, K.E. Prickles, latex, and tolerance in the endemic Hawaiian prickly poppy (Argemone glauca): variation between populations, across ontogeny, and in response to abiotic factors. Oecologia 174, 1273–1281 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2836-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-013-2836-z

Keywords

Navigation