Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro porcine training model for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: an inexpensive and safe way to acquire a complex endoscopic technique

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has developed in recent years to permit en bloc resection of larger colorectal lesions that cannot be done by standard polypectomy or mucosal resection techniques. Colonic ESD is technically demanding and has a steep learning curve. Adequate training is essential to make ESD a reliable treatment for colorectal neoplasms. We aim to share our early experience with an in vitro porcine training model for colonic ESD.

Method

Resected porcine distal colon was used to set up a training model for ESD, which was performed as in human using a standard endoscope and dissecting devices. Size of the lesions, operation time, en bloc resection rate, and perforation rate were recorded.

Results

Ten consecutive colonic ESD procedures were performed by a single endoscopist. Incomplete resection and perforation were encountered during the first two procedures. No perforation occurred in subsequent procedures and the operation time per task also decreased gradually. The setup cost for this model was only around US $30.

Conclusions

The in vitro porcine model is easy and inexpensive to set up. Our initial experience showed that the model could simulate colonic ESD in human and technical proficiency improved by repetition. This simple setup may be a promising training model for endoscopists working in areas with a low incidence of early gastric cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hurlstone DP, Fujii T, Lobo AJ (2002) Early detection of colorectal cancer using high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy. Br J Surg 89:272–282

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hurlstone DP, Cross SS, Adam I, Shorthouse AJ, Brown S, Sanders DS, Lobo AJ (2004) Efficacy of high magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the diagnosis of neoplasia in flat and depressed lesions of the colorectum: a prospective analysis. Gut 53:284–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rex DK (2007) Have we defined best colonoscopic polypectomy practice in the United States? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:674–677

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kudo S (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed types of early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25:455–461

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saitoh Y, Fujiya M, Watari J (2008) Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic piecemeal mucosal resection for colorectal neoplasia. In: Niwa H (ed) New challenges in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Springer, Tokyo, pp 346–352

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Arebi N, Swain D, Suzuki N, Fraser C, Price A, Saunders BP (2007) Endoscopic mucosal resection of 161 large sessile or flat colorectal polyps. Scand J Gastroenterol 42:859–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Maheshwari A, Ouyang D, Rouse RV, Wren S, Soetikno R (2007) Short- and long-term outcomes of standardized EMR of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal lesions > or = 1 cm. Gastrointest Endosc 65:857–865

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gotoda T, Yamamoto H, Soetikno RM (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection of early gastric cancer. J Gastroenterol 41:929–942

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ono H, Kondo H, Gotoda T, Shirao K, Yamaguchi H, Saito D, Hosokawa K, Shimoda T, Yoshida S (2001) Endoscopic mucosal resection for treatment of early gastric cancer. Gut 48:225–229

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N, Kodashima S, Muraki Y, Ono S, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2007) Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:678–683

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T, Emura F, Ikehara H, Mashimo Y, Kikuchi T, Fu KI, Sano Y, Saito D (2007) Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections. Gastrointest Endosc 66:966–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T, Fukunaga S, Sakamoto T, Uraoka T, Nakajima T, Ikehara H, Fu KI, Itoi T, Fujii T (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24(2):343–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N, Hinohara C, Oshima T, Kogure E, Liu Y, Uemura N, Saito K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors. Endoscopy 39:418–422

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bourke M (2009) Current status of colonic endoscopic mucosal resection in the West and the interface with endoscopic submucosal dissection. Dig Endosc 21:S22–S27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I, Hirata M, Mouri R, Kanao H, Yoshida S, Chayama K (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Taku K, Sano Y, Fu KI, Saito Y, Matsuda T, Uraoka T, Yoshino T, Yamaguchi Y, Fujita M, Hattori S, Ishikawa T, Saito D, Fujii T, Kaneko E, Yoshida S (2007) Iatrogenic perforation associated with therapeutic colonoscopy: a multicenter study in Japan. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:1409–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshida N, Wakabayashi N, Kanemasa K, Sumida Y, Hasegawa D, Inoue K, Morimoto Y, Kashiwa A, Konishi H, Yagi N, Naito Y, Yanagisawa A, Yoshikawa T (2009) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: technical difficulties and rate of perforation. Endoscopy 41:758–761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Yahagi N, Neuhaus H, Schumacher B, Neugebauer A, Kaehler GF, Schenk M, Fischer K, Fujishiro M, Enderle MD (2009) Comparison of standard endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: an animal study. Endoscopy 41:340–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamoto H (2007) Technology insight: endoscopic submucosal dissection of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 4:511–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank Dr. Y. Saito of the National Cancer Center of Japan for allowing us to adopt and modify their animal model for ESD training.

Disclosures

Drs. Hon, Ng, Lee, Li, and Lo have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie S. F. Hon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hon, S.S.F., Ng, S.S.M., Lee, J.F.Y. et al. In vitro porcine training model for colonic endoscopic submucosal dissection: an inexpensive and safe way to acquire a complex endoscopic technique. Surg Endosc 24, 2439–2443 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0982-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-010-0982-5

Keywords

Navigation