Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of ICD-9 Code 787.2 for Identification of Individuals with Dysphagia from Administrative Databases

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of dysphagia coding using the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9) code 787.2. We used the administrative database of a tertiary hospital and sequential videofluorographic swallowing study (VFSS) reports for patients admitted to the same hospital from January to June 2007. The VFSS reports were abstracted and the hospital’s database was queried to abstract the coding associated with the admission during which the VFSS was performed. The VFSS and administrative data were merged for data analysis. Dysphagia was coded (using code 787.2) in 36 of 168 cases that had a VFSS. Of these, 34 had dysphagia diagnosed by VFSS (our gold standard) and one had a prior history of dysphagia. Code 787.2 had sensitivity of 22.8, specificity of 89.5, and positive and negative predictive values of 94.4 and 12.9, respectively. Dysphagia was largely undercoded in this database, but when the code was present those individuals were very likely to be dysphagic. Selection of dysphagic cases using the ICD-9 code is appropriate for within-group comparisons. Absence of the code, however, is not a good predictor of the absence of dysphagia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hsu LY, Koh TH. Use of ICD-9 diagnosis codes in epidemiologic surveys may significantly underestimate the incidence and impact of invasive pneumococcal disease locally. Singapore Med J. 2008;49:441.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Skull SA, Andrews RM, Byrnes GB, Campbell DA, Nolan TM, Brown GV, et al. ICD-10 codes are a valid tool for identification of pneumonia in hospitalized patients aged > or = 65 years. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136:232–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Varas-Lorenzo C, Castellsague J, Stang MR, Tomas L, Aguado J, Perez-Gutthann S. Positive predictive value of ICD-9 codes 410 and 411 in the identification of cases of acute coronary syndromes in the saskatchewan hospital automated database. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008;17:842–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Labovitz DL. Accuracy and yield of ICD-9 codes for identifying children with ischemic stroke. Neurology. 2007;68:1638; Author reply 1638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leone MA, Gaviani P, Ciccone G. Inter-coder agreement for ICD-9-CM coding of stroke. Neurol Sci. 2006;27:445–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Brook RA, Wahlqvist P, Kleinman NL, Wallander MA, Campbell SM, Smeeding JE. Cost of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease to the employer: a perspective from the United States. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;26:889–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Finlayson SR, Birkmeyer JD, Laycock WS. Trends in surgery for gastroesophageal reflux disease: the effect of laparoscopic surgery on utilization. Surgery. 2003;133:147–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD. National trends in utilization and outcomes of antireflux surgery. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:864–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Joish VN, Donaldson G, Stockdale W, Oderda GM, Crawley J, Sasane R, et al. The economic impact of GERD and PUD: examination of direct and indirect costs using a large integrated employer claims database. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005;21:535–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Stoltey J, Reeba H, Ullah N, Sabhaie P, Gerson L. Does Barrett’s oesophagus develop over time in patients with chronic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease? Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007;25:83–91.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yakoob J, Jafri W, Abid S, Jafri N, Islam M, Hamid S, et al. Candida esophagitis: risk factors in non-HIV population in pakistan. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2328–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuhlemeier K, Palmer JB, González-Fernández M. Epidemiology of upper digestive tract cancer in hospitalized patients. Dysphagia. 2006;21:334.

    Google Scholar 

  13. González-Fernández M, Kuhlemeier K, Palmer JB. Racial disparities in the development of dysphagia after stroke: analysis of the California (MIRCal) and New York (SPARCS) inpatient databases. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1358–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jones B. The tailored examination. In: Jones B, editor. Normal and abnormal swallowing: imaging in diagnosis and therapy. 2nd ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2003. p. 35–53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marlís González-Fernández.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

González-Fernández, M., Gardyn, M., Wyckoff, S. et al. Validation of ICD-9 Code 787.2 for Identification of Individuals with Dysphagia from Administrative Databases. Dysphagia 24, 398–402 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9216-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-009-9216-1

Keywords

Navigation